From: owner-canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com (canslim-digest) To: canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com Subject: canslim-digest V2 #1231 Reply-To: canslim Sender: owner-canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com Errors-To: owner-canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com Precedence: bulk Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-No-Archive: yes canslim-digest Monday, March 26 2001 Volume 02 : Number 1231 In this issue: RE: [CANSLIM] M Re: [CANSLIM] O'Neil Follow Through Day Re: [CANSLIM] Question - symbol is ??? [CANSLIM] foreign investment risks [CANSLIM] 52 week high vs historic high Re: [CANSLIM] Question RE: [CANSLIM] Weekend Review vs DG Index List RE: [CANSLIM] Weekend Review vs DG Index List Re: [CANSLIM] 52 week high vs historic high Re: [CANSLIM] Short HGS watch list Re: [CANSLIM] 52 week high vs historic high Re: [CANSLIM] 52 week high vs historic high [CANSLIM] Daily Graphs printed version [CANSLIM] 52 week high vs historic quandry Re: [CANSLIM] Daily Graphs printed version Re: [CANSLIM] Question - symbol is ??? [CANSLIM] Acc/Dis Numbers Re: [CANSLIM] Question - symbol is ??? Re: [CANSLIM] 52 week high vs historic quandry [CANSLIM] Re: SDH [CANSLIM] Today [CANSLIM] HGS Watch List [CANSLIM] More B/Os ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2001 14:05:01 -0500 From: "Rick Parsons" Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] M Dave, Being down 60% means you need to gain around 150% to get back to breakeven. I read somewhere that after a stock market bubble bursts, and the market finally turns around, it tends to revert to historical average gains. So if this happens and the market averages 15% a year, it will take you some 10 years or more to get back to your original account balance. If my logic is valid, then I cannot agree that riding out the bumps over the long haul is always a good strategy. It should be mandatory that every investor study the history of markets all the way back to the Gouda Tulip Bulb Mania in 1634 -1637. Every market bubble since that time has burst. Studying the history of markets helps one recognize when a bubble is happening and to prepare to exit to cash when necessary. Of course it is not easy to pick the exact point to exit. But it helps one see thru all the hype that "This time is different" and "this is the new economy" and "the market will go up until the baby boomers retire" etc. Rick - -----Original Message----- From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of Dave Cameron Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2001 8:15 PM To: canslim@lists.xmission.com Subject: [CANSLIM] M Once again, Tom Worley was right. His best guess was a 50 bp cut; and the reaction was predictable - a run for the exits. And to think, I was silly enough to get back in the market. I'm doing a great job of erasing my gains by jumping in too early. The scary part is that a mutual fund that I'm invested in (a small company fund) is now down 36% in 2001! For 1998 and 1999 it over-performed the Russell 2000 - so I guess it was due, but 36%? O'Neil says to ride out the bumps over the long haul for mutual funds - but this one is now down 55-60% since my June 30, 2000 statement. Of course, I'm not cashing in - I'm sticking to long term for mutual funds. Hope I'm not totally wrong. Anyway... today is an indicator to me that we are still in a bear market - and only ecstatic news will change that. Dave Cameron dfcameron@yahoo.com __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail. http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ - - - - ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2001 14:18:41 -0500 From: "Tom Worley" Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] O'Neil Follow Through Day Thursday pretty much restarted the clock on everything. Tom Worley stkguru@netside.net ICQ # 5568838 - ----- Original Message ----- From: Rick Parsons To: Sent: Sunday, March 25, 2001 1:42 PM Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] O'Neil Follow Through Day I was on a cruise last week (March 17 - 24) and in the back of my mind I kind of feared that I was going to miss a market rally after the Fed cut the rates on Tues. I was able to get CNN on the Celebrity Century ship and saw the market went down instead. What a relief to me...because I'm all in cash and I want to be ready to pounce. I haven't yet seen the charts...where