From: owner-canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com (canslim-digest) To: canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com Subject: canslim-digest V2 #1260 Reply-To: canslim Sender: owner-canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com Errors-To: owner-canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com Precedence: bulk Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-No-Archive: yes canslim-digest Friday, April 6 2001 Volume 02 : Number 1260 In this issue: Re: [CANSLIM] Economics Re: [CANSLIM] wbb Re: [CANSLIM] EQT Re: [CANSLIM] Markets, Still no fear??? Re: [CANSLIM] Weekly Scan (sorted) Re: [CANSLIM] Markets, Still no fear??? [CANSLIM] Japan's economic stimulus package [CANSLIM] Fw: Today's Earnings Warnings ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2001 22:25:31 -0400 From: "Tom Worley" Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Economics This is a multi-part message in MIME format. - ------=_NextPart_000_00B8_01C0BE1F.53795CA0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Robert, the Philips Curve believes intrinsically that high employment = automatically translates into inflationary pressures. Mr. G did once = support this concept, but that was years ago and well before we had = sustained high employment without corresponding high inflation. Well = over 10 years ago, it was widely perceived that there was a core rate of = unemployment, usually pegged at 5%, below which we were considered = "fully employed", and that inflation was inevitable. Well, we have been = under (and well under) 5% for many years, and Mr. G and the FOMC have = demonstrated that there are other ways of restricting inflation at the = same time as both sustaining high employment and strong economic growth. Go back and read the past half dozen or so of Greenspan's semi-annual = presentations on the Hill. Yes, he remains ever vigilant on inflation = issues, but the ways he monitors and measures the threat of inflation is = not only employment, and often employment is well down the list. A = Philips believer would never do that. Be careful of reading books on = Greenspan, most are (like the old HTMMIS, haven't read the new one yet) = way out of date. Tom Worley stkguru@netside.net ICQ # 5568838 ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Robert McGill=20 To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20 Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2001 9:33 PM Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Economics Maybe someone with more of an economics background could respond but = it is my impression that G believes in the Philips Curve, which says = that high employment leads to inflation. Also he has been repeating = over and over that tight labor mkts lead to wage inflation. Also, = from, "The Greenspan Effect", by Sicilia, there is an entire chpt = devoted to , Chpt 9, "Tight Labor Markets", from pp-70, "The problem = of course, was that labor shortages-more jobs chasing fewer available = workers-would put upward pressure on wages, which could easily translate = into inflation", etc... and from pp-73, "A reemergence of inflation is, = without question, the greatest threat to sustaining what has been a = balanced economic expansion virtually without parallel in recent = decades." From: Tom Worley=20 To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20 Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2001 9:16 PM Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Economics From everything I have read and seen from Mr. G in well over three = years, he would not agree with your statement at all. Tom Worley stkguru@netside.net ICQ # 5568838 ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Robert McGill=20 To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20 Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2001 8:59 AM Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Economics Greenspan wants more unemployment. As an avowed Keynesian he = believes that high employment is conducive to inflation. I do not see = this info being indicative of a rate cut. ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Tom Worley=20 To: CANSLIM=20 Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2001 8:57 AM Subject: [CANSLIM] Economics Initial Jobless Claims report this morning supports a rate cut = before the May FOMC meeting. Monthly Employment Report for tomorrow = expected to show an increase to 4.3% unemployment, and negligible job = creations. Also supports a rate cut soon. Tom Worley stkguru@netside.net ICQ # 5568838 =20 - ------=_NextPart_000_00B8_01C0BE1F.53795CA0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Robert, the Philips Curve believes intrinsically = that high=20 employment automatically translates into inflationary pressures. Mr. G = did once=20 support this concept, but that was years ago and well before we had = sustained=20 high employment without corresponding high inflation.  Well over 10 = years=20 ago, it was widely perceived that there was a core rate of unemployment, = usually=20 pegged at 5%, below which we were considered "fully employed", and that=20 inflation was inevitable. Well, we have been under (and well under) 5% = for many=20 years, and Mr. G and the FOMC have demonstrated that there are other = ways of=20 restricting inflation at the same time as both sustaining high = employment and=20 strong economic growth.
 
Go back and read the past half dozen or so of = Greenspan's=20 semi-annual presentations on the Hill. Yes, he remains ever vigilant on=20 inflation issues, but the ways he monitors and measures the threat of = inflation=20 is not only employment, and often employment is well down the list. A = Philips=20 believer would never do that. Be careful of reading books on Greenspan, = most are=20 (like the old HTMMIS, haven't read the new one yet) way out of=20 date.

Tom Worley
stkguru@netside.net
ICQ # = 5568838
 
 
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Robert McGill
To: canslim@lists.xmission.com =
Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2001 = 9:33=20 PM
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] = Economics

Maybe someone with more of an economics background = could=20 respond but it is my impression that G believes in the Philips Curve, = which=20 says that high employment leads to inflation.  Also he has been = repeating=20 over and over that tight labor mkts lead to wage inflation.  = Also, =20 from, "The Greenspan Effect", by Sicilia, there is an entire chpt = devoted to ,=20 Chpt 9, "Tight Labor Markets",   from pp-70, "The = problem of=20 course, was that labor shortages-more jobs chasing fewer available=20 workers-would put upward pressure on wages, which could easily = translate into=20 inflation", etc...  and from pp-73, "A = reemergence of=20 inflation is, without question, the greatest threat to sustaining what = has=20 been a balanced economic expansion virtually without parallel in = recent=20 decades."
From:=20 Tom=20 Worley
To: canslim@lists.xmission.com =
Sent: Thursday, April 05, = 2001 9:16=20 PM
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] = Economics

From everything I have read and seen from Mr. G = in well=20 over three years, he would not agree with your statement at=20 all.

