From: owner-canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com (canslim-digest) To: canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com Subject: canslim-digest V2 #1988 Reply-To: canslim Sender: owner-canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com Errors-To: owner-canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com Precedence: bulk Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-No-Archive: yes canslim-digest Saturday, December 22 2001 Volume 02 : Number 1988 In this issue: OT - Quality of home construction (was Re: [CANSLIM] Worley's Weekend - New home sales) Japan's economy (was Re: [CANSLIM] Worley's Weekend Weeview) Re: [CANSLIM] large file FTP Re: [CANSLIM] large file FTP ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2001 17:26:05 -0500 From: "Tom Worley" Subject: OT - Quality of home construction (was Re: [CANSLIM] Worley's Weekend - New home sales) This is a multi-part message in MIME format. - ------=_NextPart_000_002F_01C18B0D.BCAD6340 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Bill, I must heartily agree with you, without offense to Katherine or = any others in the group in this industry. I bought a new home in 1973 (townhouse, VA), and existing homes in 1976 = (CA), 1979 (MI), 1983 (Miami, actually a liveaboard sailboat), and 1987 = (also Miami). The best built of all of them is my present home built in = 1951, before there was much in the way of building codes. The next best = was the sailboat built 1973, before boat builders had developed = fiberglass construction fully (so they over built). My present home has = roof beams of long grain Florida pine, no knotholes, built and assembled = on site, with hurricane straps on every single beam (current code calls = for a strap on every third beam, and most beams are 2X6 preassembled = rather than the 2X10 beams that I have. After the Cuban Mariel migration in the early 80s, thousands of new = homes were thrown up in this area to accommodate all the new arrivals. = We saw the disaster of that action when Hurricane Andrew hit in 1992. = When my home was built, the contractor essentially relied on his = professionalism on the standards to follow. Now, they seem to only meet = the minimum requirements of building codes in order to stay competitive = and cost efficient. But despite all this, there is still a demand for housing that outstrips = existing homes up for sale. Many first time buyers have not yet (just as = was my case) discovered the charm and value of buying an existing home = over a brand spanking new one. Because of this, if new home sales = continues strong in 2002, I would also expect to see the housing permits = and starts also remain strong. The home builders group therefore would = benefit. Tom Worley stkguru@netside.net AIM: TexWorley ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Bill Triffet=20 To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20 Sent: Saturday, December 22, 2001 2:40 PM Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Worley's Weekend - New home sales Hope this doesn't go too far off topic but... I would think there are other factors affecting home builders. A big = one for many is driving distance. In the most populated areas of the country "affordable" housing in generally built on the outskirts. Here in Los Angeles, that means a 50-60 mile commute. Most folks here buy existing = homes (as I just did 3 months ago). On a personal note: I consider most new homes to be quite inferior in regards to construction compared to the older ones (no disregard for = your families business btw). My last house was built in the 40's. It = withstood every earthquake since then. My "new" home was built in the 50's. Same situation. Plus, the big feature - character. My main point is that existing home sales may have a larger impact on = the economy just by the shear volume. I will still need (need???) new = furniture, paint, carpet, and lets not forget my new financing I did as well. Add = to that, I sold my last house to someone coming from an apartment so = there lies more economic stimulus as well. Besides, I don't think homebuilders = were a good indicator of the 90's bull market. -Bill Triffet ----- Original Message ----- From: "Katherine Malm" To: Sent: Saturday, December 22, 2001 10:02 AM Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Worley's Weekend Weeview Hello Tom, At last, I am compelled to comment on your excellent WWW... The normal figure bandied about on spending related to new home = purchases is 6 to 1. If I spend $100K on a new home, these dollars will recirculate = 6 times into the economy. (Wonder how many times your pentium purchase recirculates?!) So, seeing a marked downturn in the home figures would really worry the economists. Greenspan, in particular, focuses on this = and was quite worried when long term rates remained sticky, despite the = lowering of short term rates. I still see the strength in recent home sales reflecting the "hurry up and get it done before the rates go up again syndrome." In Austin, for example, the homebuilders have been in = aggressive selling mode for quite some time. Every day, the deal is sweetened. = $10,000 in extras! First two years financing at 4%! Cash at close to cover = your moving expenses! Free maid for life! (Well, I made that one up.) = Bigger homebuilders make most of their money not on the home, but on the = financing. If they are having to lower mortgage rates to lure the customer, their margins are going to be squeezed going forward. That means in the = coming year, the homebuilders will have more difficult Q over Q or Y over Y comparisons. Also, my own family owns a construction business, so I = have seen these cycles first hand. You are right that the consumer seems = willing to take on the additional debt and I think that, along with other = economic indicators, says that the economy is far from plunging into the = depths. But these things don't necessarily translate into good equity investments. Happy Holidays, Katherine - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. - ------=_NextPart_000_002F_01C18B0D.BCAD6340 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Bill, I must heartily agree with you, without = offense to=20 Katherine or any others in the group in this industry.
 