are we on the count from Day zero? Rick - -----Original Message----- From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of Tom Worley Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2001 9:10 PM To: CANSLIM Subject: Fw: [CANSLIM] O'Neil Follow Through Day Rick, I saved this as it is one of the best and most succinct descriptions of what we all should be looking for right now. And I must agree with Tim, we are back to counting from ground zero, oops, I meant from Day 0. I am not shell shocked by today, just disappointed that we got a severe selloff after the news from the Feds. I had hoped we would only get a mild selloff, which would have been healthy. Looked that way at first, but just didn't last. But there's always tomorrow, at least futures are only down half a point at the moment, and Asia is surviving tho down (but Japan is rip roaring, up 1.9%). Tom Worley stkguru@netside.net ICQ # 5568838 - ----- Original Message ----- From: Rick Parsons To: Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2001 10:36 PM Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] O'Neil Follow Through Day Let's look for an O'Neil follow thru day. This occurs when a major index advances by more than 1% within 4 to 10 days of a closing low on increased volume from the prior trading session. The first three days of the rally are ignored unless all three days are up more than 1% on successively higher volume. The most powerful signals occur four to seven days off the closing low. Signals more than 10 days off the closing low are prone to failure. Comments? - - - - - - - - ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2001 14:21:00 -0500 From: "Tom Worley" Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Question - symbol is ??? David, pretty tough to respond without knowing what stock you are talking about. I base my decision making on data from DGO, not someone else's chart. Tom Worley stkguru@netside.net ICQ # 5568838 - ----- Original Message ----- From: David Squires To: Sent: Sunday, March 25, 2001 1:37 PM Subject: [CANSLIM] Question Hi all, Is there anyone on this list that would be looking to buy the pullback in this stock? Is there anyone who would have bought the last pullback to the 50 day MA? Would anyone have bought the retest of the cup and handle breakout form a messy handle? Good Trading, DSquires - - ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2001 13:06:10 -0800 (PST) From: Kent Norman Subject: [CANSLIM] foreign investment risks This weekend Bloomberg is running stories on foreign investment risks. They repeat about every 2 hours. This hour is on Asia. Regards Kent Norman __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail. http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ - - ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2001 19:37:10 -0500 From: "Robert McGill" Subject: [CANSLIM] 52 week high vs historic high When you buy a canslim stock is it crucial that the stock be at a new high or is a 52 week high ok? Dgo screens for 52 week highs right? Which is correct and where is the best place to get this info? - - ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2001 18:47:02 -0600 From: "Ricardo Bekin" Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Question David, that's pretty clever! it's our old friend the Nasdaq, but upside down! since it looks so obviously "extended" in a CANSLIM sense, the reverse is true, and the downtrend is far from broken good way to make the point Ricardo - ----- Original Message ----- From: "David Squires" To: Sent: Sunday, March 25, 2001 12:37 PM Subject: [CANSLIM] Question > Hi all, > > Is there anyone on this list that would be looking to buy the pullback in > this stock? > > Is there anyone who would have bought the last pullback to the 50 day MA? > > Would anyone have bought the retest of the cup and handle breakout form a > messy handle? > > Good Trading, > > DSquires > - - ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2001 18:50:27 -0600 From: "John Adair" Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] Weekend Review vs DG Index List Please tell me what you are calling the daily graph index. - -----Original Message----- From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of esetser Sent: Saturday, March 24, 2001 6:23 PM To: canslim@xmission.com Subject: [CANSLIM] Weekend Review vs DG Index List I did a quick look at the Weekend Review and looked to see how many of the stocks