Tom Worley
stkguru@netside.net
ICQ # = 5568838
 
 
----- Original Message ----- =
From:=20 Robert McGill
To: canslim@lists.xmission.com =
Sent: Thursday, April 05, = 2001 8:59=20 AM
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM]=20 Economics

Greenspan wants more unemployment.  As an = avowed=20 Keynesian he believes that high employment is conducive to=20 inflation.  I do not see this info being indicative of a rate = cut.
----- Original Message ----- =
From:=20 Tom=20 Worley
To: CANSLIM
Sent: Thursday, April 05, = 2001 8:57=20 AM
Subject: [CANSLIM] = Economics

Initial Jobless Claims report this morning = supports a=20 rate cut before the May FOMC meeting. Monthly Employment Report = for=20 tomorrow expected to show an increase to 4.3% unemployment, and=20 negligible job creations.  Also supports a rate cut=20 soon.

Tom Worley
stkguru@netside.net
ICQ #=20 5568838
 
 
- ------=_NextPart_000_00B8_01C0BE1F.53795CA0-- - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2001 22:34:21 -0400 From: "Tom Worley" Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] wbb This is a multi-part message in MIME format. - ------=_NextPart_000_00CC_01C0BE20.8FDB03A0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable wbbNancy, the "ideal" cup and handle will show a smooth cup, with the = bottom no more than about 25% below the difference between the left side = of the cup, and the price where the prior upward trend started. In other = words, the cup gives up no more than 25% of the prior leg up. If the cup = gives up 50% or more, it should be avoided. The handle should form a relatively tight trading range, trend down = slightly, and show declining volume by the time it gets out to the = second week. This signifies that the sellers are disappearing, and yet = there are buyers for the few left sufficient to keep the price from a = significant decline. All this, of course, is moot with a tender offer on the table. Tom Worley stkguru@netside.net ICQ # 5568838 ----- Original Message -----=20 From: DiFabio, Nancy=20 To: 'canslim@lists.xmission.com'=20 Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2001 8:49 PM Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] wbb Hugh, =20 Thanks for taking the time to address my question. Please explain the = part about the handle dropping quickly on high volume. Is it because we = are looking for the volume to dry up at this point? Can the handle = redeem itself by recorrecting on low volume? Am I on ther right track = here? =20 =20 Thanks for your help. =20 Nancy -----Original Message----- From: Hugh Fader [mailto:hfader@usa.net] Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2001 5:32 PM To: canslim@lists.xmission.com Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] wbb Nancy, =20 The rule is the midpoint of the handle should be above the midpoint = of the cup. Also the handle should dip no more than 15%. Also the handle = should drift downward on falling volume. =20 It looks like WBB has the beginning of the handle. The midpoint of = the cup and the handle are at about 30, so it's marginal by that = measure. The handle dips about 12% so OK there. The handle dropped = quickly on higher volume. For these reasons, I would say the formation = is not a good cup with handle. =20 - Hugh -----Original Message----- From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com = [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of DiFabio, Nancy Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2001 12:16 PM To: Canslim (E-mail) Subject: [CANSLIM] wbb Should I be worried about the handle on WBB? Has it fallen too = low?=20 Nancy=20 "WorldSecure " made the following annotations on 04/05/01 09:14:14 = - -------------------------------------------------------------------------= - ----- PLEASE NOTE: This message, including any attachments, may include = privileged, confidential and/or inside information. Any distribution or = use of this communication by anyone other than the intended recipient(s) = is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not the intended = recipient, please notify the sender by replying to this message and then = delete it from your system. Thank you. = =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D "WorldSecure " made the following annotations on 04/05/01 17:48:13 = - -------------------------------------------------------------------------= - ----- PLEASE NOTE: This message, including any attachments, may include = privileged, confidential and/or inside information. Any distribution or = use of this communication by anyone other than the intended recipient(s) = is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not the intended = recipient, please notify the sender by replying to this message and then = delete it from your system. Thank you. = =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D - ------=_NextPart_000_00CC_01C0BE20.8FDB03A0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable wbb
Nancy, the "ideal" cup and handle will show a smooth = cup, with=20 the bottom no more than about 25% below the difference between the left = side of=20 the cup, and the price where the prior upward trend started. In other = words, the=20 cup gives up no more than 25% of the prior leg up. If the cup gives up = 50% or=20 more, it should be avoided.
 
The handle should form a relatively tight trading = range, trend=20 down slightly, and show declining volume by the time it gets out to the = second=20 week. This signifies that the sellers are disappearing, and yet there = are buyers=20 for the few left sufficient to keep the price from a significant=20 decline.
 
