From: owner-canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com (canslim-digest) To: canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com Subject: canslim-digest V2 #1419 Reply-To: canslim Sender: owner-canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com Errors-To: owner-canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com Precedence: bulk Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-No-Archive: yes canslim-digest Wednesday, May 30 2001 Volume 02 : Number 1419 In this issue: Re: [CANSLIM] Re: Anyone watching WMS today? Opinions? Re: [CANSLIM] My Leader's List - ACF comments Re: [CANSLIM] Re: Anyone watching WMS today? Opinions? Re: [CANSLIM] My Leader's List - ACF comments Re: [CANSLIM] climax top? Re: [CANSLIM] Camslim[indicator Discussion} Re: [CANSLIM] Re: Anyone watching WMS today? Opinions? Re: [CANSLIM] Re: Anyone watching WMS today? Opinions? Re: [CANSLIM] Krispy Kreme Re: [CANSLIM] IGT [CANSLIM] TSO Re: [CANSLIM] Re: Anyone watching WMS today? Opinions? Re: [CANSLIM] TSO Re: [CANSLIM] HOC Re: [CANSLIM] Camslim[indicator Discussion} Re: [CANSLIM] climax top? RE: [CANSLIM] HOC ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Wed, 30 May 2001 08:35:50 -0700 From: "Ian" Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Re: Anyone watching WMS today? Opinions? I agree with you - I wouldn't buy WMS at $28 - $22 was a much nicer price. But I do like to look out for stocks that are behaving well in a sharp selloff like we are in. They are great candidates for leaders when the selling ends. Are you seeing anything that fits this description? Cheers, Ian - ----- Original Message ----- From: Tim Fisher To: Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2001 8:05 AM Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Re: Anyone watching WMS today? Opinions? > IMHO, it is extended, with a pivot at 24, and the B/O was last week. Too > late for this one, and it also fails my HGS scan. There are much better > stocks in its group. > > At 08:09 AM 5/30/2001 -0700, you wrote: > >During the downdraft of the last week, WMS is easily the strongest acting > >stock that has caught my eye lately. Anyone else have others? > > > >Ian > > > > > >----- Original Message ----- > >From: Ian > >To: > >Sent: Monday, May 14, 2001 8:43 AM > >Subject: Anyone watching WMS today? Opinions? > > > > > > > Thank you, > > > > > > Ian > > > > > > > > >- > >-To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > >-In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > >-"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. > > Tim Fisher > Ore-ROCK-On Rockhounding Web Site > Pacific Fishery Biologists Information > mailto:tim@OreRockOn.com > WWW http://OreRockOn.com > > > - > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 30 May 2001 11:27:44 EDT From: Spencer48@aol.com Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] My Leader's List - ACF comments Tom: I realize this question of what you mean in your economic analysis is not strictly CANSLIM (although some of the components of CANSLIM are composed of economic data that must be analyzed). In any event, could you explain what you mean by the bonds "being heavily amortized on principal by early repayment." I'm not sure I follow, and I'd like to understand your economic analyses of ACF. jans In a message dated 5/30/2001 2:19:20 AM Eastern Daylight Time, stkguru@netside.net writes: << I am already seeing this in the GNMAs and other US govt agency home mortgage backed bonds we buy for our customers. Many purchased just a year or two ago are already being called in full because they have been so heavily amortized on principal by early repayment (presumably due refinancing). >> - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 30 May 2001 11:37:53 -0400 From: "Tom Worley" Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Re: Anyone watching WMS today? Opinions? Looks today to me like a secondary stage b/o. Only time, and the rest of the trading day, will tell for sure. Tom Worley stkguru@netside.net AIM: TexWorley - ----- Original Message ----- From: Tim Fisher To: Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2001 11:05 AM Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Re: Anyone watching WMS today? Opinions? IMHO, it is extended, with a pivot at 24, and the B/O was last week. Too late for this one, and it also fails my HGS scan. There are much better stocks in its group. At 08:09 AM 5/30/2001 -0700, you wrote: >During the downdraft of the last week, WMS is easily the strongest acting >stock that has caught my eye lately. Anyone else have others? > >Ian > > >----- Original Message ----- >From: Ian >To: >Sent: Monday, May 14, 2001 8:43 AM >Subject: Anyone watching WMS today? Opinions? > > > > Thank you, > > > > Ian - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 30 May 2001 11:44:54 -0400 From: "Tom Worley" Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] My Leader's List - ACF comments GNMAs, and other govt agency issues like FNMA and so forth, are pools of home mortgages. When rates drop, especially as sharply as they have this year, home owners with an outstanding mortgage tend to refinance. That leads