From: owner-canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com (canslim-digest) To: canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com Subject: canslim-digest V2 #1787 Reply-To: canslim Sender: owner-canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com Errors-To: owner-canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com Precedence: bulk Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-No-Archive: yes canslim-digest Wednesday, November 7 2001 Volume 02 : Number 1787 In this issue: [CANSLIM] Secondary's RE: [CANSLIM] PECS Re: [CANSLIM] PECS Re: [CANSLIM] SDIX [CANSLIM] Index charts and "M" Re: [CANSLIM] Secondary's Re: [CANSLIM] PECS Re: [CANSLIM] SDIX Re: [CANSLIM] PECS Re: [CANSLIM] Secondary's [CANSLIM] TARO Re: [CANSLIM] TARO RE: [CANSLIM] Microsoft Investor Website RE: [CANSLIM] TARO Re: [CANSLIM] TARO ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2001 21:35:59 -0700 From: esetser Subject: [CANSLIM] Secondary's Hey, what is it with all the secondary offerings right now? I noticed 2 of today's post mentioned secondary's. In this latest rally, I purchased 2 stocks, CPRT and BVF. Since that point, both have announced secondary offerings. With CPRT, the stock went very weak and I finally bailed the 3rd time it fell below my -8% point. With BVF, the announcement caused the stock to open about 6% below yesterday's close. Fortunately, support came right in and the stock ended up in the black for the day, so maybe there is hope on this one. Still, what is it about this timeframe that causes everyone to offer more stock? - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2001 22:48:34 -0600 From: "Hill, Ernie" Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] PECS This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. - ------_=_NextPart_001_01C16747.74B4A7E0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" I too have been watching this one, as it fell and ascended again. I have yet to find a point in this chart pattern that I wanted to enter. Today's action is likely to be a precursor to a further decline. E - -----Original Message----- From: Katherine Malm [mailto:kmalm@earthlink.net] Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2001 9:26 PM To: canslim@lists.xmission.com Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] PECS Matt, I've been watching this one as well. Today's action left me scratching my head. The only negatives I had listed on this one were fairly high institutional holding and a fairly big rash of recent insider selling. The unexpected airpockets in stocks like SONC on news that wasn't all that awful makes me think Mr. M is playing a hand. I've put this one on my "wait and see" list and will just let the chart do what it wants to do. Maybe it will become clearer then. Katherine kmalm@earthlink.net - ----- Original Message ----- From: Matt & Alicia Leverette To: canslim@lists.xmission.com Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2001 8:21 PM Subject: [CANSLIM] PECS I would like to hear some of your thoughts on this stock and specifically todays action. It looked as if PECS was completing a smooth cup, but today the price dropped almost 10% on 3 X Average Volume. If volume dries up and a handle is formed would this stock be a buy or would today's action be a cause for concern? Thanks, Matt ****************************************************************** This email and any files transmitted with it from the ElPaso Corporation are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the sender. ****************************************************************** - ------_=_NextPart_001_01C16747.74B4A7E0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1"
I too have been watching this one, as it fell and ascended again. I have yet to find a point in this chart pattern that I wanted to enter. Today's action is likely to be a precursor to a further decline.
 
E
-----Original Message-----
From: Katherine Malm [mailto:kmalm@earthlink.net]
Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2001 9:26 PM
To: canslim@lists.xmission.com
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] PECS

Matt,
 
I've been watching this one as well. Today's action left me scratching my head. The only negatives I had listed on this one were  fairly high institutional holding and a fairly big rash of recent insider selling. The unexpected airpockets in stocks like SONC on news that wasn't all that awful makes me think Mr. M is playing a hand. I've put this one on my "wait and see" list and will just let the chart do what it wants to do. Maybe it will become clearer then.
 
Katherine
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2001 8:21 PM
Subject: [CANSLIM] PECS

I would like to hear some of your thoughts on this stock and specifically todays action.  It looked as if PECS was completing a smooth cup, but today the price dropped almost 10% on 3 X Average Volume.  If volume dries up and a handle is formed would this stock be a buy or would today's action be a cause for concern?
 