All this, of course, is moot with a tender offer on = the=20 table.

Tom Worley
stkguru@netside.net
ICQ # = 5568838
 
 
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 DiFabio,=20 Nancy
To: 'canslim@lists.xmission.com' =
Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2001 = 8:49=20 PM
Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] = wbb

Hugh,
 
Thanks for taking the time to address my question.  = Please explain=20 the part about the handle dropping quickly on high volume.  Is it = because=20 we are looking for the volume to dry up at this point? Can the handle = redeem=20 itself by recorrecting on low volume? Am I on = ther=20 right track here? 
 
Thanks for your = help.
 
Nancy
-----Original Message-----
From: Hugh Fader=20 [mailto:hfader@usa.net]
Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2001 = 5:32=20 PM
To: canslim@lists.xmission.com
Subject: RE: = [CANSLIM]=20 wbb

Nancy,
 
The rule is the midpoint of the handle should be above the = midpoint=20 of the cup. Also the handle should dip no more than 15%. Also the = handle=20 should drift downward on falling volume.
 
It looks like WBB has the beginning of the handle. = The=20 midpoint of the cup and the handle are at about 30, so it's marginal = by that=20 measure. The handle dips about 12% so OK there. The handle = dropped=20 quickly on higher volume. For these reasons, I would say the = formation is=20 not a good cup with handle.
 
-=20 Hugh
-----Original Message-----
From:=20 owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com=20 [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of = DiFabio,=20 Nancy
Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2001 12:16 = PM
To:=20 Canslim (E-mail)
Subject: [CANSLIM] = wbb


Should I be worried about the = handle on=20 WBB?  Has it fallen too low?

Nancy

"WorldSecure <irell.com>" made the = following
annotations on=20 04/05/01=20 = 09:14:14
-------------------------------------------------------------= - -----------------
PLEASE=20 NOTE: This message, including any attachments, may include = privileged,=20 confidential and/or inside information. Any distribution or use of = this=20 communication by anyone other than the intended recipient(s) is = strictly=20 prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not the intended = recipient,=20 please notify the sender by replying to this message and then = delete it=20 from your system. Thank=20 = you.


=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D

"WorldSecure <irell.com>" made the following
annotations = on=20 04/05/01=20 = 17:48:13
-------------------------------------------------------------= - -----------------
PLEASE=20 NOTE: This message, including any attachments, may include privileged, = confidential and/or inside information. Any distribution or use of = this=20 communication by anyone other than the intended recipient(s) is = strictly=20 prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not the intended recipient, = please=20 notify the sender by replying to this message and then delete it from = your=20 system. Thank=20 = you.