to a payoff of the principal, thus retiring that loan from the pool. When a pool of, say, $100 million, is reduced to only about $10 or $15 million principal, it is no longer worth maintaining, and is likely to be called in full. What loans still remain in the pool can be rolled into a new pool. Granted, these homeowners have taken out a new loan, which eventually will likely end up in a GNMA pool, but it will be a new pool with a lower coupon, and that will take time (usually about 6 months). Tom Worley stkguru@netside.net AIM: TexWorley - ----- Original Message ----- From: To: Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2001 11:27 AM Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] My Leader's List - ACF comments Tom: I realize this question of what you mean in your economic analysis is not strictly CANSLIM (although some of the components of CANSLIM are composed of economic data that must be analyzed). In any event, could you explain what you mean by the bonds "being heavily amortized on principal by early repayment." I'm not sure I follow, and I'd like to understand your economic analyses of ACF. jans In a message dated 5/30/2001 2:19:20 AM Eastern Daylight Time, stkguru@netside.net writes: << I am already seeing this in the GNMAs and other US govt agency home mortgage backed bonds we buy for our customers. Many purchased just a year or two ago are already being called in full because they have been so heavily amortized on principal by early repayment (presumably due refinancing). >> - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 30 May 2001 11:06:04 -0700 From: "David Squires" Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] climax top? >>I partially disagree, I now believe that highs as old as 18 months ago should be ignored, as per WON. << Point me in this direction...I would like to read this. BTW, it traded 12 million shares in 3 days after it broke the 18 month highs so the market seems to think it matters. That's enough for this little piggy! DSquires - ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tim Fisher" To: Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2001 8:03 AM Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] climax top? > I partially disagree, I now believe that highs as old as 18 months ago > should be ignored, as per WON. Looking at a 12 month chart, it formed a C&H > with a low handle and a deep cup, not ideal, with a pivot at 16 & change, > and is therefore extended for a fresh buy. Second or third stage of the > advance from 8 & change, it's hard to tell which. > > At 08:51 AM 5/30/2001 -0500, you wrote: > >Ann, > > > >I don't see a climax top. If you look at a weekly chart you will see the > >stock has broken out of an 18 month base on massive volume. A pullback is to > >be expected...(long-term bases tend to be tested)but judging from the volume > >the stock should go higher provided M holds up. I looked at your group > >stocks and all, except RLRN seemed to be acting okay to me given the markets > >recent drop. As for M, yesterday and 5-22 were distribution days but you > >often need 4-5 of these to kill an advance. Also, yesterday was still very > >low volume so it is a marginal distribution day. As for leadership, the > >homebuilders and retailers are cracking which is not that surprising. > >However, this was the initial leadership so its important info....Bad. > >Furthermore, I saw a fair amount of distribution in my chart scanning...not > >good. Lastly, I was still able to find a fair number of stocks base building > >and not to many breakdowns...strong positive. It is okay for former > >leadership to fail as long as there are stocks ready to assume the role. I'd > >say the market is at a critical juncture here. If the new base builders > >start falling apart and the recent breakouts start failing I would take 1/2 > >your TTWO off. For now it seems you should hold the whole position. > >Remember, hold the stock that treats you well and dump the one that doesn't. > >I'd say TTWO is treating you well! > > > >DSquires > > > > > >----- Original Message ----- > >From: "Ann Hollingworth" > >To: "CANSLIM Listserv" > >Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2001 6:48 AM > >Subject: [CANSLIM] climax top? > > > > > > > TTWO is up almost 30% since I bought two weeks ago. Volume is way up. WON > > > says not to sell in 1st 8 wks under normal circumstances. But I am worried > > > about market. Also, others in group (RLRN, ATVI, THQI, TUTR) are all down. > > > > > > I am considering selling half at market and keeping the rest. Any > > > suggestions? > > > > > > > > > - > > > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > > > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > > > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. > > > > > >- > >-To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > >-In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > >-"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. > > Tim Fisher > Ore-ROCK-On Rockhounding Web Site > Pacific Fishery Biologists Information > mailto:tim@OreRockOn.com > WWW http://OreRockOn.com > > > - > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 