were/were not in the Daily Graphs Printed Product Index. I am specifically interested since I am using the DG Index data to generate watch lists. I thought others may be interested also. I found that there were a significant number of stocks in the Weekend Review NOT included in the Index. As far as A/B industry group stocks, I found something like 45 or so stocks out of about 130 stocks in the Weekend Review that didn't show up in the DG Index list. I reviewed each of these stocks and found that ALL of the missing stocks were very thinly traded issues. In general, most of these stocks traded less than 10,000 shares a day, and I believe all of the stocks traded less than 20,000 shares per day. These are all stocks that I would have screened out during my own screening due to average volume, so I wouldn't have considered any of the missing stocks. This is good news for me! Essentially, it means I can use the DG Index list this week as a source and capture all of the stocks in the Weekend Review that trade enough for my standards. This is only one week's worth of data, but it makes me think that I'm probably safe using the DG Index list without double-checking the Weekend Review for other candidates. - - - - ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2001 17:50:48 -0700 From: esetser Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] Weekend Review vs DG Index List This is one of the reports available from DGO. It is actually the index of the printed product Daily Graphs. At 06:50 PM 3/25/01 -0600, you wrote: >Please tell me what you are calling the daily graph index. > >-----Original Message----- >From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com >[mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of esetser >Sent: Saturday, March 24, 2001 6:23 PM >To: canslim@xmission.com >Subject: [CANSLIM] Weekend Review vs DG Index List > >I did a quick look at the Weekend Review and looked to see how many of the >stocks were/were not in the Daily Graphs Printed Product Index. I am >specifically interested since I am using the DG Index data to generate >watch lists. I thought others may be interested also. > >I found that there were a significant number of stocks in the Weekend >Review NOT included in the Index. As far as A/B industry group stocks, I >found something like 45 or so stocks out of about 130 stocks in the Weekend >Review that didn't show up in the DG Index list. I reviewed each of these >stocks and found that ALL of the missing stocks were very thinly traded >issues. In general, most of these stocks traded less than 10,000 shares a >day, and I believe all of the stocks traded less than 20,000 shares per day. > >These are all stocks that I would have screened out during my own screening >due to average volume, so I wouldn't have considered any of the missing >stocks. This is good news for me! Essentially, it means I can use the DG >Index list this week as a source and capture all of the stocks in the >Weekend Review that trade enough for my standards. This is only one week's >worth of data, but it makes me think that I'm probably safe using the DG >Index list without double-checking the Weekend Review for other candidates. > > >- > > >- > > > - - ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2001 20:45:50 -0500 From: "Tom Worley" Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] 52 week high vs historic high I rarely look beyond 52 weeks. There are just not that many investors of size anymore, including the institutionals, that hold long term. Best place for CANSLIM info? DGO, of course. Tom Worley stkguru@netside.net ICQ # 5568838 - ----- Original Message ----- From: Robert McGill To: Sent: Sunday, March 25, 2001 7:37 PM Subject: [CANSLIM] 52 week high vs historic high When you buy a canslim stock is it crucial that the stock be at a new high or is a 52 week high ok? Dgo screens for 52 week highs right? Which is correct and where is the best place to get this info? - - - - ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2001 19:23:14 -0800 From: Joe Maguire Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Short HGS watch list Sorry for delay re Grth stks anal. just been using on occasion to get my duck lined up.. can't give you any concrete answer ..I'mm open to any ideas on how to benefit with that service .. Best , Joe Maguire. San Diego Perry Stanfield wrote: > Tim, thanks for the link to HGS investing. Wow, what a new world. Looks > like a Canslim