From: owner-buffy-digest@lists.xmission.com (buffy-digest) To: buffy-digest@lists.xmission.com Subject: buffy-digest V2 #535 Reply-To: buffy@lists.xmission.com Sender: owner-buffy-digest@lists.xmission.com Errors-To: owner-buffy-digest@lists.xmission.com Precedence: bulk buffy-digest Wednesday, October 21 1998 Volume 02 : Number 535 In this issue: Re: BUFFY: Moral Messages in Buffy BUFFY: ???????? Re: BUFFY: Don't Call 'Buffy' a Feminist Re: BUFFY: He never Gets Tired of Doing That (B&tB) Re: BUFFY: National ratings for B&tB Re: BUFFY: Overnight ratings for BATB BUFFY: B & t B and Invitations Re: BUFFY: Beauty & the Beast: Boring, boring, boring. BUFFY: Niki Calendar BUFFY: Funny Poster in the Ladies Room BUFFY: best ep so far, oui? BUFFY: Re: buffy and hope. Re: BUFFY: Niki Calendar BUFFY: Beauty and Beasts comments BUFFY: undead questions Re: BUFFY: Overnight ratings for BATB BUFFY: My Thoughts On AMAB (Or is it B&TB?)-SPOILERS BUFFY: beauty and the beasts Re: BUFFY: beauty and the beasts BUFFY: Angel BUFFY: Faith and 5x5 BUFFY: Buffy previews BUFFY: Buffy background Re:Subject: BUFFY: The Drive Up Window BUFFY: Watcher Retreat .02 Re: BUFFY: B&tB Fwd: BUFFY: FUNNY Re: BUFFY: Lunch Box Re: BUFFY: Angel BUFFY: I hate Scott See the end of the digest for information on subscribing to the buffy or buffy-digest mailing lists and on how to retrieve back issues. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Wed, 21 Oct 1998 18:18:19 EDT From: CrzyBluSk8@aol.com Subject: Re: BUFFY: Moral Messages in Buffy In a message dated 98-10-19 19:38:04 EDT, cybrpaws@wco.com writes: << Are we missing any obvious ones here? >> How about 'Don't stay with an abusive boyfriend, he might kill you'? Summer - - ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 21 Oct 1998 18:24:06 EDT From: LIZARDQ23@aol.com Subject: BUFFY: ???????? ok my friend wanted to know why angel was quivering in the end. i know why and i tried to explain it but i couldn't. what should i tell her? - - ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 21 Oct 1998 18:39:30 EDT From: CrzyBluSk8@aol.com Subject: Re: BUFFY: Don't Call 'Buffy' a Feminist In a message dated 98-10-20 19:01:07 EDT, cybrpaws@wco.com writes: << Well, Sarah and Kate, if it weren't for feminists way-back-when, there would be no Buffy the Vampire Slayer and no Captain Janeway today, imnsho. And you two could be making your living in pantyhose commercials. >> Right on! I completely agree! and I shave my legs!! Summer - - ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 21 Oct 1998 18:45:49 EDT From: CrzyBluSk8@aol.com Subject: Re: BUFFY: He never Gets Tired of Doing That (B&tB) When angel was growling at Buffy, I was like "Oh, I see, tarzan no talk, just kill." And I was cheerin when Angel saved Buffy.' Summer - - ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 21 Oct 1998 18:46:05 -0400 From: Jeff Rohaly Subject: Re: BUFFY: National ratings for B&tB At 12:21 1998-10-21 -0700, Lisa Rose wrote: >So Buffy's cynicism offers more to jaded cityfolk, and F's >sincerity plays better to the naivete of the heartland? >(yes, rampant generalization much!). Hey, no worse a generalization than "all men are beasts" or "all feminists are hairy-legged". I swear that I remember the term "hairy-legged feminists" being used in a Buffy episode at some point but I can't place it. >Yee haw! Advertisers covet the big city markets, don't they? >And yet New York is now the bastion of Buffy support in the >big cities? Wasn't it once LA? I can see LA easier. Wonder >why the change? I believe it still does very well in LA. The season premiere got an 8.0/12 for example. I know it hit big in LA first though. I think Reptile Boy last fall was the first episode to win its timeslot in LA. >Well, there has been a slow but steady migration of Buffy dialogue >from the various Buffy mailing lists to the Buffy newsgroup. Newsgroups scare me. Although I just think I've been adversely impacted by checking out the Howard Stern newsgroup this week to see if anyone had anything to say about Charisma Carpenter's appearance on the show. Not many did, and there was certainly nothing worth repeating here. Anyway, there's some serious flaming in that group (yeah, yeah, I know -- there's rudeness and flaming in a Howard Stern newsgroup???). The Buffy newsgroup seems to be the opposite, from