Thanks,
 
Matt


******************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it from the ElPaso
Corporation are confidential and intended solely for the
use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
If you have received this email in error please notify the
sender.
******************************************************************
 - ------_=_NextPart_001_01C16747.74B4A7E0-- - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2001 05:36:14 -0600 From: "Katherine Malm" Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] PECS This is a multi-part message in MIME format. - ------=_NextPart_000_0100_01C1674E.1D643120 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I'd agree with you Ernie. Never know what the cause may be. Maybe a big = contract lost to Accenture or CSC, or maybe the market's just voting it = "beyond fair value." Still think is worth keeping on the watch list = given its market sweet spot. Katherine ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Hill, Ernie=20 To: 'canslim@lists.xmission.com'=20 Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2001 10:48 PM Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] PECS I too have been watching this one, as it fell and ascended again. I = have yet to find a point in this chart pattern that I wanted to enter. = Today's action is likely to be a precursor to a further decline. E -----Original Message----- From: Katherine Malm [mailto:kmalm@earthlink.net] Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2001 9:26 PM To: canslim@lists.xmission.com Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] PECS Matt, I've been watching this one as well. Today's action left me = scratching my head. The only negatives I had listed on this one were = fairly high institutional holding and a fairly big rash of recent = insider selling. The unexpected airpockets in stocks like SONC on news = that wasn't all that awful makes me think Mr. M is playing a hand. I've = put this one on my "wait and see" list and will just let the chart do = what it wants to do. Maybe it will become clearer then. Katherine kmalm@earthlink.net ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Matt & Alicia Leverette=20 To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20 Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2001 8:21 PM Subject: [CANSLIM] PECS I would like to hear some of your thoughts on this stock and = specifically todays action. It looked as if PECS was completing a = smooth cup, but today the price dropped almost 10% on 3 X Average = Volume. If volume dries up and a handle is formed would this stock be a = buy or would today's action be a cause for concern? Thanks, Matt ****************************************************************** This email and any files transmitted with it from the ElPaso=20 Corporation are confidential and intended solely for the=20 use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.=20 If you have received this email in error please notify the=20 sender. ****************************************************************** - ------=_NextPart_000_0100_01C1674E.1D643120 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I'd agree with you Ernie. Never know = what the cause=20 may be. Maybe a big contract lost to Accenture or CSC, or maybe the = market's=20 just voting it "beyond fair value." Still think is worth keeping on the = watch=20 list given its market sweet spot.
 
Katherine
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Hill,=20 Ernie
Sent: Tuesday, November 06, = 2001 10:48=20 PM
Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] = PECS

I=20 too have been watching this one, as it fell and ascended again. I have = yet to=20 find a point in this chart pattern that I wanted to enter. Today's = action is=20 likely to be a precursor to a further decline.
 
E
-----Original Message-----
From: Katherine Malm=20 [mailto:kmalm@earthlink.net]
Sent: Tuesday, November 06, = 2001 9:26=20 PM
To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=
Subject:=20 Re: [CANSLIM] PECS

Matt,
 
I've been watching this one as = well. Today's=20 action left me scratching my head. The only negatives I had listed = on this=20 one were  fairly high institutional holding and a fairly big = rash of=20 recent insider selling. The unexpected airpockets in stocks like = SONC on=20 news that wasn't all that awful makes me think Mr. M is playing a = hand. I've=20 put this one on my "wait and see" list and will just let the chart = do what=20 it wants to do. Maybe it will become clearer then.
 
Katherine
kmalm@earthlink.net
----- Original Message ----- =
From:=20 Matt=20 & Alicia Leverette
To: canslim@lists.xmission.com= =20
Sent: Tuesday, November 06, = 2001 8:21=20 PM
Subject: [CANSLIM] = PECS

I would like to hear some of your thoughts on = this stock=20 and specifically todays action.  It looked as if PECS was = completing=20 a smooth cup, but today the price dropped almost 10% on 3 X = Average=20 Volume.  If volume dries up and a handle is formed would this = stock=20 be a buy or would today's action be a cause for = concern?
 
