From: owner-canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com (canslim-digest) To: canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com Subject: canslim-digest V2 #1437 Reply-To: canslim Sender: owner-canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com Errors-To: owner-canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com Precedence: bulk Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-No-Archive: yes canslim-digest Tuesday, June 5 2001 Volume 02 : Number 1437 In this issue: Re: [CANSLIM] BRL-an example of an faulty base? Re: [CANSLIM] MSS RE: [CANSLIM] BRL-an example of an faulty base? Re: [CANSLIM] BRL-an example of an faulty base? Re: [CANSLIM] BEIQ anyone? RE: [CANSLIM] BEIQ anyone? Re: [CANSLIM] mss-deal [CANSLIM] FITB [CANSLIM] re FITB Re: [CANSLIM] FITB RE: [CANSLIM] mss-deal [CANSLIM] UNT Re: [CANSLIM] CANSLIM Alert email service [CANSLIM] DYII [CANSLIM] SGR RE: [CANSLIM] BEIQ anyone? Re: [CANSLIM] DYII Re: [CANSLIM] SGR Re: [CANSLIM] ENTG Re: [CANSLIM] ENTG ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2001 12:43:18 -0400 From: "Tom Worley" Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] BRL-an example of an faulty base? Hi Doug, It's just my interpretation of WON's teachings and what I was taught, but I treat the c&h formation as in four parts: left rim to bottom, bottom, bottom to right rim, handle. When I look at up days/volume vs down days/volume, I look at each segment differently. I expect the left side to have more down days, likewise the bottom. Towards the end of the bottom, I expect the down days to become less significant (e.g. less volume than on up days). On the right side, I expect more up days. Once in the handle, I tend to expect a mixture of up and down days, but am biased more towards those handles that are mostly minor up days and maintain a tight price range. I don't try to add up all the down days vs up days for the entire formation. Tom Worley stkguru@netside.net AIM: TexWorley - ----- Original Message ----- From: Doug Shannon To: Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2001 12:23 PM Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] BRL-an example of an faulty base? Maybe you guys can set me straight. Here was my thinking. I viewed the price action from 2/5 on as a cup formation which as of yet has not formed a handle. The price action is relatively tight. 3/22 was a down day on higher volume but the close was near the high, a good sign. Volume picks up on the right side of the base, another good sign. RS is at a new high. However, I remember WON saying that you want at least as many up days or weeks (depending upon which chart you are analyzing) on higher volume as you have down days or weeks on higher volume. Counting each down day on higher volume since 2/5 I get 24. Counting each up day on higher volume I get 20. Looking at the weekly charts there are 7 down weeks on higher vol. and 3 up weeks on higher volume. Therefore, since there seems to be more distribution than accumulation you have a faulty base even though it has a fairly nice tight shape to it. For this exercise I am ignoring the fact that the 50 MA is below the 200 MA and earnings and sales over the last 4 quarters have been only 19%,15%,6%,14% far below its growth rate of 54%. Although, it does have a great earnings est. of 139% for '02. Please let me know where I am going wrong in my analysis or interpretation of WON's statements. Thanks, Doug - -----Original Message----- From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of Tom Worley Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2001 10:44 AM To: canslim@lists.xmission.com Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] BRL-an example of an faulty base? Doug, Not sure how you are defining "base". My best guess is that you are looking at the cup that started 1st week of Feb, and is just now reaching what will hopefully become the right rim, even with the left. Otherwise, the stock is pure momentum. I see the fall from grace (left side of the cup) well marked by heavy selling and price declines. I also see heavy volume periodically in the bottom of the cup, but with the price remaining stable, suggesting institutional support at that level. I see light volume, but consistently more up days than down, on the right side of the cup. And most of the down day's volume was less than the up days. I presume the stock declined so much because of the 1% earnings growth forecasted for this year (ending June). I also presume recovery has been aided by strong group action (Medical - Generic Drugs, GRS 88) as well as the forecast of earnings growth of 139% for next year (starting in 3 weeks). So, guess I can't answer the question, because I don't see a "faulty base". Tom Worley stkguru@netside.net AIM: TexWorley - ----- Original Message ----- From: Doug Shannon To: Canslim@Lists. Xmission. Com Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2001 10:31 AM Subject: [CANSLIM] BRL-an example of an faulty base? Would BRL be an example of a faulty base because is contains more down days and weeks on higher volume than up days and weeks on higher volume? Thanks, Doug - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2001 13:27:01 -0400 From: asosis@ca.ibm.com Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] MSS I saw it. Looks good. Thank you. Anna "David Squires" @lists.xmission.com on 06/05/2001 12:25:29 PM Please respond to canslim@lists.xmission.com Sent by: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com To: cc: Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] MSS Anna, I pay for this info. from Quote.com. I don't know a free place for this info. Here's a picture of it. I filtered it to 2200 shares or higher. Green is good, red and purple are bad. (wait 15 minutes for it to show up). ftp://ftp.xmission.com/pub/users/m/mcjathan/canslim/MSS.gif Dave - ----- Original Message ----- From: To: Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2001 11:02 AM Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] MSS > David, > > were do you get information for Time and Sales? > > I've tried to use the one at freerealtime.com, but it is very inconvinient > and I had only seen a couple of 15,000 trades on Ask. > > Does anyone know a better place to look up Time&Sales? > Thank you. > > Anna > > > "David Squires" @lists.xmission.com on 06/05/2001 > 11:44:41 AM > > Please respond to canslim@lists.xmission.com > > Sent by: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com > > > To: > cc: > Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] MSS > > > > Funds only own, according to DGO, 14% of the 6.8 million share > > float. So I doubt funds are dumping. > > Why does % owned by funds have anything to do with their buy and sell > decisions following a fundamental event? Time & Sales shows plenty of block > trades today. > > > And yes, the ADV does make it vulnerable to such a steep selloff, > > just as it makes it benefit from heavy buy side volume > > The only problem with this is stocks go down a whole lot faster than they > go > up. That's why thin stocks are so risky, especially if they have high > expectations already built in. > > DSquires > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Tom Worley" > To: > Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2001 10:25 AM > Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] MSS > > > > Funds only own, according to DGO, 14% of the 6.8 million share > > float. So I doubt funds are dumping. > > > > I have not followed the stock in many months, but with earnings > > reported yesterday, I would review carefully what the company > > said about the short term future. Check the SEC site as well as > > reading the news release. If they did a conference call, see if > > it's still available on line. > > > > And yes, the ADV does make it vulnerable to such a steep selloff, > > just as it makes it benefit from heavy buy side volume. But it > > still usually takes news of some kind, or an event like a > > wirehouse downgrading it, to do this kind of damage. It had > > already moved up 67% from its most recent low, so there could be > > some profit taking (sell on news), but that would not account for > > the volume since it had been basing for several weeks. > > > > Tom Worley > > stkguru@netside.net > > AIM: TexWorley > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: Ralli Katsikas > > To: > > Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2001 11:11 AM > > Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] MSS > > > > > > Don't forget that it's ADV is only 31,300 which makes it easy to > > be affected > > by selling. > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: > > To: > > Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2001 9:49 AM > > Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] MSS > > > > > > > Tom: > > > > > > Can you find any news on MSS. All I see on Yahoo, and AOL > > is that > > MSS > > > reported yesterday that it had a very good quarter regarding > > sales and > > > earnings. Why would it fall 5 points on high volume? It looks > > like the > > > institutions are abandoning ship, but I have no idea why. Do > > you? > > > > > > jans > > > > > > > > > > > > In a message dated 6/5/2001 10:36:18 AM Eastern Daylight Time, > > > RickParsons@Columbus.rr.com writes: > > > > > > << MSS which I had on my watch list has dropped from 25 to 20 > > suddenly. > > My > > > Esignal software does not show any negative news on this > > stock. Does > > > anyone else see anything that would cause this drop? I am > > wondering just > > > how good my Esignal news service is. > > > > > > Rick >> > > > > > > > > - > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. > - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2001 13:46:09 -0400 From: "Doug Shannon" Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] BRL-an example of an faulty