=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D

- ------=_NextPart_000_00CC_01C0BE20.8FDB03A0-- - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2001 22:54:05 -0400 From: "Tom Worley" Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] EQT You had a nice cup, and an ok handle (mostly because volume did not dry up) that formed around 65. I mark the pivot at 66.75. Now, at 73.60, it's over 10% extended. Energy groups are doing well, so I have my doubts that it may pull back to the handle. But I would want to wait for another basing formation. I note ROE is only 16%, likely due the sharp drop in earnings in 1998, so that doesn't concern me since more recent earnings are strong. I also note that the forecast for 2002 is only a gain of 10%, again I have been seeing this a lot on energy stocks, and suspect it says more about the analysts ability to forecast future pricing, and thereby profits. I also see that funds have 34% of the float, essentially same as the issue as management only owns 2%. Again, not that unusual on mature energy stocks, but doesn't leave a lot of room for renewed funds buying. Tom Worley stkguru@netside.net ICQ # 5568838 - ----- Original Message ----- From: Dave Massaglia To: Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2001 1:28 PM Subject: [CANSLIM] EQT This stock appears to be strong and I believe fits CANSLIM.....is there a good buy point that jumps out? _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2001 22:56:35 -0400 From: "Tom Worley" Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Markets, Still no fear??? The dominant theme seems to be, stocks are cheap. Especially big cap, big name, formerly powerful leaders in the tech sector. It's hard to maintain a strong bearish sentiment in light of that kind of thinking. Tom Worley stkguru@netside.net ICQ # 5568838 - ----- Original Message ----- From: Bill Triffet To: canslim Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2001 3:33 PM Subject: [CANSLIM] Markets, Still no fear??? Without reading to much into this market today, it sure looks like fear is STILL not to be found. Managers are still too eager to stuff that money back into the market. Where can this go from here with the Put/Call ratio below .8 and Bullish sentiment still above 48%. I do see the Bearish sentiment is up to 39% but I would hope to see this much higher for this to really turn around. Comments? - -Bill Triffet - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2001 21:10:59 -0700 From: Joe Maguire Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Weekly Scan (sorted) kent .I'd look forward to tour list...thx Joe Maguire Kent Norman wrote: > OK, here is the list sorted by the number of times a > symbol occurs. > Regards > Kent Norman > > TARO 9 > CNX 8 > CP 8 > ESCM 8 > SHFL 8 > ADVP 7 > CHIC 7 > MEE 7 > ULGX 7 > AGY 6 > ANF 6 > CEC 6 > COTT 6 > CSX 6 > FLM 6 > MTON 6 > THQI 6 > VTIV 6 > WIN 6 > ACI 5 > ATVI 5 > CECO 5 > DDS 5 > FWC 5 > GTK 5 > HOTT 5 > ITG 5 > LEN 5 > NVDA 5 > RCII 5 > SDH 5 > SFD 5 > SIAL 5 > SKX 5 > SLOT 5 > TOY 5 > ACF 4 > BGC 4 > BPT 4 > BUCA 4 > CNI 4 > CPN 4 > EC 4 > JEC 4 > MAT 4 > OO 4 > TIER 4 > WG 4 > WTSLA 4 > ZQK 4 > BBI 3 > CA 3 > CIT 3 > ERTS 3 > FD 3 > HOV 3 > LDG 3 > PLCE 3 > RAYS 3 > RI 3 > SLVN 3 > STZ 3 > ASD 2 > AWK 2 > CHBS 2 > DBRSY 2 > EFDS 2 > EFNT 2 > FB 2 > FO 2 > GPSI 2 > HF 2 > MCCC 2 > TOS 2 > USAI 2 > VC 2 > VPHM 2 > YUM 2 > ADSK 1 > ADTN 1 > ALLC 1 > ALLY 1 > AMBC 1 > AMD 1 > AMHC 1 > AOL 1 > APL 1 > APPB 1 > ARLP 1 > ASMI 1 > ATK 1 > BAC 1 > BARI 1 > BEAV 1 > BGP 1 > BHAG 1 > BJ 1 > BOH 1 > BOL 1 > BSB 1 > BSX 1 > BWS 1 > CAPX 1 > CATT 1 > CBNY 1 > CBT 1 > CCU 1 > CHCS 1 > CITC 1 > CNB 1 > CNC 1 > CRM 1 > CROS 1 > CTX 1 > CX 1 > DAKT 1 > DCN 1 > DKWD 1 > DOM 1 > DORL 1 > DYII 1 > EFII 1 > EFX 1 > ELN 1 > ELY 1 > ENR 1 > EPIQ 1 > EXCO 1 > FBNC 1 > FCNCA 1 > FDC 1 > FDO 1 > FFD 1 > FFFL 1 > FFLC 1 > FISI 1 > FMN 1 > FOX 1 > FTU 1 > GCO 1 > GMP 1 > GRIF 1 > GTIV 1 > HDVS 1 > HIB 1 > HOC 1 > HOFF 1 > HRB 1 > IBIS 1 > ICIX 1 > IPK 1 > IRF 1 > JCI 1 > JCP 1 > JNY 1 > JRBK 1 > KOSS 1 > KTCO 1 > LIZ 1 > LOW 1 > LRCX 1 > LZ 1 > MARPS 1 > MAXS 1 > MBFI 1 > MDC 1 > MDR 1 > MHO 1 > MIKE 1 > MINI 1 > MIR 1 > MKC 1 > MKSI 1 > MON 1 > MRS 1 > MSFT 1 > MU 1 > NAFC 1 > NAUT 1 > NSC 1 > NVR 1 > NWL 1 > NXL 1 > NYCB 1 > OLOG 1 > ORN 1 > PANRA 