I bought a new home in 1973 (townhouse, VA), and = existing=20 homes in 1976 (CA), 1979 (MI), 1983 (Miami, actually a liveaboard = sailboat), and=20 1987 (also Miami). The best built of all of them is my present home = built in=20 1951, before there was much in the way of building codes. The next best = was the=20 sailboat built 1973, before boat builders had developed fiberglass = construction=20 fully (so they over built). My present home has roof beams of long grain = Florida=20 pine, no knotholes, built and assembled on site, with hurricane straps = on every=20 single beam (current code calls for a strap on every third beam, and = most beams=20 are 2X6 preassembled rather than the 2X10 beams that I = have.
 
After the Cuban Mariel migration in the early 80s, = thousands=20 of new homes were thrown up in this area to accommodate all the new = arrivals. We=20 saw the disaster of that action when Hurricane Andrew hit in 1992. When = my home=20 was built, the contractor essentially relied on his professionalism on = the=20 standards to follow. Now, they seem to only meet the minimum = requirements of=20 building codes in order to stay competitive and cost = efficient.
 
But despite all this, there is still a demand for = housing that=20 outstrips existing homes up for sale. Many first time buyers have not = yet (just=20 as was my case) discovered the charm and value of buying an existing = home over a=20 brand spanking new one. Because of this, if new home sales continues = strong in=20 2002, I would also expect to see the housing permits and starts also = remain=20 strong. The home builders group therefore would benefit.
 
Tom Worley
stkguru@netside.net
AIM:=20 TexWorley
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Bill=20 Triffet
To: canslim@lists.xmission.com =
Sent: Saturday, December 22, = 2001 2:40=20 PM
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Worley's = Weekend -=20 New home sales

Hope this doesn't go too far off topic but...
I = would think=20 there are other factors affecting home builders. A big one for
many = is=20 driving distance. In the most populated areas of the = country
"affordable"=20 housing in generally built on the outskirts. Here in Los
Angeles, = that=20 means a 50-60 mile commute. Most folks here buy existing homes
(as = I just=20 did 3 months ago).

On a personal note: I consider most new = homes to be=20 quite inferior in
regards to construction compared to the older = ones (no=20 disregard for your
families business btw). My last house was built = in the=20 40's. It withstood
every earthquake since then. My "new" home was = built in=20 the 50's. Same
situation. Plus, the big feature - = character.

My main=20 point is that existing home sales may have a larger impact on = the
economy=20 just by the shear volume. I will still need (need???) new = furniture,
paint,=20 carpet, and lets not forget my new financing I did as well. Add = to
that, I=20 sold my last house to someone coming from an apartment so there = lies
more=20 economic stimulus as well. Besides, I don't think homebuilders were = a
good=20 indicator of the 90's bull market.