base? Thanks Tom. Could you give me a couple of examples of stocks that have faulty bases? Thanks, Doug - -----Original Message----- From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of Tom Worley Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2001 12:43 PM To: canslim@lists.xmission.com Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] BRL-an example of an faulty base? Hi Doug, It's just my interpretation of WON's teachings and what I was taught, but I treat the c&h formation as in four parts: left rim to bottom, bottom, bottom to right rim, handle. When I look at up days/volume vs down days/volume, I look at each segment differently. I expect the left side to have more down days, likewise the bottom. Towards the end of the bottom, I expect the down days to become less significant (e.g. less volume than on up days). On the right side, I expect more up days. Once in the handle, I tend to expect a mixture of up and down days, but am biased more towards those handles that are mostly minor up days and maintain a tight price range. I don't try to add up all the down days vs up days for the entire formation. Tom Worley stkguru@netside.net AIM: TexWorley - ----- Original Message ----- From: Doug Shannon To: Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2001 12:23 PM Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] BRL-an example of an faulty base? Maybe you guys can set me straight. Here was my thinking. I viewed the price action from 2/5 on as a cup formation which as of yet has not formed a handle. The price action is relatively tight. 3/22 was a down day on higher volume but the close was near the high, a good sign. Volume picks up on the right side of the base, another good sign. RS is at a new high. However, I remember WON saying that you want at least as many up days or weeks (depending upon which chart you are analyzing) on higher volume as you have down days or weeks on higher volume. Counting each down day on higher volume since 2/5 I get 24. Counting each up day on higher volume I get 20. Looking at the weekly charts there are 7 down weeks on higher vol. and 3 up weeks on higher volume. Therefore, since there seems to be more distribution than accumulation you have a faulty base even though it has a fairly nice tight shape to it. For this exercise I am ignoring the fact that the 50 MA is below the 200 MA and earnings and sales over the last 4 quarters have been only 19%,15%,6%,14% far below its growth rate of 54%. Although, it does have a great earnings est. of 139% for '02. Please let me know where I am going wrong in my analysis or interpretation of WON's statements. Thanks, Doug - -----Original Message----- From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of Tom Worley Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2001 10:44 AM To: canslim@lists.xmission.com Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] BRL-an example of an faulty base? Doug, Not sure how you are defining "base". My best guess is that you are looking at the cup that started 1st week of Feb, and is just now reaching what will hopefully become the right rim, even with the left. Otherwise, the stock is pure momentum. I see the fall from grace (left side of the cup) well marked by heavy selling and price declines. I also see heavy volume periodically in the bottom of the cup, but with the price remaining stable, suggesting institutional support at that level. I see light volume, but consistently more up days than down, on the right side of the cup. And most of the down day's volume was less than the up days. I presume the stock declined so much because of the 1% earnings growth forecasted for this year (ending June). I also presume recovery has been aided by strong group action (Medical - Generic Drugs, GRS 88) as well as the forecast of earnings growth of 139% for next year (starting in 3 weeks). So, guess I can't answer the question, because I don't see a "faulty base". Tom Worley stkguru@netside.net AIM: TexWorley - ----- Original Message ----- From: Doug Shannon To: Canslim@Lists. Xmission. Com Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2001 10:31 AM Subject: [CANSLIM] BRL-an example of an faulty base? Would BRL be an example of a faulty base because is contains more down days and weeks on higher volume than up days and weeks on higher volume? Thanks, Doug - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2001 13:11:10 -0500 From: "David Squires" Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] BRL-an example of an faulty base? Doug, Your analysis seems like you are giving BRL an average rating overall. I would agree. It has some good points and a few bad points. I would also agree with most of Tom's comments. I'm not sure the up/down volume counting is such a great idea but maybe a good general measurement. I have never done it but will look at it in the future. Lastly, this whole group moved recently and that is a sign of a serious buying on the tape. Chart: ftp://ftp.xmission.com/pub/users/m/mcjathan/canslim/brl.gif (wait 15 minutes) Dave - ----- Original Message ----- From: "Doug Shannon" To: Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2001 11:23 AM Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] BRL-an example of an faulty base? > Maybe you guys can set me straight. Here was my thinking. > > I viewed the price action from 2/5 on as a cup formation which as of yet has > not formed a handle. The price action is relatively tight. 