offshoot in prinicple. Just started jumping across all of > the links. How would you compare this service to others I've looked at > (DGO, Stocktables/Pitbull, GrowthStockAnalytics)? How did the picks work > over the past year for you? > > thanks for your input on the list > > Perry > > mpstan@home.com > > - - - ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2001 04:14:44 +0200 From: "Makara, Tamas" Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] 52 week high vs historic high During the wild bull markets of the last couple of years most high relative strength stocks were trading at all time highs so it was not necessary to look back too far. I think however that after this bear market there will be overhead supply in many stocks for years to come. In emerging markets for example overcoming highs made in 1997-1998 was a distintctive characteristic of the best stocks in 2000, and those highs often proved very important resistance levels. Within a year CSCO may be at a 52 week high at 25 (just a theoretical example). Those who only look at a 52 week chart will have no idea about this stock. Tamas > I rarely look beyond 52 weeks. There are just not that many > investors of size anymore, including the institutionals, that > hold long term. > > Best place for CANSLIM info? DGO, of course. > > Tom Worley > stkguru@netside.net > ICQ # 5568838 > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Robert McGill > To: > Sent: Sunday, March 25, 2001 7:37 PM > Subject: [CANSLIM] 52 week high vs historic high > > When you buy a canslim stock is it crucial that the stock be at a > new high > or is a 52 week high ok? Dgo screens for 52 week highs right? > Which is > correct and where is the best place to get this info? > > - > > - - - ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2001 01:30:49 -0500 From: "Robert McGill" Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] 52 week high vs historic high I believe this is an extremely crucial point and one which I believe O'Neil addresses on pp-163 of "How to Make Money", when he says, "coming out of a bear makrket, some patterns that have decreased 50% to 60% or more can succeed. The percent decline is, in these cases, a function of the severity of the bear market and the extent of the stock's prior price runup". I think that without saying it he is saying that historical highs are still what is important. I think that Tamas' point is valid. Usually at night at 550pm et on cnbc I listen to people call their stock questions in to the "Gurus?" and there is someone who is inevitably and doggedly is still holding on to the QCOM that they bought at $150 because they have had it pounded in to their thinking that long-term buy and hold is the way to buy stocks. I heard someone the other day still holding on to ariba that they got at 95 and they were asking if thye should sell it. Maybe the group could give this question some time? Bob - ----- Original Message ----- From: "Makara, Tamas" To: Sent: Sunday, March 25, 2001 9:14 PM Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] 52 week high vs historic high > During the wild bull markets of the last couple of years most high > relative strength stocks were trading at all time highs so it was not > necessary to look back too far. I think however that after this bear > market there will be overhead supply in many stocks for years to come. > In emerging markets for example overcoming highs made in 1997-1998 was a > distintctive characteristic of the best stocks in 2000, and those highs > often proved very important resistance levels. Within a year CSCO may be > at a 52 week high at 25 (just a theoretical example). Those who only > look at a 52 week chart will have no idea about this stock. > > Tamas > > > I rarely look beyond 52 weeks. There are just not that many > > investors of size anymore, including the institutionals, that > > hold long term. > > > > Best place for CANSLIM info? DGO, of course. > > > > Tom Worley > > stkguru@netside.net > > ICQ # 5568838 > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: Robert McGill > > To: > > Sent: Sunday, March 25, 2001 7:37 PM > > Subject: [CANSLIM] 52 week high vs historic high > > > > When you buy a canslim stock is it crucial that the stock be at a > > new high > > or is a 52 week high ok? Dgo screens for 52 week highs right? > > Which is > > correct and where is the best place to get this info? > > > > - > > > > - > > > - > - - ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2001 01:36:59 -0500 From: "Robert McGill" Subject: [CANSLIM] Daily Graphs printed version What is the period of time covered in the printed version of the graphs? I am debating the need for having the print copy of the charts. Of course the issue is cost vs utility. It seems that it would just be much easier if you could go through the printed charts to see the formations developing rather than looking at the 52 week highs then looking up the charts to see what is going on. It also seems to me that since O'Neil is looking for solid bases, that getting the charts every 2 weeks should be sufficient. - - ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2001 01:44:07 -0500 From: "Robert McGill" Subject: [CANSLIM] 52 week high vs historic quandry I think that more evidence pointing towards what Tamas said was given in the 3-26 IBD Investor's Corner when the question was posed to us, ""Will I embrace stocks beaten to a pulp? Will I buy low, scooping big name techs that were oversold? Or will I take the high road and buy stocks that race ahead to new highs?" The answer is then given, "Take the high road". The discussion follows. The only thing that bothers me here is that DGO does not seem to follow their own advice. Their screens do not screen for new historic highs, but instead screen for 52 week highs. - - ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2001 07:32:09 -0500 From: "Tom Worley" Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Daily Graphs printed version Both the printed and online show 12 months I consider the online version better value because: a) you have access to all 5000 or so stocks trading, not just the 2000 or so in the books b) data is updated daily c) you can download reports, such as the new high or the index, into Excel and sort according to your preferences, then load the revised list and scroll thru it very easily Both books every other week would cost you nearly $700, you can have DGO daily for about $530. Tom Worley stkguru@netside.net ICQ # 5568838 - ----- Original Message ----- From: Robert McGill To: Sent: Monday, March 26, 2001 1:36 AM Subject: [CANSLIM] Daily Graphs printed version What is the period of time covered in the printed version of the graphs? I am debating the need for having the print copy of the charts. Of course the issue is cost vs utility. It seems that it would just be much easier if you could go through the printed charts to see the formations developing rather than looking at the 52 week highs then looking up the charts to see what is going on. It also seems to me that since O'Neil is looking for solid bases, that getting the charts every 2 weeks should be sufficient. - - - - ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2001 17:16:10 -0800 From: "David Squires" Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Question - symbol is ??? Tom, You are certainly correct Tom, but I was asking a purely technical question on this chart to see what others might say about it. You see, it is the NASDAQ 100 from the last few months turned upside down. Since the bear started I have had a few occurrences when my bullish bias has kept me out of a good short entry. I thought the list would find the exercise interesting and useful. Good Trading, Dave - ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tom Worley" To: Sent: Sunday, March 25, 2001 11:21 AM Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Question - symbol is ??? > David, pretty tough to respond without knowing what stock you are > talking about. I base my decision making on data from DGO, not > someone else's chart. > > Tom Worley > stkguru@netside.net > ICQ # 5568838 > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: David Squires > To: > Sent: Sunday, March 25, 2001 1:37 PM > Subject: [CANSLIM] Question > > > Hi all, > > Is there anyone on this list that would be looking to buy the > pullback in > this stock? > > Is there anyone who would have bought the last pullback to the 50 > day MA? > > Would anyone have bought the retest of the cup and handle > breakout form a > messy handle? > > Good Trading, > > DSquires > > > > - > - - ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2001 20:51:26 -0500 From: Robert Subject: [CANSLIM] Acc/Dis Numbers Here are the latest Acc/Dis Numbers. The %e column is approaching the highest level we have had since 12/4/00 when it peaked at 15%. Date A B C D E AB/A:E %E Market Posture 3/7/01 