1 > PCCI 1 > PHSY 1 > PIR 1 > PKS 1 > PKX 1 > POWI 1 > RBKV 1 > RDEN 1 > REBC 1 > RHT 1 > RJR 1 > RMCI 1 > ROIA 1 > ROME 1 > ROST 1 > SEE 1 > SFA 1 > SLAB 1 > SMTC 1 > SRCL 1 > STU 1 > SYMC 1 > T 1 > TJX 1 > TKCI 1 > TRR 1 > TSM 1 > TTI 1 > TUP 1 > UDI 1 > UDR 1 > UDS 1 > VGR 1 > VLCCF 1 > VSEA 1 > VSH 1 > WLB 1 > WON 1 > WTU 1 > YORW 1 > YZC 1 > > --- David Squires wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > For those interested here is one of my weekly scans. > > Granted it is not a > > small number of stocks but we don't get paid without > > doing some work. The > > spreadsheet is the result of about 13 different > > scans. There are many > > repeats and that tells you there was a lot of hits > > on that stock..this is > > good. The scan searches for strong earnings growth > > or strong revenue growth, > > high RS, increasing margins, earnings drift, new > > highs, institution holding > > increases, and high RS with a value filter. All > > scans have a minimum RS > > filter, minimum volume filter and minimum price > > filter. If anyone finds this > > useful email me privately and I will continue to > > post it. > > > > Good Trading, > > DSquires > > > > > ATTACHMENT part 2 application/vnd.ms-excel > name=Weekly Scan.xls > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail. > http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/?.refer=text > > - > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2001 22:15:47 -0700 From: "Bill Triffet" Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Markets, Still no fear??? Maybe after months of recomending these beat down leaders the advisors of the world may for once be right! (g) I love when IBD shows those little charts of advisors stock recommendations as they continue to head south. I'm starting to feel it's time for a recovery though I'll certainly be surprised if it starts with a 400 point gain of confidence. Then again I could be completely wrong. Tommorrows employment report should help shed some light. Btw, as a mini indicator, many of my co-workers have told me they've recently shifted portions of their 401k out of stock funds to bonds and MM's. It's a start... - -Bill Triffet - ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tom Worley" To: Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2001 7:56 PM Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Markets, Still no fear??? > The dominant theme seems to be, stocks are cheap. Especially big > cap, big name, formerly powerful leaders in the tech sector. > > It's hard to maintain a strong bearish sentiment in light of that > kind of thinking. > > Tom Worley > stkguru@netside.net > ICQ # 5568838 - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2001 07:12:02 -0400 From: "Tom Worley" Subject: [CANSLIM] Japan's economic stimulus package This is a multi-part message in MIME format. - ------=_NextPart_000_000D_01C0BE68.E2325700 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Well, so much for the long touted package, finally released on Friday, = that was going to revitalize the world's # 2 economy from recession. = Looks like mostly talk and appearances, not enough money to make a = difference or cure any of the banking sector's problems. The banking = sector closed down 4% as a result. Worth noting that Japan separately approved a requirement that banks = will have to "mark to market" their capital portfolio. That is going to = really flush out into the open the losses that banks are concealing. = Seems the package will do little to clean up the bad loans they are = carrying, will only force, over the next 2-3 years, the write-off of = loans that are already so in default that they are functionally dead. = The bulk of the bad loans, called "gray zone", can continue to be = carried on their books even tho non performing. Why am I not surprised? Tom Worley stkguru@netside.net ICQ # 5568838 - ------=_NextPart_000_000D_01C0BE68.E2325700 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Well, so much for the long touted package, finally = released on=20 Friday, that was going to revitalize the world's # 2 economy from=20 recession.  Looks like mostly talk and appearances, not enough = money to=20 make a difference or cure any of the banking sector's problems.  = The=20 banking sector closed down 4% as a result.
 