3/22 was a > down day on higher volume but the close was near the high, a good sign. > Volume picks up on the right side of the base, another good sign. RS is at a > new high. However, > > I remember WON saying that you want at least as many up days or weeks > (depending upon which chart you are analyzing) on higher volume as you have > down days or weeks on higher volume. > > Counting each down day on higher volume since 2/5 I get 24. Counting each > up day on higher volume I get 20. Looking at the weekly charts there are 7 > down weeks on higher vol. and 3 up weeks on higher volume. > > Therefore, since there seems to be more distribution than accumulation you > have a faulty base even though it has a fairly nice tight shape to it. > > For this exercise I am ignoring the fact that the 50 MA is below the 200 MA > and earnings and sales over the last 4 quarters have been only > 19%,15%,6%,14% far below its growth rate of 54%. Although, it does have a > great earnings est. of 139% for '02. > > Please let me know where I am going wrong in my analysis or interpretation > of WON's statements. > > Thanks, > > Doug > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com > [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of Tom Worley > Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2001 10:44 AM > To: canslim@lists.xmission.com > Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] BRL-an example of an faulty base? > > > Doug, > > Not sure how you are defining "base". My best guess is that you > are looking at the cup that started 1st week of Feb, and is just > now reaching what will hopefully become the right rim, even with > the left. Otherwise, the stock is pure momentum. > > I see the fall from grace (left side of the cup) well marked by > heavy selling and price declines. I also see heavy volume > periodically in the bottom of the cup, but with the price > remaining stable, suggesting institutional support at that level. > I see light volume, but consistently more up days than down, on > the right side of the cup. And most of the down day's volume was > less than the up days. > > I presume the stock declined so much because of the 1% earnings > growth forecasted for this year (ending June). I also presume > recovery has been aided by strong group action (Medical - Generic > Drugs, GRS 88) as well as the forecast of earnings growth of 139% > for next year (starting in 3 weeks). > > So, guess I can't answer the question, because I don't see a > "faulty base". > > Tom Worley > stkguru@netside.net > AIM: TexWorley > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Doug Shannon > To: Canslim@Lists. Xmission. Com > Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2001 10:31 AM > Subject: [CANSLIM] BRL-an example of an faulty base? > > > Would BRL be an example of a faulty base because is contains more > down days > and weeks on higher volume than up days and weeks on higher > volume? > > Thanks, > > Doug > > > > - > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. > > > - > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2001 14:39:58 -0400 From: asosis@ca.ibm.com Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] BEIQ anyone? It is breaking out as we speak. I like the chart. Anna - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2001 15:05:07 -0400 From: "Dave" Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] BEIQ anyone? Looks to me like the breakout was 5/21 on moderate volume, after a less-than-perfect handle (flat, increasing volume). I guess you can also call today a breakout of a high handle with the pivot at 32.11, but it's also not such a great handle. Nevertheless, except for group strength, ratings are excellent and the stock is at new highs, so it may go. It's a little volatile for my tastes. > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com > [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of asosis@ca.ibm.com > Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2001 2:40 PM > To: canslim@lists.xmission.com > Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] BEIQ anyone? > > > It is breaking out as we speak. I like the chart. > > Anna > > > - > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. > - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2001 15:18:24 EDT From: BIKEAR@aol.com Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] mss-deal - --part1_2d.ca538f2.284e8a80_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit what is the deal with mss and would if be too crazy to buy into this stock...everything looks good - --part1_2d.ca538f2.284e8a80_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit what is the deal with mss and would if be too crazy to buy into this