906 2412 1124 941 380 58% 7% Market in correction 3/8/01 924 2438 1142 919 352 58% 6% Market in correction 3/9/01 964 2404 1166 903 345 58% 6% Market in correction 3/12/01 999 2378 1135 905 359 58% 6% Market in correction 3/13/01 947 2354 1146 924 377 57% 7% Market in correction 3/14/01 815 2233 1196 969 463 54% 8% Market in correction 3/15/01 777 2232 1229 980 456 53% 8% Market in correction 3/16/01 651 2150 1254 1060 518 50% 9% Market in correction 3/19/01 648 2141 1251 1084 514 49% 9% Market in correction 3/20/01 592 2020 1252 1155 595 47% 11% Market in correction 3/21/01 599 2056 1254 1125 578 47% 10% Market in correction 3/22/01 580 2016 1251 1160 593 46% 11% Market in correction 3/23/01 520 1946 1223 1212 666 44% 12% Market in correction 3/26/01 448 1791 1272 1275 744 40% 13% Market in correction Spread sheet version Date,A,B,C,D,E,AB/A:E,%E,Market Posture 3/7/01,906,2412,1124,941,380,58%,7%,Market in correction 3/8/01,924,2438,1142,919,352,58%,6%,Market in correction 3/9/01,964,2404,1166,903,345,58%,6%,Market in correction 3/12/01,999,2378,1135,905,359,58%,6%,Market in correction 3/13/01,947,2354,1146,924,377,57%,7%,Market in correction, 3/14/01,815,2233,1196,969,463,54%,8%,Market in correction, 3/15/01,777,2232,1229,980,456,53%,8%,Market in correction, 3/16/01,651,2150,1254,1060,518,50%,9%,Market in correction, 3/19/01,648,2141,1251,1084,514,49%,9%,Market in correction, 3/20/01,592,2020,1252,1155,595,47%,11%,Market in correction, 3/21/01,599,2056,1254,1125,578,47%,10%,Market in correction, 3/22/01,580,2016,1251,1160,593,46%,11%,Market in correction, 3/23/01,520,1946,1223,1212,666,44%,12%,Market in correction, 3/26/01,448,1791,1272,1275,744,40%,13%,Market in correction, Robert - - ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2001 08:40:07 -0500 From: "Tom Worley" Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Question - symbol is ??? David, reading the chart is only one part of CANSLIM. Without the fundies present as well, the chart is meaningless. From a pure momentum perspective, this exercise might be useful. From a CANSLIM perspective, it proves nothing. And one member figured out your trick anyway. Tom Worley stkguru@netside.net ICQ # 5568838 - ----- Original Message ----- From: David Squires To: Sent: Sunday, March 25, 2001 8:16 PM Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Question - symbol is ??? Tom, You are certainly correct Tom, but I was asking a purely technical question on this chart to see what others might say about it. You see, it is the NASDAQ 100 from the last few months turned upside down. Since the bear started I have had a few occurrences when my bullish bias has kept me out of a good short entry. I thought the list would find the exercise interesting and useful. Good Trading, Dave - ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tom Worley" To: Sent: Sunday, March 25, 2001 11:21 AM Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Question - symbol is ??? > David, pretty tough to respond without knowing what stock you are > talking about. I base my decision making on data from DGO, not > someone else's chart. > > Tom Worley > stkguru@netside.net > ICQ # 5568838 > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: David Squires > To: > Sent: Sunday, March 25, 2001 1:37 PM > Subject: [CANSLIM] Question > > > Hi all, > > Is there anyone on this list that would be looking to buy the > pullback in > this stock? > > Is there anyone who would have bought the last pullback to the 50 > day MA? > > Would anyone have bought the retest of the cup and handle > breakout form a > messy handle? > > Good Trading, > > DSquires > > > > - > - - - - ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2001 09:08:22 -0500 From: "terrell ashe" Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] 52 week high vs historic quandry i `m not sure if we will beable to find a screen that differentiate from 52week high and a" new "52week high. i think we will just have to look at all the charts. - ----- Original Message ----- From: "Robert McGill" To: Sent: Monday, March 26, 2001 1:44 AM Subject: [CANSLIM] 52 week high vs historic quandry > I think that more evidence pointing towards what Tamas said was given in the > 3-26 IBD Investor's Corner when the question was posed to us, ""Will I > embrace stocks beaten to a pulp? Will I buy low, scooping big name techs > that were oversold? Or will I take the high road and buy stocks that race > ahead to new highs?" The