what I can tell. There's not too much flaming, but instead tons of posts from tons of people that just seem to know tons about the show. Even if I could keep up with the volume, I don't think I'd have much to add. Jeff Rohaly rohaly@iaw.com - - ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 21 Oct 1998 18:26:19 -0400 From: Jeff Rohaly Subject: Re: BUFFY: Overnight ratings for BATB At 09:20 1998-10-21 -0700, Autumn Nazarian wrote: >Not a lot of questions come to mind- with the possible exception of how >Angel is back (old question) and how he has so quickly started to >remember Buffy. Yeah, think about it. If time worked the same way in Angel's demon dimension as it did in the one from Anne, it was something like 100 years for each few days up here (I think). So essentially Angel's been tortured for thousands of years. Yet he still remembers Buffy. Ahhh. I can't remember what I was doing last *week* and I wasn't tortured by demons in the meantime. At least not literally. Of course, remember from Anne, Ken claimed that Ricky remembered Lily's name for years after he forgot his own. Then again, I would hope so, he did have a big honkin' tattoo of her name on his arm. Jeff Rohaly rohaly@iaw.com - - ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 21 Oct 1998 18:51:58 EDT From: Krystey567@aol.com Subject: BUFFY: B & t B and Invitations I have a question about Faith, Hope and Trick. How could Kacky Trousers get into Faith's hotel room without an invitation? I suppose some people could argue that it's a public place like a hospital or something but she's paying rent and living there so it's like an apartment. Just where is this fine line where you need an invitation or not? Also, in Beauty and the Beasts, I really liked this episode but something was bothering me through it. I think it was the fact that, we went through almost half an episode before they even revealed that there WAS a monster of the week. It was mostly just hinted that it was either Angel or Oz. Maybe, just a scene with what's his face playing with potions or a hint at it earlier in the episode because when they did introduce the potion, it was confusing for about a minute when it first appeared on screen. I didn't think it was obvious they had been in that room before. Maybe I missed a line or something. Krystey members.aol.com/krystey567 Be nice to dragons for you'd taste good with ketchup. - - ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 21 Oct 1998 18:00:32 CST From: "Cydney, " Subject: Re: BUFFY: Beauty & the Beast: Boring, boring, boring. > Right now, I'd be happy is they killed off Giles, Willow, Angel, and Buffy (of > course they could always bring them back to life later in the season). You guys > might not like Faith, but at least she knows what her duties are and takes the job > seriously. All righty then... Issues much? Get a grip, man. Cydney ** Proud Guardian of Ethan and Giles' Not So Subtle Sexual Tension ** - - ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 21 Oct 1998 18:58:56 EDT From: CrzyBluSk8@aol.com Subject: BUFFY: Niki Calendar ok, I have a Q. I've been reading a lot of fanfic (lately anyway), and I read a lot of fanfic where Jenny's name is Niki. What's up with that? Can someone explain Summer - - ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 21 Oct 1998 18:14:06 CST From: "Cydney, " Subject: BUFFY: Funny Poster in the Ladies Room Tiny Spoiler from AMAB - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Did anyone notice in the scene where buffy and Willow confront Abused Girl, that the poster behind her read something like "Girls Are Not Restricted (or maybe Attracted) to Dead Guys. LOL! Cydney ** Proud Guardian of Ethan and Giles' Not So Subtle Sexual Tension ** - - ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 21 Oct 1998 19:09:57 EDT From: CherryRed6@aol.com Subject: BUFFY: best ep so far, oui? <> *ok, i really liked last night's episode. it was great... *the tie-ins were amazing--the call of the wild monologues tying into angel, the psychiatrist's comments about monsters, and scott's comments about never truly knowing what's inside a person (like buffy!). also, buffy touched upon domestic violence in a rather informative (yet humorous and scary) way. the entire debbie complex of inferiority and twisted view of love...and the entire monster theme