stock...everything looks good - --part1_2d.ca538f2.284e8a80_boundary-- - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2001 12:21:26 -0700 From: "Nicholas Barone" Subject: [CANSLIM] FITB Hi: Just new to the group. Looking at FITB seems like the chart has an upward slanting handle on it's cup -- which, I believe, is not good - am I reading this correctly? It is a solid slow growth company. Group = 130 It is not highly rated RS =73 but it is first in the group!! Won't financials do better in this environment? comments?? _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2001 15:21:48 -0400 From: Hotmail Subject: [CANSLIM] re FITB Hi: Just new to the group. Looking at FITB seems like the chart has an upward slanting handle on it's cup -- which, I believe, is not good - am I reading this correctly? It is a solid slow growth company. Group = 130 It is not highly rated RS =73 but it is first in the group!! Won't financials do better in this environment? comments?? - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2001 14:35:43 -0500 From: "David Squires" Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] FITB The handle looks fine to me. A nice flat one...breakout was on 6/1/01. DSquires - ----- Original Message ----- From: "Nicholas Barone" To: Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2001 2:21 PM Subject: [CANSLIM] FITB > Hi: > > Just new to the group. > > Looking at FITB > > seems like the chart has an upward slanting handle on it's cup -- > which, I believe, is not good - am I reading this correctly? > > It is a solid slow growth company. > > Group = 130 > It is not highly rated RS =73 > but it is first in the group!! > > Won't financials do better in this environment? > > comments?? > _________________________________________________________________ > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com > > > - > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2001 16:18:23 -0400 From: "Doug Shannon" Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] mss-deal This is a multi-part message in MIME format. - ------=_NextPart_000_0002_01C0EDDB.248F0F70 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Fundies look good but group RS is only average with a C ranking and the 50 day is still below the 200 day MA. I see it as a double bottom base that couldn't surpass the middle of the W at 27.13. I guess you could also consider it to be a cup w/ handle starting on 1/26 and forming a handle starting 5/11 and broke out on 5/23 only to fail today. Crashing thru the 50 day MA on very fast trade - one of WON's sell rules. I would leave it alone. Doug -----Original Message----- From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of BIKEAR@aol.com Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2001 3:18 PM To: canslim@lists.xmission.com Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] mss-deal what is the deal with mss and would if be too crazy to buy into this stock...everything looks good - ------=_NextPart_000_0002_01C0EDDB.248F0F70 Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Fundies look good but group RS is only average with a C ranking = and the=20 50 day is still below the 200 day MA.  I see it as a double bottom = base=20 that couldn't surpass the middle of the W at 27.13.  I guess you = could also=20 consider it to be a cup w/ handle starting on 1/26 and forming a handle = starting=20 5/11 and broke out on 5/23 only to fail today.  Crashing thru the = 50 day MA=20 on very fast trade - one of WON's sell rules.  I would leave it=20 alone.
 
Doug
-----Original Message-----
From:=20 owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com=20 [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of=20 BIKEAR@aol.com
Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2001 3:18=20 PM
To: canslim@lists.xmission.com
Subject: Re: = [CANSLIM]=20 mss-deal

what is=20 the deal with mss and would if be too crazy to buy into this=20
stock...everything looks good =
- ------=_NextPart_000_0002_01C0EDDB.248F0F70-- - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2001 16:21:42 EDT From: Vanchee1@aol.com Subject: [CANSLIM] UNT - --part1_e6.168732c8.284e9956_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit UNT 78/90 BAB, looks good to me, noted it in today's IBD stocks in the news page A14. Not sure on the chart for this one no real definite formation, but looks like a double bottom. Chris - --part1_e6.168732c8.284e9956_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit UNT 78/90 BAB, looks good to me, noted it in today's IBD stocks in the news
page A14. Not sure on the chart for this one no real definite formation, but
looks like a double bottom.