Thanks,
 
Matt


********************************************************= **********
This=20 email and any files transmitted with it from the ElPaso =
Corporation are=20 confidential and intended solely for the
use of the individual or = entity=20 to whom they are addressed.
If you have received this email in = error=20 please notify the=20 =
sender.
**********************************************************= ********
 - ------=_NextPart_000_0100_01C1674E.1D643120-- - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2001 07:27:43 -0500 From: "Tom Worley" Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] SDIX This is a multi-part message in MIME format. - ------=_NextPart_000_0063_01C1675D.B0D43040 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Dennis, Thru 9 months, it earned 13 cents, so certainly appears able to exceed = the full year forecast of 15 cents and a nice growth over last year. On = the other hand, the forecast for 2002 is for 24 cents, a further gain of = 60%. Looking back at the last four quarters of sales and earnings, this = looks difficult to me as those qtrs, while showing strong growth over = 2000, are sequentially pretty stagnant. So they had easy comparisons = this year, but appear to be faced with difficult comparisons next year. Fundies do not appear to justify a 100% gain in price from $4 to $8 in = just the past six weeks. They also just did an acquisition for stock, so = future quarters may show some non-recurring write offs. This could hurt = the appearance of the earnings. I suspect the price gain recently may be a reaction to valuations placed = on other pollution control companies from their acquisition offers = received, as well as an "expectation of future business" because of the = anthrax attacks. Still, the trailing PE is already 46, and projected PE = is about 35, pretty high valuation for a company not showing sequential = growth. Tom Worley stkguru@netside.net AIM: TexWorley ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Dennis Chia=20 To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20 Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2001 11:02 PM Subject: [CANSLIM] SDIX=20 Hi Canslimmers, will like to know your views of Strategic Diagnostics (SDIX) Its showing really strong interest on the Quicken Screens http://www.quicken.com/investments/strategies/?symbol=3DSDIX Thanks and good luck! :) Dennis - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. - ------=_NextPart_000_0063_01C1675D.B0D43040 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi Dennis,
 
Thru 9 months, it earned 13 cents, so certainly = appears able=20 to exceed the full year forecast of 15 cents and a nice growth over last = year.=20 On the other hand, the forecast for 2002 is for 24 cents, a further gain = of 60%.=20 Looking back at the last four quarters of sales and earnings, this looks = difficult to me as those qtrs, while showing strong growth over 2000, = are=20 sequentially pretty stagnant. So they had easy comparisons this year, = but appear=20 to be faced with difficult comparisons next year.
 
Fundies do not appear to justify a 100% gain in = price from $4=20 to $8 in just the past six weeks. They also just did an acquisition for = stock,=20 so future quarters may show some non-recurring write offs. This could = hurt the=20 appearance of the earnings.
 
I suspect the price gain recently may be a reaction = to=20 valuations placed on other pollution control companies from their = acquisition=20 offers received, as well as an "expectation of future business" because = of the=20 anthrax attacks. Still, the trailing PE is already 46, and projected PE = is about=20 35, pretty high valuation for a company not showing sequential=20 growth.
 
Tom Worley
stkguru@netside.net
AIM:=20 TexWorley
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Dennis=20 Chia
To: canslim@lists.xmission.com =
Sent: Tuesday, November 06, = 2001 11:02=20 PM
Subject: [CANSLIM] SDIX


Hi Canslimmers,

will like to know your views = of=20 Strategic Diagnostics (SDIX)

Its showing really strong interest = on the=20 Quicken Screens
htt= p://www.quicken.com/investments/strategies/?symbol=3DSDIX

Than= ks=20 and good luck!  :)

Dennis


-
-To=20 subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
-In= the=20 email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
-"unsubscribe = canslim".  Do=20 not use quotes in your email.
- ------=_NextPart_000_0063_01C1675D.B0D43040-- - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2001 08:12:31 -0500 From: "Tom Worley" Subject: [CANSLIM] Index charts and "M" This is a multi-part message in MIME format. - ------=_NextPart_000_0095_01C16763.F3652580 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable One of the methods I use to assess the state of "M" is to review a = number of index charts on a regular basis. Helps me see the "bigger = picture" rather than focusing on day to day movements. In looking at the charts this morning, I could not help but notice a few = things. First, the current rally on both Nasdaq and the Russell 2000 is quite = different from the April rally. The present ascent has a lower angle of = incline, and is on much stronger and more consistent volume. To me this = suggests it is more sustainable. In looking at NYSE Composite, DOW 30, S&P500 index charts, their current = ascent looks more like April's sharp rise, altho the volume appears to = be better and more consistent. Unfortunately, futures right now indicate we are going to give back a = measurable piece of the gains from the past two days, maybe half to a = full percent. Tom Worley stkguru@netside.net AIM: TexWorley - ------=_NextPart_000_0095_01C16763.F3652580 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
One of the methods I use to assess the state of "M" = is to=20 review a number of index charts on a regular basis. Helps me see the = "bigger=20 picture" rather than focusing on day to day movements.
 