30 May 2001 12:07:19 EDT From: Spencer48@aol.com Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Camslim[indicator Discussion} Canslimmers: I agree with Chris. We all use CANSLIM; however, Tom has said, his buy and sells, using CANSLIM, have been better timed when he uses MACD in conjunction with CANSLIM. This is not a "technical indicator forum"; it is, however, a CANSLIM forum. And if a technical indicator can be used to time the pivot point BO better (or to help decide whether that retracement is weak-so I better sell), what is wrong with discussing technical indicators in a CANSLIM context? I don't see the difference in opinions on where the BO or pivot point is, and opinions on whether or not this-or-that technical indicator helps to pinpoint the BO better. jans In a message dated 5/30/2001 10:28:35 AM Eastern Daylight Time, CHudson@karta.com writes: << Yes Tom, that is my thinking. CANSLIM first to buy, > then TA to ASSIST with the decision to hold/sell. > I think most of us would agree that both used together are helpful. > I did not intend to fragment the group. I can > understand that many would not be interested and do > not want to discuss TA. > Personally I think it is relevant and I'd like to see it discussed on the list. -- Chris H >> - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 30 May 2001 09:43:43 -0700 From: Tim Fisher Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Re: Anyone watching WMS today? Opinions? Right now I'm selling like crazy and holding on to my cash. Whether new leaders emerge or the current leaders continue is irrelevant to me. I have my watch list and will look at it if and when this distribution ends. On 08:35 AM 5/30/01, Ian Said: >I agree with you - I wouldn't buy WMS at $28 - $22 was a much nicer price. >But I do like to look out for stocks that are behaving well in a sharp >selloff like we are in. They are great candidates for leaders when the >selling ends. Are you seeing anything that fits this description? > >Cheers, > >Ian > > >----- Original Message ----- >From: Tim Fisher >To: >Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2001 8:05 AM >Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Re: Anyone watching WMS today? Opinions? > > > > IMHO, it is extended, with a pivot at 24, and the B/O was last week. Too > > late for this one, and it also fails my HGS scan. There are much better > > stocks in its group. > > > > At 08:09 AM 5/30/2001 -0700, you wrote: > > >During the downdraft of the last week, WMS is easily the strongest acting > > >stock that has caught my eye lately. Anyone else have others? > > > > > >Ian > > > > > > > > >----- Original Message ----- > > >From: Ian > > >To: > > >Sent: Monday, May 14, 2001 8:43 AM > > >Subject: Anyone watching WMS today? Opinions? > > > > > > > > > > Thank you, > > > > > > > > Ian > > > > > > > > > > > > >- > > >-To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > > >-In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > > >-"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. > > > > Tim Fisher > > Ore-ROCK-On Rockhounding Web Site > > Pacific Fishery Biologists Information > > mailto:tim@OreRockOn.com > > WWW http://OreRockOn.com > > > > > > - > > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. > > >- >-To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" >-In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or >-"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. Tim Fisher Ore-Rock-On and Pacific Fishery Biologists WWW Sites Tim@OreRockOn.com WWW: http://OreRockOn.com See naked fish and rocks! - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 30 May 2001 10:34:21 -0700 From: "Bill Triffet" Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Re: Anyone watching WMS today? Opinions? I'm in the selling mode also. FEIC & ADVP are gone. Still holding my last one, IGT. - -Bill Triffet - ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tim Fisher" To: Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2001 9:43 AM Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Re: Anyone watching WMS today? Opinions? > Right now I'm selling like crazy and holding on to my cash. Whether new > leaders emerge or the current leaders continue is irrelevant to me. I have > my watch list and will look at it if and when this distribution ends. > > On 08:35 AM 5/30/01, Ian Said: > >I agree with you - I wouldn't buy WMS at $28 - $22 was a much nicer price. > >But I do like to look out for stocks that are behaving well in a sharp > >selloff like we are in. They are great candidates for leaders when the > >selling ends. Are you seeing anything that fits this description? > > > >Cheers, > > > >Ian > > > > > >----- Original Message ----- > >From: Tim Fisher > >To: > >Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2001 8:05 AM > >Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Re: Anyone watching WMS today? Opinions? > > > > > > > IMHO, it is extended, with a pivot at 24, and the B/O was last week. Too > > > late for this one, and it also fails my HGS scan. There are much better > > > stocks in its group. > > > > > > At 08:09 AM 5/30/2001 -0700, you wrote: > > > >During the downdraft