-Bill=20 Triffet




----- Original Message -----
From: = "Katherine=20 Malm" <kmalm@earthlink.net>
To: = <canslim@lists.xmission.com= >
Sent:=20 Saturday, December 22, 2001 10:02 AM
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] = Worley's=20 Weekend Weeview


Hello Tom,

At last, I am compelled = to=20 comment on your excellent WWW...

The normal figure bandied = about on=20 spending related to new home purchases is
6 to 1. If I spend $100K = on a new=20 home, these dollars will recirculate 6
times into the economy. = (Wonder how=20 many times your pentium purchase
recirculates?!) So, seeing a = marked=20 downturn in the home figures would
really worry the economists. = Greenspan,=20 in particular, focuses on this and
was quite worried when long term = rates=20 remained sticky, despite the lowering
of short term rates. I still = see the=20 strength in recent home sales
reflecting the "hurry up and get it = done=20 before the rates go up again
syndrome." In Austin, for example, the = homebuilders have been in aggressive
selling mode for quite some = time.=20 Every day, the deal is sweetened. $10,000
in extras! First two = years=20 financing at 4%! Cash at close to cover your
moving expenses! Free = maid for=20 life! (Well, I made that one up.) Bigger
homebuilders make most of = their=20 money not on the home, but on the financing.
If they are having to = lower=20 mortgage rates to lure the customer, their
margins are going to be = squeezed=20 going forward. That means in the coming
year, the homebuilders will = have=20 more difficult Q over Q or Y over Y
comparisons. Also, my own = family owns a=20 construction business, so I have
seen these cycles first hand. You = are=20 right that the consumer seems willing
to take on the additional = debt and I=20 think that, along with other economic
indicators, says that the = economy is=20 far from plunging into the depths. But
these things don't = necessarily=20 translate into good equity investments.