In looking at the charts this morning, I could not = help but=20 notice a few things.
 
First, the current rally on both Nasdaq and the = Russell 2000=20 is quite different from the April rally. The present ascent has a lower = angle of=20 incline, and is on much stronger and more consistent volume. To me this = suggests=20 it is more sustainable.
 
In looking at NYSE Composite, DOW 30, S&P500 = index charts,=20 their current ascent looks more like April's sharp rise, altho the = volume=20 appears to be better and more consistent.
 
Unfortunately, futures right now indicate we are = going to give=20 back a measurable piece of the gains from the past two days, maybe half = to a=20 full percent.
 
Tom Worley
stkguru@netside.net
AIM:=20 TexWorley
- ------=_NextPart_000_0095_01C16763.F3652580-- - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: 7 Nov 2001 05:23:35 -0800 From: Tim@orerockon.com Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Secondary's Earl, maybe they need the cash to support their huge share buyback programs under the relaxed SEC rules! Just kidding (well, maybe not) At 09:35 PM 11/6/2001 -0700, you wrote: >Hey, what is it with all the secondary offerings right now? I noticed 2 of >today's post mentioned secondary's. In this latest rally, I purchased 2 >stocks, CPRT and BVF. Since that point, both have announced secondary >offerings. With CPRT, the stock went very weak and I finally bailed the >3rd time it fell below my -8% point. With BVF, the announcement caused the >stock to open about 6% below yesterday's close. Fortunately, support came >right in and the stock ended up in the black for the day, so maybe there is >hope on this one. Still, what is it about this timeframe that causes >everyone to offer more stock? > >- >-To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" >-In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or >-"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. Tim Fisher Ore-ROCK-On Rockhounding Web Site Pacific Fishery Biologists Information mailto:tim@OreRockOn.com WWW http://OreRockOn.com - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: 7 Nov 2001 05:32:56 -0800 From: Tim@orerockon.com Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] PECS All the IBD subscribers out there, where is the paper on all these breakouts/breakdowns? Stocks I am watching that broke down after breaking out are too numerous to mention, but FHRX is the latest. Of my recent purchases only FCN, MIKE, HRH & AJG are not broken down/in the process of breaking down. I only wish I hadn't taken my profits and run on FLIR in August. At 09:28 PM 11/6/2001 -0700, you wrote: >Boy, today would certainly put me on alert. This isn't an orderly fallback >with few sellers, and probably is the worst thing you could see in a >handle. I would want to see some good volume support before buying now, >and that makes for a high volume handle. > >At 08:21 PM 11/6/01 -0600, you wrote: > > If volume dries up and a handle is formed would this stock be a buy > >or would today's action be a cause for concern? Thanks, Matt > >- >-To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" >-In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or >-"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. Tim Fisher Ore-ROCK-On Rockhounding Web Site Pacific Fishery Biologists Information mailto:tim@OreRockOn.com WWW http://OreRockOn.com - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2001 21:43:56 +0800 From: Dennis Chia Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] SDIX Hi Tom, Thanks for your valuable comments and insight on SDIX, i really appreciate it :) Anyways, for personal disclosure, i have already a small position on the stock when it was trading at around $6+, am just wondering to add more to my position during the dips .... well, good luck for today! Cheers! Dennis At 07:27 AM 11/7/01 -0500, Tom Worley wrote: > Hi Dennis, Thru 9 months, it earned 13 cents, so certainly appears >able to exceed the full year forecast of 15 cents and a nice growth over >last year. On the other hand, the forecast for 2002 is for 24 cents, a >further gain of 60%. Looking back at the last four quarters of sales and >earnings, this looks difficult to me as those qtrs, while showing strong >growth over 2000, are sequentially pretty stagnant. So they had easy >comparisons this year, but appear to be faced with difficult comparisons >next year. Fundies do not appear to justify a 100% gain in price from $4 >to $8 in just the past six weeks. They also just did an acquisition for >stock, so future quarters may show some non-recurring write offs. This >could hurt the appearance of the earnings. I suspect the price gain >recently may be a reaction to valuations placed on other pollution control >companies from their acquisition