that went on... *as for the fights, those were all classic. oz and peter's showdown was hilarious. the werewolf running through the halls, giles' shooting in the back, and basically everything about the fight was neat. i liked how they kinda made you wonder if angel was really the one who mauled those people. i wondered, but in the back of my mind i knew they couldn't do that. i was especially satisfied with buffy and peter's fight....and how angel runs in and saves her (kinda like the good old days...) it was touching to see him stop growling and start talking and hugging buffy. i know i'm cheezy. :) *so in the end, i did think this episode was the best so far b/c it had everything it needed to satisfy my for the moment. although, i am wondering about angel's arrival and future. too bad next ep is a re-run but that's ok b/c i like the halloween ep too. sorry if i write in fragments, i am too tired at the moment to really care. :) - - ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 21 Oct 1998 17:33:01 -0600 From: "Doyce Testerman" Subject: BUFFY: Re: buffy and hope. <> Buffy killed her one true love by ramming a sword through his abdomen and banishing him to hell in order to protect everyone else. I think she can break up with a kid in school so that he doesn't get put at risk, and her image will remain intact. I personally /hope/ she shows the good conscience to dump him instead of string him along. (Actually, I personally hope she decides to stick with the living, but hey, that's me.) - - ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 21 Oct 1998 19:33:40 EDT From: RayneFire@aol.com Subject: Re: BUFFY: Niki Calendar In a message dated 10/21/98 7:04:25 PM Eastern Daylight Time, CrzyBluSk8@aol.com writes: > ok, I have a Q. I've been reading a lot of fanfic (lately anyway), and I read > a lot of fanfic where Jenny's name is Niki. What's up with that? Can someone > explain Well, when Ms. Calendar first showed up in I, Robot...You, Jane, her first name was never used....but in the script it appears as Niki. They later changed it. One reason I heard was because of mix-ups with Nicholas Brendan....some people call him Nicky.....and it could have gotten confusing. - -Rayne - - ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 21 Oct 1998 19:37:58 -0400 (EDT) From: cn2759@coastalnet.com (JW) Subject: BUFFY: Beauty and Beasts comments Below contain some spoilers for the Buffy episode which aired on Tuesday Oct 20, I must have missed the beginning of the episode where the WB changed its letters to NOW, and Joss and David were replaced with Gloria Steinam and Patricia Ireland. Wow, I thought they did some guy bashing back in 'Phases' that was gentle compared to this episode. If your a guy you feel about three feet tall after that episode. Speaking for all guys everywhere (least those who agree with me), I think we should kick Joss out of the Manly Beast club and change the secret beast handshake and not tell him. Okay so I guess this could be called the Oz episode. Joss wasn't kidding when he said they had redesigned the werewolf outfit. It still looked a bit goofy; in fact I didn't see much wolf more like "jo-jo the dog-faced boy". Also the physical size change, in 'phases' we had the big huge wolfman which was neat changing from the small Oz. It appeared that now the wolf stayed pretty much the same size has Oz. Also a big difference was that this time he ran around on all fours like a wolf, where before he was on two legs more. I will give them credit they didn't make the same mistake as in 'Phases' and give us any very long holding shots of the wolf, this time he was always moving. "Time's up, rules change" perhaps the best Oz line ever. A couple of questions, when did they start keeping Oz in the library cage? I kept waiting for them to say his folks were out of town, but didn't hear it. Additional I thought they chained him up on the full moon. Has a window always been in the cage, why didn't anyone ever use it before to escape that room? Also, werewolves have scheduled feeding times, whats up with that? Okay perhaps the only thing worse than being a guy with this episode is being a guy and a Xander fan. What is up with the character, did Nick tick off somebody on the staff or what? I could take having him fall asleep watching Oz, in fact I thought he would shoot himself