Worth noting that Japan separately approved a = requirement=20 that banks will have to "mark to market" their capital portfolio. That = is going=20 to really flush out into the open the losses that banks are concealing. = Seems=20 the package will do little to clean up the bad loans they are carrying, = will=20 only force, over the next 2-3 years, the write-off of loans that are = already so=20 in default that they are functionally dead.  The bulk of the bad = loans,=20 called "gray zone", can continue to be carried on their books even tho = non=20 performing.
 
Why am I not surprised?

Tom Worley
stkguru@netside.net
ICQ #=20 5568838
 
 
- ------=_NextPart_000_000D_01C0BE68.E2325700-- - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2001 08:10:46 -0400 From: "Tom Worley" Subject: [CANSLIM] Fw: Today's Earnings Warnings This is a multi-part message in MIME format. - ------=_NextPart_000_0034_01C0BE71.1A791A60 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable EarningsWhispers.comIt's really amazing some times just how earnings = warnings are handled during a bull rally. This is yesterday's reports, = worth noting the number of stocks that closed up despite warning they = would fail either earnings or revenue forecasts. Tom Worley stkguru@netside.net ICQ # 5568838 - ----- Original Message -----=20 From: EarningsWhispers.com=20 To: Earnings Warnings Emails=20 Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2001 5:18 PM Subject: Today's Earnings Warnings =20 =20 =20 Today's Earnings Warnings =20 View Previous Warnings =20 Pantry $9 1/8 1/4 =20 Article Whisper Discussion Pantry (PTRY) warned they would post a loss for the = second quarter. Consensus estimates are a profit of .06 per share. The = company stated they would post a loss of .16-.18 per share. =20 =20 =20 Pioneer-Standard $11 7/16 $1 1/8 =20 Whisper Discussion Pioneer-Standard (PIOS) warned they would fall short of = fourth quarter EPS estimates. Consensus estimates are .34 per share. The = company stated they would post .25-.30 per share. =20 =20 =20 net.Genesis $1 11/16 ($0.062) =20 Article Whisper Discussion net.Genesis (NTGX) warned they would miss first quarter = EPS estimates. Consensus is a loss of .32 per share. The company stated = they would post a loss of .55-.60 per share. =20 =20 =20 Elizabeth Arden $15 =20 Article Whisper Discussion Elizabeth Arden (RDEN) announced they would top FY02 = EPS estimates. Consensus is $1.55 per share. The company stated they = would post $1.55-1.75 per share. =20 =20 =20 BMC Software $23.300 $4.220 =20 Article Whisper Discussion BMC Software (BMC) announced they would beat revenue = estimates for the fourth quarter. Consensus estimates are $407 million. = The company stated they would post $412-422 million. The consensus EPS = estimates are .24 per share. =20 =20 =20 Cyberonics $15 3/16 5/16 =20 Article Whisper Discussion Cyberonics (CYBX) announced they would top revenue = estimates for the third quarter. Analysts were expecting $13.8 million. = The company is expecting to post $14.3 million. Consensus EPS estimates = are a loss of .17 per share. =20 =20 =20 Intraware $1 1/16 ($0.031) =20 Article Whisper Discussion Intraware (ITRA) announced they would beat first = quarter EPS estimates. A loss of .28 was expected. The company is going = to post a loss of .09-.11 per share. =20 =20 =20 Talarian $2 9/16 ($0.312) =20 Article Whisper Discussion Talarian (TALR) announced they would top second quarter = EPS estimates. Analysts are expecting a loss of .20 per share. The = company stated they would post a loss of .17-.19 per share. =20 =20 =20 Delano Tech $1 21/32 ($0.157) =20 Article Whisper Discussion Delano Tech (DTEC) warned they would fall short of = fourth quarter EPS estimates. The company warned they would post a = bigger loss than previously expected. Consensus estimates are a loss of = 27 per share. The company is expecting a loss of .36-.38 per share. =20 =20 =20 Agilent Tech $30.620 $2.530 =20 Article Whisper Discussion Agilent Technology (A) warned on second quarter = earnings estimates. The company announced they would not meet revenue = estimates for the quarter. Consensus EPS estimates are .34 per share. =20 =20 =20 ESPS Inc $1 7/16 ($0.250) =20 Article Whisper Discussion ESPS (ESPS) warned they would miss fourth quarter EPS = estimates. Consensus estimates are a profit of .01 per share. The = company stated they would post a loss of .11-.15 per share. =20 =20 =20 Marvell Tech $8 15/16 $0.407 =20 Article Whisper Discussion Marvell Tech (MRVL) warned they would fall short of = first quarter EPS estimates. Analysts were expecting .06 per share. The = company stated they would post "about .04" per share. =20 =20 =20 Hyperion Solutions $15 7/8 $2 =20 Article Whisper Discussion Hyperion Solutions (HYSL) warned they would fall short = of third quarter EPS estimates. Consensus is .07 per share. The company = stated they would post in the range of a loss of .04 per share, to a = profit of .01 per share. =20 =20 =20 Autonomy $8 3/8 1/2 =20 Article Whisper Discussion Autonomy (AUTN) warned they would narrowly miss third = quarter EPS estimates of .05 per share. The company stated they would = post "about .04" per share. =20 =20 =20 Extreme Networks $16.010 $3.280 =20 Article Whisper Discussion Extreme Networks (EXTR) warned they would miss third = quarter EPS estimates. Consensus estimates are .12 per share, profit. = The company stated they would post a loss, of .06-.08 per share. =20 =20 =20 Management Networks $5 1/8 3/8 =20 Article Whisper Discussion Management Networks (TMNG) warned they would fall short = of first quarter estimates. Conensus estimates are .14 per share. The = company stated they would miss that, posting .10-.11 per share. =20 =20 =20 Sycamore Networks $9 1/16 $1.407 =20 Article Whisper Discussion Sycamore Networks (SCMR) warned they would not meet = first quarter EPS estimates. Consensus estimates are a profit of .05 per = share. The company stated they would post a substantial loss, of .16-.19 = per share. =20 =20 =20 Urologix $19 3/4 ($0.500) =20 Article Whisper Discussion Urologix (ULGX) announced they would top revenue = estimates for the third quarter. Consensus estimates are $4 million. The = company stated they would top that, posting $4.5 million. Consensus EPS = estimates for the quarter are a loss of .10 per share. =20 =20 =20 RADVision $7 27/32 =20 Article Whisper Discussion RADVision (RVSN) warned they could possibly miss first = quarter EPS estimates. Consensus is .09 per share. The company stated = they would post in the range of .08-.09 per share. =20 =20 =20 inSilicon $2 15/16 ($0.187) =20 Article Whisper Discussion inSilicon (INSN) warned they would miss second quarter = EPS estimates. Consensus is a profit of .03 per share. The company = stated they would post a loss of .11-.14 per share. =20 =20 =20 webMethods $19 $2 =20 Article Whisper Discussion webMethods (WEBM) warned they would miss fourth quarter = EPS estimates. Consensus is a profit of .06 per share. The company = stated they would post EPS of .00- a loss of .03 per share. =20 =20 =20 Neiman-Marcus $32.150 $1.070 =20 Article Whisper Discussion Neiman-Marcus (NMG.A) warned they would not meet = analysts estimates for the third quarter. Analysts were expecting $1.02 = per share. The company lowered that to the range of .80-.85 per share. =20 =20 =20 Emulex $17 $4 1/2 =20 Article Whisper Discussion Emulex (EMLX) warned they would fall short of third = quarter EPS estimates. Analysts are expecting .20 per share. The company = stated they would post "about .13" per share.=20 =20 =20 Friedman's $5 31/32 ($0.156) =20 Article Whisper Discussion Friedman's (FRDM) warned they would miss second quarter = EPS estimates. Consensus estimates are .23 per share. The company stated = they would post in the range of .18-.21 per share. =20 =20 =20 Superior Industries $35 1/4 $1.310 =20 Article Whisper Discussion Superior Industries (SUP) warned they would fall short = of first quarter EPS estimates. Consensus estimates are .63 per share. = The company stated they would narrowly miss that, posting "about .61" = per share. =20 =20 =20 ACE Cash Express $8 1/16 ($3.875) =20 Article Whisper Discussion ACE Cash Express (AACE) warned they would miss third = quarter EPS estimates. Consensus is a profit of .58 per share. The = company stated they would miss that, posting a significant loss. The = company is expecting to post a loss of .41-.43 per share. =20 =20 =20 Unsubscribe =20 Feedback | Copyright | Usage Agreement | Privacy Policy | = Advertising | About Us | Contact Us | FAQ =20 Quotes are delayed by 20 minutes. Quotes provided by North = American Quotations. All other information provided by EarningsWhispers.com. EarningsWhispers.com, Whisper Report, and Earnings Whisper numbers = are registered trade marks of EarningsWhispers.com. Copyright =A9 2000 EarningsWhispers.com. All rights reserved. =20 - ------=_NextPart_000_0034_01C0BE71.1A791A60 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable EarningsWhispers.com
It's really amazing some times = just how=20 earnings warnings are handled during a bull rally. This is yesterday's = reports,=20 worth noting the number of stocks that closed up despite warning they = would fail=20 either earnings or revenue forecasts.