Happy=20 Holidays,
Katherine



-
-To subscribe/unsubscribe, = email=20 "majordomo@xmission.com"
-In= =20 the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
-"unsubscribe = canslim". =20 Do not use quotes in your email.
- ------=_NextPart_000_002F_01C18B0D.BCAD6340-- - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2001 17:38:35 -0500 From: "Tom Worley" Subject: Japan's economy (was Re: [CANSLIM] Worley's Weekend Weeview) This is a multi-part message in MIME format. - ------=_NextPart_000_003D_01C18B0F.7BA70C00 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Doug, I am not sure I understand your question, so if I miss your point, = please ask again. Japan is currently suffering inflation in the midst of recession. That = means they are making less while products end up costing more. That's a = double insult to the second largest economy in the world. There are some = indications that they are also trying to weaken the yen to make their = exports cheaper on the world market, and thereby increase domestic = business activity for their companies that are mostly exporters. But = that also means the Japanese must pay more for any items they import. At the same time, the ordinary Japanese citizen has no place to put his = savings where he can get a meaningful interest return. Even for most = Japanese corps, they are forced into buying Japanese govt bonds = currently paying a yield of about 1.32%. Several years ago, there was a = lot of media fear (and commentary) regarding what would happen when the = Japanese started selling their holdings in US govt and corporate bonds, = as their holdings were substantial. Truth is, while it likely sold many = newspapers, it never really happened, as the safety and rate of return = was far superior to anything the money could buy back in Japan. What = money they have that they can invest here is likely to stay here until = such time as there are more attractive prospects back home. To date, I have not seen any credible reports of significant Japanese = repatriation of their US investments, with the exception of isolated = corporate cases where they had to do so to meet capital requirements = back home. That is on a case by case basis, and related to companies = usually on the verge of bankruptcy, or suffering major capital losses = otherwise. Tom Worley stkguru@netside.net AIM: TexWorley ----- Original Message -----=20 From: DOUG CHIURATO=20 To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20 Sent: Saturday, December 22, 2001 3:52 PM Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Worley's Weekend Weeview Tom =20 I originally sent this last week after reading your WWW. I had some = questions related to your Japan section. My ISP Qwest is combining with = MSN and the transition occured while I've been traveling. So between = some problems with that transition and with the list service it looks = like my response to your WWW didnt get through. So anyway here's a copy = of what I tried to send last week.=20 =20 =20 I have some combination question comments regarding the economy = relating to comments in your weekly review. I'm very weak on this = subject so please go easy on me. You mentioned that Japan is = experiencing a pickup in inflation. They've been in a deflationary = environment for most of the 90's havent they? so with this perspective = isnt inflation, relative to the deflationary times, a good thing? On = page 97 of the The Hedge Fund Edge Mark Boucher writes this paragraph = 'How long will the Japanese keep spilling money into our markets? = Probably until Japanese domestic inflation heats up or until their = economy picks up sufficiently to cut back the need for liquification.' = (That book was published in '99) Up until this point havent the Japanese = interest rates been almost zero. Havent the Japanese been one of the = major buyers of our long term bonds making money with the difference = between their short term rates and our long term rates. If they are = starting to experience inflation will they be starting to raise rates? = How much money have they already been pulling out of our bonds? Hasnt = this been a big fear all along or have they already been cashing out of = bonds. Sorry for all the questions. I just know so little about this but = it does appear to have some importance in the whole scheme of global = economy/stock markets. Hopefully you can help clear up some of my = confusion. ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Tom Worley=20 To: CANSLIM=20 Sent: Saturday, December 15, 2001 8:18 PM Subject: [CANSLIM] Worley's Weekend Weeview EARNINGS WARNING SEASON It's that time of the quarter again, and the news releases on what = to expect from corporate America for the current quarter are starting to = roll in, and will heat up next week. I get an almost daily email this = time of the quarter summarizing what was released, and my overall = impression is that more are raising expectations or confirming forecasts = than are lowering expectations, both on revenues and earnings. In the = 3rd qtr, earnings for the S&P500 fell nearly 22%, worst fall year over = year in a decade. For the 4th quarter, expectations are for a drop of = 19%, better but still not good. But with both INTC and CSCO saying nice = things, as well as PG, even MRK's forecast of no growth for 2002 fades = in importance as it is company related more than sector related.=20 - -------------------------------------------------------------------------= - --- JAPAN What can I say? This second largest economy remains mired in = government inaction and indecisiveness. The banking industry remains on = the verge of collapse, overwhelmed by bad loans. This past week, one of = the largest banks (Asahi) finally cut off credit to Aoki Corp, which = promptly filed bankruptcy, leading to fears that other banks will start = cutting off corps with whom they have long standing business = relationships. On Thursday, the banking index (now at new 3 year lows) = led the Nikkei to losses that wiped out what was made on Wednesday. = Everyone seems to be worried, or even panicking, except the government = who this week pulled off a successful devaluation of the yen, moving it = to a three year low against the US dollar. While this may temporarily = strengthen their exports, it will also raise the cost of imports, = leading to more inflation during their recession. And it will also = likely cause other devaluations of currency throughout Asia as those = countries try to hold onto market share. China and Malaysia may be hurt = the worst by this, as they have pegged their currency to the dollar, and = will try to defend it. Ultimately, this could lead to another financial = crisis similar to 1997 when Thailand started the domino effect. But with = Japan, the biggest economy in Asia, starting the process, it could = happen a lot faster this time.=20 - -------------------------------------------------------------------------= - --- FED CUT The news wasn't that they cut 25 BP (basis points), it was that they = left the bias in place, suggesting the possibility of another 25 BP cut = at the January meeting. - -------------------------------------------------------------------------= - --- ON THE ECONOMY No surprise, at least it shouldn't have been, the auto makers = couldn't keep up the Japanese style of zero percent loans in order to = induce buying decisions. As a result, retail sales fell more than = expected to 3.7% (expected was a 3.1% drop) after rising 6.4% jump in = October (almost all on car sales). Still, that's nearly a 3% net for two = months, guess we'll take that, even if Christmas sales at the retailers = appear so far to be slower than anticipated. But the PPI (Producer Price = Index) also fell more than expected, to 0.6% (expected was a drop to 0.3 = or 0.4%), down further from October, hinting that inflation continues to = be a no show.=20 - -------------------------------------------------------------------------= - --- WORLEY'S WATCHLIST WANNABES Appears like I will have fewer stocks to consider this weekend As always, Bx means a flat line "B"ase of "x" weeks, IMO. If I see = other formations like c&h, double bottom, LLUR, CAT, RAT, I will say so. ACS - LLUR ACTN - RAT LLUR AGM - B3 ASF - c&h, handle drooping on declining volume BIOA - RAT LLUR BLL - LLUR, earnings decline forecasted for Q4 BOKF - LLUR BPRX - uptrending B5, stealth b/o Thursday BVF - RAT LLUR BZH - looking at this one again, I see a c&h on a c&h, unusual = pattern, I suspect a weekly chart might smooth it out into a larger, = stronger c&h formation CACI - LLUR CVBF - B8 DLX - LLUR DNB - LLUR FMT - c&h, b/o Friday, within 5% of pivot, low priced FRED - LLUR GAIA - saucer, b/o Wed, declining to support on lower volume GAN - CAT LLUR GFF - CAT LLUR HRB - B2 ISLE - B2 ITRI - CAT LLUR JCI - B5 JNC - LLUR KSS - high handle MATW - B3 MIMS - LLUR NFI - LLUR PHC - B10, tight range RAH - LLUR RKT - base on the handle, second handle?? RYAAY - B5 RYAN - LLUR THC - B4 TIER - LLUR Happy Hunting, God Bless America, and all its military people =20 Tom Worley stkguru@netside.net AIM: TexWorley - ------=_NextPart_000_003D_01C18B0F.7BA70C00 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi Doug,
 