Chris - --part1_e6.168732c8.284e9956_boundary-- - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2001 13:46:54 -0700 From: Joe Maguire Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] CANSLIM Alert email service David , I would be interested in trying our service ,Yes.. put me down for it [would you please let me know if you get this E.mail .. not sure if I'm getting out .. best in profits Thx, Joe Maguire San Diego David Squires wrote: > Hi all, > > Not long ago a member asked if there was a service that provided Cup & > Handle setups. The response seemed to be that there were many CANSLIM data > services, but no service that provided actual setups. I have thought about > this since then and have decided to start such a service. > > Here's what I propose: > > The CANSLIM ALERT > > The service will come out on a weekly basis as an email every Sunday and > provide 5 things: > > 1) The top 50(if there are 50) CANSLIM setups as I see them (using strict > CANSLIM criteria). (100,000 50-day ADV minimum) > 2) The top 25 bases that do not meet CANSLIM criteria for some reason, but > are setting up for a breakout. > 3) The top 25 stocks under strong accumulation, but not in a base. These > stocks will be for the more aggressive traders that are more swing trading > oriented. These stocks will be at, or near, a trading opportunity. This will > be the only group that won't have buy points. > > All the above stocks will include the following data each week: > > Over grade from me (1-99) > Chart grade from me(1-99) > Symbol > Name > Group > Group Strength > Acc/Dis > EPS Rank > 3,6, and 12-month Relative Strength > Earnings Revision Momentum, > Earnings Drift, > Current Quarter's EPS Growth Estimate > Next Quarter's EPS Growth Estimate > Current Year's EPS Growth Estimate > Next Year's EPS Growth Estimate > Buy Point > Stop loss > 50-day ADV(average daily volume) > 1.5x50-day ADV and hourly volume extrapolations. > > 4) A Stock of the Week - this will be a stock that I feel has excellent > chances of performing well in the week and weeks to come. > 5) Commentary on intermediate-term market direction as popularized by > William O'Neil. > > The cost will be $12.50 per month. > > IF YOU ARE INTERESTED PLEASE EMAIL ME PRIVATELY AND SAY SO. PLEASE DO NOT > CLUTTER THE LISTSERV WITH QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS EMAIL. > MAIL TO: dcsquires1@home.com > > For those that feel this is inappropriate advertising, don't worry, I am > only going to post this once. > > Good Trading, > > Dave Squires > > - > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2001 16:33:49 -0500 From: psych360@yahoo.com Subject: [CANSLIM] DYII Just broke out of a 7 week base around 7X normal volume....it closed about 5% past old 52-wk. high at 21 The volume today was nearly double any single day vol. it's had in the last year. Any thoughts? Too extended to consider? Actually, I'm guessing this one may open higher in the AM. 77 99 A A B 3 Yr. EPS 158% Latest Q up 62% ROE 27% Mgmt owns about 70% - Float is only 4.3M Group Rank is 11 _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2001 17:51:04 -0400 From: "Doug Shannon" Subject: [CANSLIM] SGR Any thoughts on SGR. It looks like its forming a handle which is part of a 7 week base starting on 4/25. Found support at 50 day. Tight price action, but a V bottom. Volume has dried up nicely. Fundies are pretty good as well. 94 95 A B B 44%,26% EST. for '01 and '02 last 4 EPS: 5%, 25%, 41%, 27% last 4 sales: 40%,89%,178%,97% good institutional sponsorship MGMT owns 28% but ROE only 11% U/D vol. = .9 Thanks, Doug Doug Shannon dshannon@austin.rr.com 512.331.1940 (voice) 512.331.4684 (fax) - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2001 15:18:27 -0700 (PDT) From: Dave Cameron Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] BEIQ anyone? Anna, I like BEIQ also. Its not a perfect chart, but given the rankings - its close enough. In order to make this call, I looked at the 2-yr weekly chart as well as a shorter-term daily chart. Good luck,,Dave ===== Dave Cameron dfcameron@yahoo.com __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail - only $35 a year! http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2001 18:29:53 -0400 From: "Tom Worley" Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] DYII If you view the last eight weeks as a flat double bottom, then today's move makes it too extended. On the other hand, if you simply view it as a base below the high of 4/16, then today's close puts it