Tom Worley
stkguru@netside.net
ICQ #=20 5568838
 
 
----- Original Message -----=20
From: EarningsWhispers.com
Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2001 5:18 PM
Subject: Today's Earnings Warnings

 
3Dwww.Scottrade.com 3Dwww.Scottrade.com =

Today's = Earnings=20 Warnings
View = Previous=20 Warnings

Pantry $9=20 1/8   1/4    

Article
Whisper=
Discu= ssion

 Pantry (PTRY)=20 warned they would post a loss for the second quarter.=20 Consensus estimates are a profit of .06 per share. The = company=20 stated they would post a loss of .16-.18 per share.=20 =
Pioneer-Standard $11=20 7/16   $1=20 1/8    

Whisper=
Discu= ssion

 Pioneer-Standard=20 (PIOS)=20 warned they would fall short of fourth quarter EPS = estimates.=20 Consensus estimates are .34 per share. The company = stated they=20 would post .25-.30 per share.=20 =
net.Genesis $1=20 11/16   ($0.062)    

Article
Whisper=
Discu= ssion

 net.Genesis (NTGX)=20 warned they would miss first quarter EPS estimates. = Consensus=20 is a loss of .32 per share. The company stated they = would post=20 a loss of .55-.60 per share.=20 =
Elizabeth=20 Arden $15          
=

Article
Whisper=
Discu= ssion

 Elizabeth Arden=20 (RDE= N)=20 announced they would top FY02 EPS estimates. Consensus = is=20 $1.55 per share. The company stated they would post = $1.55-1.75=20 per share.=20 =
BMC=20 Software $23.300   $4.220    

Article
Whisper<= /A>
Discus= sion

 BMC = Software (BMC)= =20 announced they would beat revenue estimates for the = fourth=20 quarter. Consensus estimates are $407 million. The = company=20 stated they would post $412-422 million. The consensus = EPS=20 estimates are .24 per share.=20 =
Cyberonics $15=20 3/16   5/16    

Article
Whisper=
Discu= ssion

 Cyberonics (CYBX)=20 announced they would top revenue estimates for the = third=20 quarter. Analysts were expecting $13.8 million. The = company is=20 expecting to post $14.3 million. Consensus EPS = estimates are a=20 loss of .17 per share.=20 =
Intraware $1=20 1/16   ($0.031)    

Article
Whisper=
Discu= ssion

 Intraware (ITRA)=20 announced they would beat first quarter EPS estimates. = A loss=20 of .28 was expected. The company is going to post a = loss of=20 .09-.11 per share.=20 =
Talarian $2=20 9/16   ($0.312)    

Article
Whisper=
Discu= ssion

 Talarian (TALR)=20 announced they would top second quarter EPS estimates. = Analysts are expecting a loss of .20 per share. The = company=20 stated they would post a loss of .17-.19 per share.=20 =
Delano=20 Tech $1=20 21/32   ($0.157)    

Article
Whisper=
Discu= ssion

 Delano Tech (DTEC)=20 warned they would fall short of fourth quarter EPS = estimates.=20 The company warned they would post a bigger loss than=20 previously expected. Consensus estimates are a loss of = 27 per=20 share. The company is expecting a loss of .36-.38 per = share.=20 =
Agilent=20 Tech $30.620   $2.530    

Article
Whisper
Discussi= on

 Agilent=20 Technology (A)=20 warned on second quarter earnings estimates. The = company=20 announced they would not meet revenue estimates for = the=20 quarter. Consensus EPS estimates are .34 per share.=20 =
ESPS = Inc $1=20 7/16   ($0.250)    

Article
Whisper=
Discu= ssion

 ESPS = (ESPS)=20 warned they would miss fourth quarter EPS estimates. = Consensus=20 estimates are a profit of .01 per share. The company = stated=20 they would post a loss of .11-.15 per share.=20 =
Marvell=20 Tech $8=20 15/16   $0.407    

Article
Whisper=
Discu= ssion

 Marvell Tech (MRVL)=20 warned they would fall short of first quarter EPS = estimates.=20 Analysts were expecting .06 per share. The company = stated they=20 would post "about .04" per share.=20 =
Hyperion=20 Solutions $15=20 7/8   $2    