I am not sure I understand your question, so if I = miss your=20 point, please ask again.
 
Japan is currently suffering inflation in the midst = of=20 recession. That means they are making less while products end up costing = more.=20 That's a double insult to the second largest economy in the world. There = are=20 some indications that they are also trying to weaken the yen to make = their=20 exports cheaper on the world market, and thereby increase domestic = business=20 activity for their companies that are mostly exporters. But that also = means the=20 Japanese must pay more for any items they import.
 
At the same time, the ordinary Japanese citizen has = no place=20 to put his savings where he can get a meaningful interest return. Even = for most=20 Japanese corps, they are forced into buying Japanese govt bonds = currently paying=20 a yield of about 1.32%. Several years ago, there was a lot of media fear = (and=20 commentary) regarding what would happen when the Japanese started = selling their=20 holdings in US govt and corporate bonds, as their holdings were = substantial.=20 Truth is, while it likely sold many newspapers, it never really = happened, as the=20 safety and rate of return was far superior to anything the money could = buy back=20 in Japan. What money they have that they can invest here is likely to = stay here=20 until such time as there are more attractive prospects back = home.
 
To date, I have not seen any credible reports of = significant=20 Japanese repatriation of their US investments, with the exception of = isolated=20 corporate cases where they had to do so to meet capital requirements = back home.=20 That is on a case by case basis, and related to companies usually on the = verge=20 of bankruptcy, or suffering major capital losses otherwise.
 
Tom Worley
stkguru@netside.net
AIM:=20 TexWorley
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 DOUG=20 CHIURATO
To: canslim@lists.xmission.com =
Sent: Saturday, December 22, = 2001 3:52=20 PM
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Worley's = Weekend=20 Weeview

Tom
 
I originally sent this last week = after=20 reading your WWW. I had some questions related to your = Japan=20 section. My ISP Qwest is combining with MSN and the transition = occured=20 while I've been traveling.  So between some problems = with that=20 transition and with the list service it looks like my response to = your=20 WWW didnt get through.  So anyway here's a copy of what I = tried to=20 send last week.
 