of the last week, WMS is easily the strongest acting > > > >stock that has caught my eye lately. Anyone else have others? > > > > > > > >Ian > > > > > > > > > > > >----- Original Message ----- > > > >From: Ian > > > >To: > > > >Sent: Monday, May 14, 2001 8:43 AM > > > >Subject: Anyone watching WMS today? Opinions? > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thank you, > > > > > > > > > > Ian > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >- > > > >-To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > > > >-In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > > > >-"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. > > > > > > Tim Fisher > > > Ore-ROCK-On Rockhounding Web Site > > > Pacific Fishery Biologists Information > > > mailto:tim@OreRockOn.com > > > WWW http://OreRockOn.com > > > > > > > > > - > > > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > > > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > > > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. > > > > > >- > >-To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > >-In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > >-"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. > > Tim Fisher > Ore-Rock-On and Pacific Fishery Biologists WWW Sites > > Tim@OreRockOn.com > WWW: http://OreRockOn.com > See naked fish and rocks! > > > - > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 30 May 2001 15:44:53 -0400 From: "Steven Limbert" Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Krispy Kreme Gene, The only way to eat a KK donut is hot off the assembly line, in the store. They sell them by the dozen in pizza boxes and you see them pick them off just as they pass through the glazer. To eat one in this manner is a religious experience, once they are cold, it is totally over..... Try it, you will love and see the glorious light of KK donuts SL >From: Gene Ricci >Reply-To: canslim@lists.xmission.com >To: canslim@lists.xmission.com >Subject: [CANSLIM] Krispy Kreme >Date: Fri, 25 May 2001 13:16:53 -0500 > >I just tasted my first KK doughnut! The hype was a lot better than the >taste. There is a Super Target store with a KK kiosk (doughnuts baked >elsewhere).... bought the doughnuts around 9.30 a.m. and the glaze on the >dougnuts was sticky, almost wet....... the jelly and creamed filled >doughnuts were very short on filling..... compared to Dunkin Doughnuts or >Souther Maid....... where's the beef? Appears that the best thing about KK >is their stock price. > >From one that never has tasted a bad doughnut. _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 30 May 2001 13:42:26 -0600 From: DougC Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] IGT Still 15 minutes till the market closes so I hope I'm not speaking too soon but IGT does look like it's holding up pretty good today also. IGT is my biggest holding right now even after taking some partial profits. I agree that if the market is done with the pullback after today then IGT might move up some more. If it stays in the 60 to 65 range over the next few weeks that'll be fine with me. If it starts to come down more I won't totally bail until it gets below 56. Given the current uncertain market conditions (could be the end of a bear market rally??) I'm not going to add anymore. Had some Jul 55 and 60 calls to give my returns a little extra kick. Cashed them out on the way down from the peak. Might get back into the Jul60calls and also some Jul65 if some strong buying in IGT starts again this week. At 10:02 PM 5/29/01 -0600, you wrote: >Looks like it closed down 19 cents. On a day where the nasdsaq >lost 3.4%, I think IGT is showing some strength. If anything, if the >market gets back on its feet again, might be good to add to any >position in IGT. > >On 29 May 01, at 10:52, Dave Cameron wrote: > > > Doug or anyone: > > > > As a follow-up to our discussion on IGT, I see its behaving like the > > general market so far today. At what price point do you consider > > that IGT broke out of its handle? At what point (if today's action > > continued) would you bail? > > > > Dave > > > > > > ===== > > Dave Cameron > > dfcameron@yahoo.com > > > > __________________________________________________ > > Do You Yahoo!? > > Yahoo! Auctions - buy the things you want at great prices > > http://auctions.yahoo.com/ > > > > - > > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. > > > >- >-To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" >-In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or >-"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 30 May 2001 15:54:30 EDT From: Vanchee1@aol.com Subject: [CANSLIM] TSO - --part1_7e.15b655af.2846a9f6_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit TSO 79/91 ABA nice C&H with 6 week base at pivot BO yesterday on good volume. Not much of a move as yet, might be ready to go? Thoughts. Numbers look good but not consistent. Chris. - --part1_7e.15b655af.2846a9f6_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit TSO 79/91 ABA nice C&H with 6 week base at pivot BO yesterday on good volume.
 Not much of a move as yet, might be ready to go? Thoughts. Numbers look good
but not consistent.