exactly 5% over the pivot after a 23% gain. ROE very strong at 51%, they have completed and reported two qtrs, and on track for the forecast of 0.69 (+68%). Next year's forecast is an additional 29%. DGO indicates that, based on last year, they won't report Q3 (ended 5/31) until 7/17. GRS also strong at 94. Tom Worley stkguru@netside.net AIM: TexWorley - ----- Original Message ----- From: To: Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2001 5:33 PM Subject: [CANSLIM] DYII Just broke out of a 7 week base around 7X normal volume....it closed about 5% past old 52-wk. high at 21 The volume today was nearly double any single day vol. it's had in the last year. Any thoughts? Too extended to consider? Actually, I'm guessing this one may open higher in the AM. 77 99 A A B 3 Yr. EPS 158% Latest Q up 62% ROE 27% Mgmt owns about 70% - Float is only 4.3M Group Rank is 11 _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2001 18:41:53 -0400 From: "Tom Worley" Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] SGR Doug, What immediately caught my eye on the DGO chart was the sheer smoothness of both the 50 and 200 DMA. My first thought, not changed after looking more closely, was to treat this as a LLUR despite the substantial volatility it has shown. Done that way, a dip to or below the 50 DMA would be the entry, however the volatility of this stock, and several trips below the 50, make it a much greater risk than a normal LLUR. I also note on the fundies side that, after 2 qtrs, they are well behind the full year forecast. I also note that there has been major increases in sales over the past 4 qtrs without the earnings growing comparatively. Possibly there has been a secondary, or split, accounting for this. But your percentage figures cited below show the same thing. I also note funds own 46% of the float of 29.1 million shares. Tom Worley stkguru@netside.net AIM: TexWorley - ----- Original Message ----- From: Doug Shannon To: Canslim@Lists. Xmission. Com Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2001 5:51 PM Subject: [CANSLIM] SGR Any thoughts on SGR. It looks like its forming a handle which is part of a 7 week base starting on 4/25. Found support at 50 day. Tight price action, but a V bottom. Volume has dried up nicely. Fundies are pretty good as well. 94 95 A B B 44%,26% EST. for '01 and '02 last 4 EPS: 5%, 25%, 41%, 27% last 4 sales: 40%,89%,178%,97% good institutional sponsorship MGMT owns 28% but ROE only 11% U/D vol. = .9 Thanks, Doug Doug Shannon dshannon@austin.rr.com 512.331.1940 (voice) 512.331.4684 (fax) - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2001 18:57:12 EDT From: BIKEAR@aol.com Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] ENTG - --part1_c3.1193675f.284ebdc8_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit thoughts? - --part1_c3.1193675f.284ebdc8_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit thoughts? - --part1_c3.1193675f.284ebdc8_boundary-- - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2001 19:05:13 -0400 From: "Tom Worley" Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] ENTG This is a multi-part message in MIME format. - ------=_NextPart_000_0048_01C0EDF2.73676B80 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Yes, but I would like to hear your thoughts first, then I'll comment. Tom Worley stkguru@netside.net AIM: TexWorley ----- Original Message -----=20 From: BIKEAR@aol.com=20 To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20 Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2001 6:57 PM Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] ENTG thoughts?=20 - ------=_NextPart_000_0048_01C0EDF2.73676B80 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Yes, but I would like to hear your thoughts first, = then I'll=20 comment.
 
Tom Worley
stkguru@netside.net
AIM:=20 TexWorley
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 BIKEAR@aol.com
To: canslim@lists.xmission.com =
Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2001 = 6:57=20 PM
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] = ENTG

thoughts?=20 - ------=_NextPart_000_0048_01C0EDF2.73676B80-- - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ End of canslim-digest V2 #1437 ****************************** To unsubscribe to canslim-digest, send an email to "majordomo@xmission.com" with "unsubscribe canslim-digest" in the body of the message. For information on digests or retrieving files and old messages send "help" to the same address. Do not use quotes in your message.