 
I have some combination question = comments=20 regarding the economy relating to comments in your weekly review. = I'm=20 very weak on this subject so please go easy on me. You mentioned that = Japan is=20 experiencing a pickup in inflation. They've been in a deflationary = environment=20 for most of the 90's havent they? so with this perspective isnt = inflation,=20 relative to the deflationary times, a good thing? On page 97 of the = The Hedge=20 Fund Edge Mark Boucher writes this paragraph 'How long will the = Japanese keep=20 spilling money into our markets? Probably until Japanese domestic = inflation=20 heats up or until their economy picks up sufficiently to cut back the = need for=20 liquification.' (That book was published in '99) Up until this point = havent=20 the Japanese interest rates been almost zero. Havent the Japanese been = one of=20 the major buyers of our long term bonds making money with the = difference=20 between their short term rates and our long term rates. If they are = starting=20 to experience inflation will they be starting to raise rates? How much = money=20 have they already been pulling out of our bonds? Hasnt this been a big = fear=20 all along or have they already been cashing out of bonds. Sorry = for all=20 the questions. I just know so little about this but it does appear to = have=20 some importance in the whole scheme of global economy/stock markets. = Hopefully=20 you can help clear up some of my confusion.
 
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Tom=20 Worley
To: CANSLIM
Sent: Saturday, December 15, = 2001 8:18=20 PM
Subject: [CANSLIM] Worley's = Weekend=20 Weeview

EARNINGS WARNING = SEASON
It's that time of the quarter again, and the = news releases=20 on what to expect from corporate America for the current quarter are = starting to roll in, and will heat up next week.  I get an = almost daily=20 email this time of the quarter summarizing what was released, and my = overall=20 impression is that more are raising expectations or confirming = forecasts=20 than are lowering expectations, both on revenues and earnings. In = the 3rd=20 qtr, earnings for the S&P500 fell nearly 22%, worst fall year = over year=20 in a decade. For the 4th quarter, expectations are for a drop of = 19%, better=20 but still not good. But with both INTC and CSCO saying nice things, = as well=20 as PG, even MRK's forecast of no growth for 2002 fades in importance = as it=20 is company related more than sector related.=20
JAPAN
What can I say? This second largest economy = remains mired=20 in government inaction and indecisiveness. The banking industry = remains on=20 the verge of collapse, overwhelmed by bad loans. This past week, one = of the=20 largest banks (Asahi) finally cut off credit to Aoki Corp, which = promptly=20 filed bankruptcy, leading to fears that other banks will start = cutting off=20 corps with whom they have long standing business relationships. On = Thursday,=20 the banking index (now at new 3 year lows) led the Nikkei to losses = that=20 wiped out what was made on Wednesday. Everyone seems to be worried, = or even=20 panicking, except the government who this week pulled off a = successful=20 devaluation of the yen, moving it to a three year low against the US = dollar.=20 While this may temporarily strengthen their exports, it will also = raise the=20 cost of imports, leading to more inflation during their recession. = And it=20 will also likely cause other devaluations of currency throughout = Asia as=20 those countries try to hold onto market share. China and Malaysia = may be=20 hurt the worst by this, as they have pegged their currency to the = dollar,=20 and will try to defend it. Ultimately, this could lead to another = financial=20 crisis similar to 1997 when Thailand started the domino effect. But=20 with Japan, the biggest economy in Asia, starting the process, = it could=20 happen a lot faster this time.=20
FED CUT
The news wasn't that they cut 25 BP (basis = points), it was=20 that they left the bias in place, suggesting the possibility of = another 25=20 BP cut at the January meeting.
ON THE ECONOMY
No surprise, at least it shouldn't have been, the auto makers = couldn't=20 keep up the Japanese style of zero percent loans in order to induce = buying=20 decisions. As a result, retail sales fell more than expected to 3.7% = (expected was a 3.1% drop) after rising 6.4% jump in October (almost = all on=20 car sales). Still, that's nearly a 3% net for two months, guess = we'll take=20 that, even if Christmas sales at the retailers appear so far to be = slower=20 than anticipated. But the PPI (Producer Price Index) also fell more = than=20 expected, to 0.6% (expected was a drop to 0.3 or 0.4%), down further = from=20 October, hinting that inflation continues to be a no show.=20
WORLEY'S WATCHLIST WANNABES
Appears like I will have fewer stocks to consider this = weekend
As always, Bx means a flat line "B"ase of "x" weeks, IMO. If I = see=20 other formations like c&h, double bottom, LLUR, CAT, RAT, I will = say=20 so.
 