with the dart gun. But to have him lay down and go to sleep the moment Willow leaves is a bit over the top. I know the Xander haters out there will love it, but I thought it was out of character. Yes Xander can open his mouth before he thinks, he can even screw something up without meaning to, but one thing he has never done is let his friends down. I know someone will bring the lie in Becoming, but I don't want to hear it. I tried to think about it and I'm sure some of the die-hard Xander haters will find something; but I couldn't think of a time Xander just let his friends down when they needed him let alone the team in what could have been a dangerous sitch. Again, if he had just fallen asleep over time that night, I wouldn't have much of a problem. But, having him not be there for Willow of all people is way out of character. Someone said they might be building something up down the line for Xander thats possible I suppose. It does seem with the last couple of episodes they are trying to isolate Xander from the rest of the group, particularly Buffy. I mean he really didn't even have a role in this episode, except at the start. It used to be when Buffy talked about who she could talk to, who her best friends were, it always included Xander. Recently its only been Willow and Giles. It doesn't appear to be one way either, I mean Buffy is dating and Xander not only doesn't have a problem with it; but doesn't even comment on it, no snide jealous tinted remarks. They should start looking for the pod that hatched this faux Xander I hope it changes soon, one of the things I have always loved best about 'Buffy' is the friendship between Buffy, Willow, and Xander. Buffy had some issues to deal with this episode. I found it interesting that Buffy was telling Debbie should couldn't protect Pete, while she was hiding Angel and protecting him by lying to the others. Wow she's moving sort of fast with Scott isn't she. Still don't you love televison, she just gets her life back together and is moving on and Angel comes back. You think that Buffy fell asleep watching Oz, or did she fall asleep at dawn? Also where is everyone, at lunch she seats with Scott and his friends, where are Xander, Willow, Cordy, Oz? I thought everyone in school with the exception of the crew thought Buffy was strange and crazy. Speaking of Angel, he is back in body if not in mind. So I guess he's been running around the woods for a while, since he came back before Buffy and Scott went out and they have been out a few times. Wonder what he has been living off of? Still he's mister psycho guy, for the show till the end, he breaks free goes to the school just in time to save Buffy, and that Kill apparently calms him enough to comprend what is going on. "Hello" why didn't he find Buffy before if he could find his way to school. I still want to find out if he will be giving back all his memory of what happened when he lost his soul. Looking forward to when he sees Buffy with Scott, and what will happen if he is still unstable-guy. I was surprised by the addition of Faith and Scott in this episode. I shouldn't be I suppose, but they are suppose to be part-time players like Oz last year or Angel in Year one. In fact you could have done this episode without Faith I thought. Felt like they just wanted to add her into the mix since she is new. I have decided I want Scott dead; I don't care how just get rid of him. I felt they should have tried to kill Angel last year, but not actually get rid of Angel. This is different I want Scott gone, he is beyond annoying. I am still concerned by the large number players, "Buffy" has brought into mix things up. This episode we saw the addition of Pete and Debbie for a short term solution. But really the show is becoming more like the cast of a soap-opera. I'm afraid its going to hurt the show's chemistry which has always been one of its strengths. I was interested in how cold they treated Pete's death. If he was under the influence of some potion he should have been a more pitied bad guy. I look back at SAR and IMG, both Frankie Jr., and Empata were shown in a much more sympathic light than Pete. At the end Angel kills him and seems like so what from the crew. Angel during his "bad-time" killed many people, but he was treated as a victim much of the time. They went out of there way to save