offers received, as well as an >"expectation of future business" because of the anthrax attacks. Still, >the trailing PE is already 46, and projected PE is about 35, pretty high >valuation for a company not showing sequential growth. Tom Worley >stkguru@netside.net >AIM: TexWorley > ----- Original Message ----- From: Dennis Chia To: >canslim@lists.xmission.com Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2001 11:02 PM > Subject: [CANSLIM] SDIX > >Hi Canslimmers, > >will like to know your views of Strategic Diagnostics (SDIX) > >Its showing really strong interest on the Quicken Screens >http://www.quicken.com/investments/strategies/?symbol=SDIX > > :) > >Dennis > > >- >-To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" >-In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > Do not use quotes in your email. > > - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2001 07:49:54 -0600 From: "Katherine Malm" Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] PECS Good point, Tim. IBD's done some lip service to "playing skeptical" and pointing out failed breakouts, but I still think they're trying to protect their stance that April was the bottom and are editorially crippled until that's proven out. I think it also shows the weakness in CANSLIM in adequately addressing industry rotation in a trendless market. All the more reason for us to do our own homework. Katherine kmalm@earthlink.net - ----- Original Message ----- From: To: Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2001 7:32 AM Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] PECS > All the IBD subscribers out there, where is the paper on all these > breakouts/breakdowns? Stocks I am watching that broke down after breaking > out are too numerous to mention, but FHRX is the latest. Of my recent > purchases only FCN, MIKE, HRH & AJG are not broken down/in the process of > breaking down. I only wish I hadn't taken my profits and run on FLIR in August. > > At 09:28 PM 11/6/2001 -0700, you wrote: > >Boy, today would certainly put me on alert. This isn't an orderly fallback > >with few sellers, and probably is the worst thing you could see in a > >handle. I would want to see some good volume support before buying now, > >and that makes for a high volume handle. > > > >At 08:21 PM 11/6/01 -0600, you wrote: > > > If volume dries up and a handle is formed would this stock be a buy > > >or would today's action be a cause for concern? Thanks, Matt > > > >- > >-To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > >-In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > >-"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. > > Tim Fisher > Ore-ROCK-On Rockhounding Web Site > Pacific Fishery Biologists Information > mailto:tim@OreRockOn.com > WWW http://OreRockOn.com > > > - > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2001 08:22:04 -0600 From: "Katherine Malm" Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Secondary's I think BVF and CPRT are primary offerings, meaning the company will get the proceeds. I'd have to read the prospectus to see their intended use of proceeds, but in BVF's case, I'd bet they're taking advantage of a very good stock price and using it to retire a chunk of their substantial debt. As CPRT has no debt, I bet they're going to use it for acquisitions. Katherine kmalm@earthlink.net - ----- Original Message ----- From: To: Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2001 7:23 AM Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Secondary's > Earl, maybe they need the cash to support their huge share buyback programs > under the relaxed SEC rules! Just kidding (well, maybe not) > > At 09:35 PM 11/6/2001 -0700, you wrote: > >Hey, what is it with all the secondary offerings right now? I noticed 2 of > >today's post mentioned secondary's. In this latest rally, I purchased 2 > >stocks, CPRT and BVF. Since that point, both have announced secondary > >offerings. With CPRT, the stock went very weak and I finally bailed the > >3rd time it fell below my -8% point. With BVF, the announcement caused the > >stock to open about 6% below yesterday's close. Fortunately, support came > >right in and the stock ended up in the black for the day, so maybe there is > >hope on this one. Still, what is it about this timeframe that causes > >everyone to offer more stock? > > > >- > >-To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > >-In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > >-"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. > > Tim Fisher > Ore-ROCK-On Rockhounding Web Site > Pacific Fishery Biologists Information > mailto:tim@OreRockOn.com > WWW http://OreRockOn.com > > > - > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2001 09:58:39 -0500 From: "Dave" Subject: [CANSLIM] TARO TARO may be