answer is then given, "Take the high road". The > discussion follows. The only thing that bothers me here is that DGO does > not seem to follow their own advice. > Their screens do not screen for new historic highs, but instead screen for > 52 week highs. > > > - > - - ------------------------------ Date: 26 Mar 2001 06:57:41 -0800 From: "Tim Fisher" Subject: [CANSLIM] Re: SDH Tom, SDH has a $900m cash buyout offer on the table. Tim Fisher, 1995 President, Pacific Fishery Biologists Ore-ROCK-On Rockhounding Web Site PFB Information mailto:tim@OreRockOn.com WWW http://OreRockOn.com - - ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2001 08:35:31 -0800 From: Tim Fisher Subject: [CANSLIM] Today Looks like some possibly premature breakouts today, the gaming stocks look great, SHFL and ALLY extending their Firday breakouts. Among what I own, THQI looks good today also, in comp. games, maybe there is a gaming theme to the day? Also the homebuilders look awesome today, hope no one went short on them. Anyway it feels strange to see some NASDAQ stocks trading in decimals today. Tim Fisher Ore-Rock-On and Pacific Fishery Biologists WWW Sites Tim@OreRockOn.com WWW: http://OreRockOn.com See naked fish and rocks! - - ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2001 09:51:37 -0800 From: Tim Fisher Subject: [CANSLIM] HGS Watch List See last week's email, for the source and screening criteria. I will not attach the spreadsheet anymore since you can download it yourself for free at http://members.aol.com/~RANord/ Stock ERG E R G A/D SMR Growth Curr Earn Prev Earn Curr Sales Prev Sales Group EPS Due NVR 296 99 99 98 B A 70 107 58 23 14 BUILD_RES 4/27/01 MDC 295 99 98 98 B A 55 54 49 17 9 BUILD_RES 4/18/01 CHBS 294 98 99 97 B A 73 86 363 44 42 RET_CLOTHES 4/5/01 HOV 292 96 98 98 A C 24 147 105 14 19 BUILD_RES 6/7/01 LEN 292 98 96 98 B A 31 88 67 72 78 BUILD_RES 6/20/01 CHIC 292 96 99 97 B A 43 52 41 48 50 RET_CLOTHES 4/13/01 HOTT 292 97 98 97 A A 93 33 55 48 50 RET_CLOTHES 5/15/01 SHFL 291 96 99 96 A A 40 31 69 32 43 LEIS_GAMES 5/22/01 RJR 289 92 98 99 C C 72 25 15 3 6 TOBACCO 4/18/01 SLOT 288 93 99 96 B A 32 34 20 0 9 LEIS_GAMES 4/27/01 WBB 285 93 94 98 B B 19 64 20 -1 2 BUILD_RES 4/25/01 SFD 283 97 93 93 A C 37 86 69 12 16 FOOD_MEATS 6/7/01 PFGC 280 91 94 95 C C 17 24 21 23 30 RETWHL_FOOD 5/2/01 SRCL 279 94 96 89 B A 74 30 16 46 219 POLUTE_SERVICE 5/4/01 RCII 278 97 98 83 A B 36 29 48 11 16 RET_HOMEFURN 5/1/01 UVV 277 81 97 99 B C 18 19 5 -4 -17 TOBACCO 5/4/01 RI 276 95 97 84 B B 27 31 25 1 5 RET_REST 4/11/01 NYCB 274 91 97 86 B A 20 51 7 99 12 BANK_NE 4/12/01 ATK 273 84 97 92 A B 15 14 18 -11 -2 ELEC_MILITARY 5/11/00 ALLY 272 77 99 96 B - NA 180 700 15 2 LEIS_GAMES 5/5/01 GCO 269 92 96 81 B A 19 44 33 26 18 SHOES 02/29/01 BWS 268 89 98 81 A C 49 32 9 14 8 SHOES 5/17/01 SDH 265 83 98 84 B - 34 27 114 6 0 RET_REST 4/6/01 ESI 264 83 96 85 B A 19 122 -22 21 1 COMM_SCHOOL 4/13/01 BKLY 256 77 98 81 B D NA 135 733 14 4 INS_PROP 4/27/01 CEFT 256 98 94 64 B A 47 37 35 32 38 FIN_MISC 4/25/01 SKE 253 80 94 79 B A NA 394 999 307 189 O&G_USEXPL 4/27/01 MND 252 77 96 79 B A NA 232 160 189 53 O&G_USEXPL 5/15/01 TTEN 252 77 96 79 C C NA 338 485 374 451 O&G_USEXPL 4/3/01 HSE 251 77 95 79 B A NA 283 188 114 85 O&G_USEXPL 4/26/01 POG 250 77 94 79 B A NA 110 171 69 47 O&G_USEXPL 4/25/01 TMBR 249 77 93 79 B B NA 356 389 52 78 O&G_USEXPL 5/9/01 HF 248 90 94 64 A A 17 18 22 12 27 FIN_MISC 4/19/01 JHF 248 90 94 64 C C 15 32 21 0 -5 FIN_MISC 5/4/01 THQI 243 82 99 62 A B 76 52 -70 49 20 COMPS_EDU 4/25/01 RDEN 240 72 98 70 A B 20 24 -69 6 12 COSMETIC 3/7/01 Tim Fisher Ore-Rock-On and Pacific Fishery Biologists WWW Sites Tim@OreRockOn.com WWW: http://OreRockOn.com See naked fish and rocks! - - ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2001 11:08:56 -0800 From: Tim Fisher Subject: [CANSLIM] More B/Os Check out SRCL and our old friend SLOT today. Breaking out from decent charts on heavy vol. No, I'm not buying today. Tim Fisher Ore-Rock-On and Pacific Fishery Biologists WWW Sites Tim@OreRockOn.com WWW: http://OreRockOn.com See naked fish and rocks! - - ------------------------------ End of canslim-digest V2 #1231 ****************************** To unsubscribe to canslim-digest, send an email to "majordomo@xmission.com" with "unsubscribe canslim-digest" in the body of the message. For information on digests or retrieving files and old messages send "help" to the same address. Do not use quotes in your message.