Oz, from his werewolf disease, but they didn't really seem to care about Pete's problem either way. Now if they are trying to say he was the monster and the formula just gave him the strength, okay but they didn't paint it that way. I thought this had the tools to be a very good episode, and it was very strong in places. But I thought it was very weak in places also. Someone recently started a thread on Buffy's moral messages, usally they are more subtle this was more like an anvil falling on your head. Still, SMG was good as was Aly, considering it was the most he had to do I suppose it was best ep for Seth. Next week, why make a new halloween episode when you have an old to show. Still I laughed at the announcer and his "scary" nonsense about the show. Well I must go chase something down and kill or something, because I'm a manly beast guy. JW GASP Keeper "The Ripper" nickname Keeper Xander's Elvis bust "I can handle Oz's full monty" - - ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 21 Oct 1998 16:47:19 -0700 From: Autumn Nazarian Subject: BUFFY: undead questions hey there- if you have a question that deals with first or second season- or just a question that you suspect perhaps has been explored by the list some time before, please refer to the undead questions web page before you revive a thread that should have been put to rest long ago. http://www.amnix.com/~angel/undead.html. thanks A - - ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 21 Oct 1998 19:08:07 -0500 From: "Sarah W." Subject: Re: BUFFY: Overnight ratings for BATB > That's equal in rating and up a share from last week. I'm glad to see ratings aren't really dropping, even without much promotion. It shows how devoted the majority of Buffy fans are. > The superstitious part of me just hopes that > Devon Gummersall, aka Brian Krakow, doesn't bring the MSCL ratings > kiss-of-death to the show now that he's on it.) I know this is off-topic, but um, MSCL had average ratings of 7/11. (http://www.geocities.com/Hollywood/1412/mscl_air_dates.ratings.htm) > any theories as to why this episode has generated so few posts to this > list compared to the other new episodes this season? I'd noticed that, although I do have to scramble to read all the messages as it is. Well, the episode didn't really stand out as a whole to me, although it was solid (and there were priceless moments), and there was not much to debate upon, in my opinion. Discussion rates were as high as usual at the official PB. *shrug* I don't know much about the newsgroup, but Lisa Rose is probably right about that. Always, Sarah W. http://btvstribute.home.ml.org - - ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 21 Oct 1998 19:26:30 -0500 From: "Sarah W." Subject: BUFFY: My Thoughts On AMAB (Or is it B&TB?)-SPOILERS Thought I'd post my thoughts here, since there *isn't* that much discussion going on. | | S P O I L I E R | S P A C E | F O R | A M A B | | What bugs me is that Xander is almost just *used* by the writers now as a *plot device*. He's not getting any development; he just always does something *stupid* and gets Giles and everyone yelling at him. *hopeful look* Xander-episode any time soon? Willow. She couldn't believe that even a werewolf-Oz could kill someone? Anyhow, I was upset with her rejoicing. Although I know how relieved she must have been ("All right, I don't know." I can *imagine*, though...), someone still *died*, you know? (The donuts stuff was great, although if you've ever *seen* donuts be made, it's pretty sickening/depressing.) "Where have I been?" Where *have* they been? Is this show turning into Buffy & Willow, with minor roles of Oz & Giles? *Mr. Platt* got more time than Cordy and Xander. *Faith* got more time than Cordy. *sigh* I guess Buffy's boyfriend's the only one that can kill people, huh? I was thinking Oz might get Pete. He didn't get Theresa, either. Oh, well. That would bring up issues, I suppose, even though he'd have been a werewolf, and all. Now it sounds as if I hated it. I didn't. I just had to get that out so I could gush...Yay! to there being a well-developed monster storyline. *Really* great writing from Marti. (I agree that her name needs color.) Great jobs by Todd (scary!), Chris Beck, Jeff, Sophia, and the rest. I really liked Oz's scenes; great acting, Seth. Aly was wonderful as always; and I'm loving Giles' character this season. (BTW, did anyone else stop when Buffy said "the hills are alive"? *shiver*) But *Sarah*. She was *incredible*. I was crying during the scene with her and Angel at the end. If you just watch her facial expressions...