Chris. - --part1_7e.15b655af.2846a9f6_boundary-- - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 30 May 2001 16:07:50 EDT From: Vanchee1@aol.com Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Re: Anyone watching WMS today? Opinions? - --part1_8b.757fbe9.2846ad16_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Take a look at HOC Chris - --part1_8b.757fbe9.2846ad16_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Take a look at HOC

Chris - --part1_8b.757fbe9.2846ad16_boundary-- - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 30 May 2001 16:04:21 -0400 From: "Tom Worley" Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] TSO This is a multi-part message in MIME format. - ------=_NextPart_000_00CC_01C0E922.308D4B60 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Pretty confused chart pattern where the handle should have formed. Gap = down, gap up, gap down, all in a two week period. With an earnings = forecast for this year of only 10%, there are far too many other oil = related stocks that look much better. Tom Worley stkguru@netside.net AIM: TexWorley ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Vanchee1@aol.com=20 To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20 Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2001 3:54 PM Subject: [CANSLIM] TSO TSO 79/91 ABA nice C&H with 6 week base at pivot BO yesterday on good = volume.=20 Not much of a move as yet, might be ready to go? Thoughts. Numbers = look good=20 but not consistent.=20 Chris.=20 - ------=_NextPart_000_00CC_01C0E922.308D4B60 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Pretty confused chart pattern where the handle = should have=20 formed. Gap down, gap up, gap down, all in a two week period. With an = earnings=20 forecast for this year of only 10%, there are far too many other oil = related=20 stocks that look much better.
 