Article
Whisper=
Discu= ssion

 Hyperion=20 Solutions (HYSL)=20 warned they would fall short of third quarter EPS = estimates.=20 Consensus is .07 per share. The company stated they = would post=20 in the range of a loss of .04 per share, to a profit = of .01=20 per share.=20 =
Autonomy $8=20 3/8   1/2    

Article
Whisper=
Discu= ssion

 Autonomy (AUTN)=20 warned they would narrowly miss third quarter EPS = estimates of=20 .05 per share. The company stated they would post = "about .04"=20 per share.=20 =
Extreme=20 Networks $16.010   $3.280    

Article
Whisper=
Discu= ssion

 Extreme Networks=20 (EXTR)=20 warned they would miss third quarter EPS estimates. = Consensus=20 estimates are .12 per share, profit. The company = stated they=20 would post a loss, of .06-.08 per share.=20 =
Management=20 Networks $5=20 1/8   3/8    

Article
Whisper=
Discu= ssion

 Management=20 Networks (TMNG)=20 warned they would fall short of first quarter = estimates.=20 Conensus estimates are .14 per share. The company = stated they=20 would miss that, posting .10-.11 per share.=20 =
Sycamore=20 Networks $9=20 1/16   $1.407    

Article
Whisper=
Discu= ssion

 Sycamore Networks=20 (SCMR)=20 warned they would not meet first quarter EPS = estimates.=20 Consensus estimates are a profit of .05 per share. The = company=20 stated they would post a substantial loss, of .16-.19 = per=20 share.=20 =
Urologix $19=20 3/4   ($0.500)    

Article
Whisper=
Discu= ssion

 Urologix (ULGX)=20 announced they would top revenue estimates for the = third=20 quarter. Consensus estimates are $4 million. The = company=20 stated they would top that, posting $4.5 million. = Consensus=20 EPS estimates for the quarter are a loss of .10 per = share.=20 =
RADVision $7   27/32    

Article
Whisper=
Discu= ssion

 RADVision (RVSN)=20 warned they could possibly miss first quarter EPS = estimates.=20 Consensus is .09 per share. The company stated they = would post=20 in the range of .08-.09 per share.=20 =
inSilicon $2=20 15/16   ($0.187)    

Article
Whisper=
Discu= ssion

 inSilicon (INSN)=20 warned they would miss second quarter EPS estimates. = Consensus=20 is a profit of .03 per share. The company stated they = would=20 post a loss of .11-.14 per share.=20 =
webMethods $19   $2    

Article
Whisper=
Discu= ssion

 webMethods (WEBM)=20 warned they would miss fourth quarter EPS estimates. = Consensus=20 is a profit of .06 per share. The company stated they = would=20 post EPS of .00- a loss of .03 per share.=20 =
Neiman-Marcus $32.150   $1.070    

Article
Whispe= r
Disc= ussion

 Neiman-Marcus (NMG.A<= /A>)=20 warned they would not meet analysts estimates for the = third=20 quarter. Analysts were expecting $1.02 per share. The = company=20 lowered that to the range of .80-.85 per share.=20 =
Emulex $17   $4=20 1/2    

Article
Whisper=
Discu= ssion

 Emulex (EMLX)=20 warned they would fall short of third quarter EPS = estimates.=20 Analysts are expecting .20 per share. The company = stated they=20 would post "about .13" per=20 = share.
Friedman's $5=20 31/32   ($0.156)    

Article
Whisper=
Discu= ssion

 Friedman's (FRDM)=20 warned they would miss second quarter EPS estimates. = Consensus=20 estimates are .23 per share. The company stated they = would=20 post in the range of .18-.21 per share.=20 =
Superior=20 Industries $35=20 1/4   $1.310    

Article
Whisper<= /A>
Discus= sion

 Superior=20 Industries (SUP)= =20 warned they would fall short of first quarter EPS = estimates.=20 Consensus estimates are .63 per share. The company = stated they=20 would narrowly miss that, posting "about .61" per = share.=20 =
ACE = Cash=20 Express $8=20 1/16   ($3.875)    

Article
Whisper=
Discu= ssion

 ACE = Cash Express=20 (AACE)=20 warned they would miss third quarter EPS estimates. = Consensus=20 is a profit of .58 per share. The company stated they = would=20 miss that, posting a significant loss. The company is=20 expecting to post a loss of .41-.43 per share.=20 =


Unsubscribe<= BR>
Feedback | Copyright | Usage=20 Agreement | Privacy=20 Policy | Advertising | About Us | Contact = Us | FAQ 

Quotes = are delayed=20 by 20 minutes. Quotes provided by North=20 American Quotations.
All other information = provided by=20 EarningsWhispers.com.
EarningsWhispers.com, = Whisper=20 Report, and Earnings Whisper numbers are registered trade marks of = EarningsWhispers.com.
Copyright =A9 2000 EarningsWhispers.com. = All rights=20 reserved.
- ------=_NextPart_000_0034_01C0BE71.1A791A60-- - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ End of canslim-digest V2 #1260 ****************************** To unsubscribe to canslim-digest, send an email to "majordomo@xmission.com" with "unsubscribe canslim-digest" in the body of the message. For information on digests or retrieving files and old messages send "help" to the same address. Do not use quotes in your message.