*wow*. So according to Seth, the fifth is the homecoming episode. And Chris Beck says he really, really liked it...so I'm dying that I have to wait two weeks. 'Course, I get to tape my 'Halloween' in full, so that's of the good, but I waited four months! Do I sound whiny? Seriously, I really did like this episode. (I liked Scott, too, but um, they seemed closer than one week would grant?) Always, Sarah W. http://btvstribute.home.ml.org - - ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 21 Oct 1998 21:14:51 -0400 From: "B + C White" Subject: BUFFY: beauty and the beasts My take on the whole "Xander got trouble for sleeping, Buffy didn't" problem is that Xander fell asleep while Oz was a werewolf, while Buffy could have fallen asleep after daylight, when Oz was himself again. There is no conclusive proof one way or the other, but this is my educated guess. I am assuming that Joss would realize such an error. Celia bwhite1@tampabay.rr.com - - ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 21 Oct 1998 21:21:34 -0400 From: sah Subject: Re: BUFFY: beauty and the beasts At 09:14 PM 10/21/98 -0400, B + C White wrote: >My take on the whole "Xander got trouble for sleeping, Buffy didn't" problem >is that Xander fell asleep while Oz was a werewolf, while Buffy could have >fallen asleep after daylight, when Oz was himself again. There is no >conclusive proof one way or the other, but this is my educated guess. The big difference, too, as someone else already pointed out, is that Xander immediately and very *deliberately* goes to sleep while we don't know what Buffy did, so she gets the benefit of the doubt. Technically on the audience is privvy to Xander's circumstance. So maybe Giles did unfairly bust Xander, but IMO when he comes in on both those scenes Xander is stretched out on top of a table while it does look like Buffy has just dozed off in her chair. sah * romana@mindspring.com * romana@aol.com NatPack * Jungle Patrol * Bishop * BBPG:TGLIL * BTVS Colistowner AVENGERS poll: http://www.geocities.com/TelevisionCity/Set/1932/avengers/ "Unbelivable! 'Do you like my mask? Isn't it pretty? It raises the dead.....' Americans!" --Giles - - ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 21 Oct 1998 21:31:30 EDT From: LuvDCaprio@aol.com Subject: BUFFY: Angel Now that Angel is back, is he still a vampire? I'm guessing yes because time in the demon world supposedly moves much slower, and if he was there for the equivalent of hundreds of years, he must still be immortal since he didn't age. Just wondering... - - ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 21 Oct 1998 21:43:31 EDT From: tomwmac@juno.com (Thomas W MacCarrol) Subject: BUFFY: Faith and 5x5 Comes from radio proceedure where a signal's reception is rated for strength and clarity, both on a 1-to-5 scale. Thus 5 by 5 is lound and clear, i.e. everything is perfect. ___________________________________________________________________ You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail. Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866] - - ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 21 Oct 1998 21:43:30 EDT From: tomwmac@juno.com (Thomas W MacCarrol) Subject: BUFFY: Buffy previews Tom Mac Carrol tomwmac@juno.com ___________________________________________________________________ You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail. Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866] - - ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 21 Oct 1998 21:43:31 EDT From: tomwmac@juno.com (Thomas W MacCarrol) Subject: Re:Subject: BUFFY: The Drive Up Window Mr Trick is a big tipper? It may be true that vamps "..don't drink...WINE..", but can they not take in anything except blood (since it's non-nutriative for them, are other fluids the equivilent of ''junk' food?)? Extreme speculation; if the limo pushed through the daylight hours to get to Sunnydale (esp. through S.Cal desert), maybe the point was that the soda was COLD? Do vamps sweat? Or just feel icky at the thought of all that UV beating on the tinted glass??? Tom Mac Carrol tomwmac@juno.com ___________________________________________________________________ You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail. Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866] - - ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 21 Oct 1998 21:43:30 EDT From: tomwmac@juno.com (Thomas W MacCarrol) Subject: BUFFY: Watcher Retreat .02 Reading through the posts on this thread, the following popped up it's pointy head. Rupert Giles's rep among the other Watchers is (due to his 'Ripper' days) probably much like Buffy's among the Faculty and Admin of SHS. In fact, they may have assigned the two of them together for that very reason?!!?? ___________________________________________________________________ You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail. Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866] - - ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 21 Oct 1998 21:41:32 EDT From: Arakzile@aol.com Subject: Re: BUFFY: B&tB In a message dated 98-10-21 00:01:46 EDT, kmasters@rof.net writes: << When Buffy was spilling her guts to the counsler, was I the only one who thought that she might tell him about her being the slayer and that it would end up being Mr. Snyder in the chair? >> I totally thought that it was going to be Snyder....I hate the lousy troll!!!!!! I was really shocked when it turned out to actually be the counselor guy! Kara - - ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 21 Oct 1998 22:08:58 EDT From: MoonCat25@aol.com Subject: Fwd: BUFFY: FUNNY This is a multi-part message in MIME format. - --part0_909022139_boundary Content-ID: <0_909022139@inet_out.mail.aol.com.1> Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII - --part0_909022139_boundary Content-ID: <0_909022139@inet_out.mail.aol.com.2> Content-type: message/rfc822 Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Content-disposition: inline From: MoonCat25@aol.com Return-path: To: slayerqueen@juno.com Subject: Re: BUFFY: FUNNY Date: Wed, 21 Oct 1998 22:08:37 EDT Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit In a message dated 98-10-21 16:01:52 EDT, you write: << I found it amusing when you said WHEN she dumps him not If she dumps him WHEN she dumps him. >> She can't date someone human for too long.. Of course, there is the vibe that he might not be human and then of course if he's a fiend (beyond redemption) then he must die and well there's always Angel for her. (YEAH!) But that's just my opinion. MoonCat - --part0_909022139_boundary-- - - ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 21 Oct 1998 02:29:56 EDT From: TknoPagan@aol.com Subject: Re: BUFFY: Lunch Box yeah it was a scooby doo, i caught that and that what a sly dog...It was neat Aly had her own little doctors case... Jason TknoPagan@aol.com - - ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 21 Oct 1998 22:23:31 EDT From: Arakzile@aol.com Subject: Re: BUFFY: Angel In a message dated 98-10-21 21:34:15 EDT, LuvDCaprio@aol.com writes: << Now that Angel is back, is he still a vampire? >> In the end of Beauty and the Beasts...he was morphed into vamp for saving Buffy! So, I'm guessing yeah... Kara - - ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 21 Oct 1998 22:16:22 EDT From: Arakzile@aol.com Subject: BUFFY: I hate Scott I really really really don't like Scott....he's kinda annoying..and all through B+tB, I was like, "His friends need some serious helpage" and besides that, when Buffy came up to him at the end of the episode, I actually thought that she was going to break up with him! The I actually put 2 and 2 together and duh! His friends just died.....humph! I feel like he's puching Buffy, to be in a relationship....not only that, but she JUST aggreed to be friends with the guy, and she's smooching him? Ahhhhhhh! Just an Angel Lover! Kara - - ------------------------------ End of buffy-digest V2 #535 *************************** To subscribe to buffy or buffy-digest, send the command subscribe buffy-digest or subscribe buffy to majordomo@xmission.com. You will need to go through a confirmation process, and the listowners have to manually approve your subscription request, so it may take some time. Back issues of this digest can be found at: ftp://ftp.xmission.com/pub/lists/buffy/archive/ For help, contact Jill Kirby (jtkirby@mcs.com) or sah (romana@mindspring.com)