Tom Worley
stkguru@netside.net
AIM:=20 TexWorley
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Vanchee1@aol.com=20
To: canslim@lists.xmission.com =
Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2001 = 3:54=20 PM
Subject: [CANSLIM] TSO

TSO 79/91 = ABA nice=20 C&H with 6 week base at pivot BO yesterday on good volume. =
 Not=20 much of a move as yet, might be ready to go? Thoughts. Numbers look = good=20
but not consistent.

Chris. = - ------=_NextPart_000_00CC_01C0E922.308D4B60-- - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 30 May 2001 13:22:58 -0700 From: Tim Fisher Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] HOC Hey finally a name I recognize. Good enough numbers for me 93/99/93/B/A/?. Nice B/O today, 4th stage though, I would not buy even if M was favorable. On 01:07 PM 5/30/01, Vanchee1@aol.com Said: >Take a look at HOC > >Chris Tim Fisher Ore-Rock-On and Pacific Fishery Biologists WWW Sites Tim@OreRockOn.com WWW: http://OreRockOn.com See naked fish and rocks! - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 30 May 2001 13:21:36 -0700 (PDT) From: Kent Norman Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Camslim[indicator Discussion} Fine by me Kent Norman - --- Bill Triffet wrote: > Tom & Kent, > > I think if it's discussed as," I see XYZ rated at 90 > 90 A A A breaking out > of a solid base and btw, the MACD is trending..." It > will not be too much to > digest. Deeper discussions should maybe have a TA in > the message line. Easy > enough to bypass for those wishing that. > > -Bill Triffet > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Tom Worley" > To: > Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2001 7:35 AM > Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Camslim[indicator Discussion} > > > > I don't think this will fragment the group, Kent. > I have already > > set filters so the different messages go to > different folders > > depending on the To: line. > > > > I suspect the more advanced CANSLIMers are looking > for new ways > > to improve their skills, just as I am. And in this > turbulent "M", > > even the novices want to make the best decisions. > I don't see > > where TA can hurt anyone interested in learning. > > > > Tom Worley > > stkguru@netside.net > > AIM: TexWorley > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: Kent Norman > > To: > > Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2001 10:22 AM > > Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Camslim[indicator > Discussion} > > > > > > Yes Tom, that is my thinking. CANSLIM first to > buy, > > then TA to ASSIST with the decision to hold/sell. > > > > I did not intend to fragment the group. I can > > understand that many would not be interested and > do > > not want to discuss TA. > > > > I will continue to use this group as primary and > only > > use the TI group for the occasional TA issues. > After > > all, I look at far more stock for purchase than > sell. > > With the use of trailing stops, many sell > decisions > > are made for me. > > > > Regards > > Kent Norman > > > > --- Tom Worley wrote: > > > Actually, Bill, I would object if this forum > turned > > > into a > > > discussion on using technical indicators as a > means > > > of > > > "selecting" stocks as that's what CANSLIM is > for. > > > But when time > > > permits me to practice my full discipline, I do > very > > > much use TI > > > for timing of buys and sells, and resolving > > > decisions on whether > > > to hold. > > > > > > I have always had trouble with timing, either I > am > > > too impulsive > > > and rush in, or I hesitate and wait for that > > > "perfect" point. TI > > > (or TA, Technical Analysis) has served me well > in > > > that regard, > > > giving me an objective yardstick and helping me > > > minimize the > > > "emotion" factor. > > > > > > But the stock under consideration first and > foremost > > > is evaluated > > > according to CANSLIM. > > > > > > Tom Worley > > > stkguru@netside.net > > > AIM: TexWorley > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: Bill Triffet > > > To: > > > Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2001 1:29 AM > > > Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Camslim[indicator > Discussion} > > > > > > > > > I think it's fair to say it's a hot topic. > Actually, > > > it was I > > > that started > > > up the topic of indicators as being non-canslim. > I > > > had only > > > thought it was > > > important to note that for the newcommers, MACD > is > > > not a WON > > > topic. I also > > > now see by the replys of the regulars here, > using > > > this and other > > > indicators > > > is a very important part of stock selection. > Perhaps > > > it's due to > > > the > > > availability of these tools on the net now - > > > somthing that only > > > the > > > privaliged had back when HTMMIS was first > published. > > > So, if you > > > ask my > > > opinion...lets include it! > > > > > > -Bill Triffet > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "esetser" > > > To: > > > Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2001 6:54 PM > > > Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] Camslim[indicator > Discussion} > > > > > > > > > > Maybe it's time to ask this differently. Who > > > objects to these > > > discussions > > > > being held in the group? I don't see them a > > > definitively OT > > > unless the > > > > overall volume gets really large. > > > > > > > > > > > > - > > > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email > > > "majordomo@xmission.com" > > > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > > > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in > your > > > email. > > > > > > > > > > > > - > > > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email > > > "majordomo@xmission.com" > > > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > > > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in > your > > email. > > > > > > __________________________________________________ > > Do You Yahoo!? > > Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail > - only $35 > > a year! http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ > > > > - > > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email > "majordomo@xmission.com" > > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your > email. > > > > > > > > - > > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email > "majordomo@xmission.com" > > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your > email. > === message truncated === __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail - only $35 a year! http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 30 May 2001 16:22:50 -0400 From: "Ann Hollingworth" Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] climax top? IBD(investors.com) is the one who classified them together!! OOookay! - ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tim Fisher" To: Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2001 10:45 AM Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] climax top? > Sorry, ATVI and and THQI are game developers (leisure - games), not > providers of educational software & services (comps-edu). Anyone who groups > them with RLRN has them severely misclassified, IMHO. And they are resting > after making new highs the past week. They are two of my strongest > holdings. Down? Only in the extremely short term. These are two of the > strongest stocks in the CANSLIM universe right now, along the other gamers, > i.e. ALLY, IGT, etc. > > .At 07:48 AM 5/30/2001 -0400, you wrote: > >TTWO is up almost 30% since I bought two weeks ago. Volume is way up. WON > >says not to sell in 1st 8 wks under normal circumstances. But I am worried > >about market. Also, others in group (RLRN, ATVI, THQI, TUTR) are all down. > > > >I am considering selling half at market and keeping the rest. Any > >suggestions? > > > > > >- > >-To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > >-In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > >-"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. > > Tim Fisher > Ore-ROCK-On Rockhounding Web Site > Pacific Fishery Biologists Information > mailto:tim@OreRockOn.com > WWW http://OreRockOn.com > > > - > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. > - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 30 May 2001 13:28:19 -0700 From: "DiFabio, Nancy" Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] HOC This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. - ------_=_NextPart_001_01C0E946.AA474E5A Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit A brief lesson on counting, recognizing stages, please. I find HTMMIS vague on that topic. Grazie. Nancy. - -----Original Message----- From: Tim Fisher [mailto:Tim@OreRockOn.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2001 1:23 PM To: canslim@lists.xmission.com Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] HOC Hey finally a name I recognize. Good enough numbers for me 93/99/93/B/A/?. Nice B/O today, 4th stage though, I would not buy even if M was favorable. On 01:07 PM 5/30/01, Vanchee1@aol.com Said: >Take a look at HOC > >Chris Tim Fisher Ore-Rock-On and Pacific Fishery Biologists WWW Sites Tim@OreRockOn.com WWW: http://OreRockOn.com See naked fish and rocks! - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. "WorldSecure " made the following annotations on 05/30/01 13:26:45 - ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ PLEASE NOTE: This message, including any attachments, may include privileged, confidential and/or inside information. Any distribution or use of this communication by anyone other than the intended recipient(s) is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender by replying to this message and then delete it from your system. Thank you. ============================================================================== - ------_=_NextPart_001_01C0E946.AA474E5A Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit RE: [CANSLIM] HOC