breaking out. Early volume looks encouraging. IBD ratings are excellent. - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2001 08:54:23 -0600 From: "Katherine Malm" Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] TARO Dave, Yeah, was watching that as well. Nice action so far. You think it has legs? I'm only skeptical due to weakness in other players. Also nice B/O on PNRA. Gap open on earnings news and increased guidance. So far holding the gap. Katherine kmalm@earthlink.net - ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dave" To: Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2001 8:58 AM Subject: [CANSLIM] TARO > TARO may be breaking out. Early volume looks encouraging. IBD ratings are > excellent. > > > - > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2001 17:26:14 -0800 From: "Howard Rodkin" Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] Microsoft Investor Website Just installed XP and every time I try to access my portfolio it closes down IE6 before it totals the portfolio. Very strange. - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2001 10:46:13 -0500 From: "Cefaloni, John L Jr. [AMSTA-AR-WEA]" Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] TARO Dave, Katherine, I was just taking a look at TARO's MACD-Hist (one of my favorite indicators) and I see a bearish diversion. The consecutively higher peaks in price on Oct 11, Oct 25, and today correspond to consecutively lower peaks in the MACD-Hist. That's a divergence that supposedly indicates an underlying weakness that will imminently lead to a pullback. Perhaps the stock will stall at 48 and drop back to form a handle? Nice volume today, though. I'll be watching with interest. John C. - -----Original Message----- From: Katherine Malm [mailto:kmalm@earthlink.net] Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2001 9:54 AM To: canslim@lists.xmission.com Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] TARO Dave, Yeah, was watching that as well. Nice action so far. You think it has legs? I'm only skeptical due to weakness in other players. Also nice B/O on PNRA. Gap open on earnings news and increased guidance. So far holding the gap. Katherine kmalm@earthlink.net - ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dave" To: Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2001 8:58 AM Subject: [CANSLIM] TARO > TARO may be breaking out. Early volume looks encouraging. IBD ratings are > excellent. > > > - > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2001 09:35:50 -0600 From: "Katherine Malm" Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] TARO Thanks for your insight. Though I don't use MACD, I'd reached the same conclusion on TARO. Maybe this will turn out to be a learning point... Katherine - ----- Original Message ----- From: "Cefaloni, John L Jr. [AMSTA-AR-WEA]" To: Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2001 9:46 AM Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] TARO > Dave, Katherine, > > I was just taking a look at TARO's MACD-Hist (one of my favorite indicators) > and I see a bearish diversion. The consecutively higher peaks in price on > Oct 11, Oct 25, and today correspond to consecutively lower peaks in the > MACD-Hist. That's a divergence that supposedly indicates an underlying > weakness that will imminently lead to a pullback. Perhaps the stock will > stall at 48 and drop back to form a handle? Nice volume today, though. > I'll be watching with interest. > > John C. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Katherine Malm [mailto:kmalm@earthlink.net] > Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2001 9:54 AM > To: canslim@lists.xmission.com > Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] TARO > > > Dave, > > Yeah, was watching that as well. Nice action so far. You think it has legs? > I'm only skeptical due to weakness in other players. > > Also nice B/O on PNRA. Gap open on earnings news and increased guidance. So > far holding the gap. > > Katherine > kmalm@earthlink.net > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Dave" > To: > Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2001 8:58 AM > Subject: [CANSLIM] TARO > > > > TARO may be breaking out. Early volume looks encouraging. IBD ratings are > > excellent. > > > > > > - > > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. > > > - > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. > > - > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ End of canslim-digest V2 #1787 ****************************** To unsubscribe to canslim-digest, send an email to "majordomo@xmission.com" with "unsubscribe canslim-digest" in the body of the message. For information on digests or retrieving files and old messages send "help" to the same address. Do not use quotes in your message.