A brief lesson on counting, recognizing stages, please.
I find HTMMIS vague on that topic.
Grazie.
Nancy.

-----Original Message-----
From: Tim Fisher [mailto:Tim@OreRockOn.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2001 1:23 PM
To: canslim@lists.xmission.com
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] HOC


Hey finally a name I recognize. Good enough numbers for me 93/99/93/B/A/?.
Nice B/O today, 4th stage though, I would not buy even if M was favorable.

On 01:07 PM 5/30/01, Vanchee1@aol.com Said:
>Take a look at HOC
>
>Chris


Tim Fisher
Ore-Rock-On and Pacific Fishery Biologists WWW Sites

Tim@OreRockOn.com
WWW: http://OreRockOn.com
See naked fish and rocks!


-
-To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
-In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
-"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.

"WorldSecure <irell.com>" made the following
annotations on 05/30/01 13:26:45
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PLEASE NOTE: This message, including any attachments, may include privileged, confidential and/or inside information. Any distribution or use of this communication by anyone other than the intended recipient(s) is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender by replying to this message and then delete it from your system. Thank you.


==============================================================================

- ------_=_NextPart_001_01C0E946.AA474E5A-- - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ End of canslim-digest V2 #1419 ****************************** To unsubscribe to canslim-digest, send an email to "majordomo@xmission.com" with "unsubscribe canslim-digest" in the body of the message. For information on digests or retrieving files and old messages send "help" to the same address. Do not use quotes in your message.