ACS - LLUR
ACTN - RAT LLUR
AGM - B3
ASF - c&h, handle drooping on declining volume
BIOA - RAT LLUR
BLL - LLUR, earnings decline forecasted for Q4
BOKF - LLUR
BPRX - uptrending B5, stealth b/o Thursday
BVF - RAT LLUR
BZH - looking at this one again, I see a c&h on a c&h, = unusual=20 pattern, I suspect a weekly chart might smooth it out into a larger, = stronger c&h formation
CACI - LLUR
CVBF - B8
DLX - LLUR
DNB - LLUR
FMT - c&h, b/o Friday, within 5% of pivot, low priced
FRED - LLUR
GAIA - saucer, b/o Wed, declining to support on lower = volume
GAN - CAT LLUR
GFF - CAT LLUR
HRB - B2
ISLE - B2
ITRI - CAT LLUR
JCI - B5
JNC - LLUR
KSS - high handle
MATW - B3
MIMS - LLUR
NFI - LLUR
PHC - B10, tight range
RAH - LLUR
RKT - base on the handle, second handle??
RYAAY - B5
RYAN - LLUR
THC - B4
TIER - LLUR
 
Happy Hunting,
 
God Bless America, and all its military people
 
Tom Worley
stkguru@netside.net
AIM:=20 TexWorley
- ------=_NextPart_000_003D_01C18B0F.7BA70C00-- - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2001 23:38:38 EST From: Spencer48@aol.com Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] large file FTP DC: I saved this from Jeff Salisbury (the administrator of this forum) because I thought it might be helpful in the future. I hope it's what you're looking for: Subj: [CANSLIM] Sending large or non-text files to the canslim group Date: 12/2/2001 10:02:33 AM Eastern Standard Time From: owner-canslim@xmission.com (Jeff Salisbury) Sender: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com Reply-to: canslim@lists.xmission.com To: canslim@xmission.com Everyone, There are times when you may wish to share large or non-text files with our group (i.e. gif, jpeg, spreadsheets, etc). Our list is configured to reject all files over 80K. You can attach files under this threshold to your email posting. While files under this 80K threshold are delivered by the canslim list software, receiving mail servers often reject files over 40K. This means that while your file was delivered by the canslim mail server, many users will not have received it because their mail server rejected it... This does not mean you cannot share large files with the group. Rather, the BEST way to share large files with the group (even those under 80K) is to place the file at an ftp site, and then refer to the link in your canslim posting. This way, the reader can read your posting, click on the link, and instantly see what you are talking about. If you have your own ftp site, feel free to use it. If you do not have access to your own ftp site, we have provided an anonymous ftp site. To provide your file to the group, please follow these instructions: 1. Send your file to: "ftp://ftp.xmission.com/pub/users/m/mcjathan/incoming/". If you don't know how to ftp a file, you can use the ftp instructions at the bottom of this message. 2. After not more than 15 minutes, your file will be available for everyone at the URL of: http://WallStreet-LLC.com/pub/your_file_name where "your_file_name" is the exact name of the file you uploaded. This file name should NOT have spaces or other strange characters. Letter, numbers, and "." are always good, i.e. "canslim_25.gif". 3. Before posting your message to the group, test the URL of your file by copying the web address: http://WallStreet-LLC.com/pub/your_file_name into your browser and seeing if your browser displays the file properly. 4. Finally, send your message to the group describing your file, and be sure to explicity include the URL of your file. Although this may seem unwieldy at first, it really isn't too bad and it solves more problems than it creates. If you have any problems with this procedure, feel free to contact me at mcjathan@xmission.com. Best Regards, Jeff Salisbury =========================================================================== Netscape FTP Instructions: 1. Using Netscape, go to the URL: ftp://ftp.xmission.com/pub/users/m/mcjathan/incoming/ 2. On the Netscape "File" menu, select "Upload File..." This will open a file selection widget on your hard-drive. Select the file you wish to upload and hit the "Ok" button. At this point, your file will be uploaded. 3. Eventhough your file has been uploaded, you will not be able to see the file in your netscape browser. The reason for this is that the "incoming" directory is set to write-only for security reasons. Internet Explorer FTP Instructions: 1. Using "Internet Explorer", go to the URL: ftp://ftp.xmission.com/pub/users/m/mcjathan/incoming/ 2. Open "Windows Explorer" to browse your local hard-drive. Find the file you want to send. Select the file by clicking once. The right-click and "copy" the file. 3. Go back to the Internet Explorer window. Right-click and "paste" the file. It will be uploaded to the canslim ftp site. In a message dated 12/21/2001 3:37:20 PM Eastern Standard Time, dcsquires1@home.com writes: << Can someone tell me how to send large files to the FTP site. I have forgotten how to do it. DSquires >> - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2001 23:40:33 EST From: Spencer48@aol.com Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] large file FTP DC: I saved this from Jeff Salisbury (the administrator of this forum) because I thought it might be helpful in the future. I hope it's what you're looking for. jans Subj: [CANSLIM] Sending large or non-text files to the canslim group Date: 12/2/2001 10:02:33 AM Eastern Standard Time From: owner-canslim@xmission.com (Jeff Salisbury) Sender: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com Reply-to: canslim@lists.xmission.com To: canslim@xmission.com Everyone, There are times when you may wish to share large or non-text files with our group (i.e. gif, jpeg, spreadsheets, etc). Our list is configured to reject all files over 80K. You can attach files under this threshold to your email posting. While files under this 80K threshold are delivered by the canslim list software, receiving mail servers often reject files over 40K. This means that while your file was delivered by the canslim mail server, many users will not have received it because their mail server rejected it... This does not mean you cannot share large files with the group. Rather, the BEST way to share large files with the group (even those under 80K) is to place the file at an ftp site, and then refer to the link in your canslim posting. This way, the reader can read your posting, click on the link, and instantly see what you are talking about. If you have your own ftp site, feel free to use it. If you do not have access to your own ftp site, we have provided an anonymous ftp site. To provide your file to the group, please follow these instructions: 1. Send your file to: "ftp://ftp.xmission.com/pub/users/m/mcjathan/incoming/". If you don't know how to ftp a file, you can use the ftp instructions at the bottom of this message. 2. After not more than 15 minutes, your file will be available for everyone at the URL of: http://WallStreet-LLC.com/pub/your_file_name where "your_file_name" is the exact name of the file you uploaded. This file name should NOT have spaces or other strange characters. Letter, numbers, and "." are always good, i.e. "canslim_25.gif". 3. Before posting your message to the group, test the URL of your file by copying the web address: http://WallStreet-LLC.com/pub/your_file_name into your browser and seeing if your browser displays the file properly. 4. Finally, send your message to the group describing your file, and be sure to explicity include the URL of your file. Although this may seem unwieldy at first, it really isn't too bad and it solves more problems than it creates. If you have any problems with this procedure, feel free to contact me at mcjathan@xmission.com. Best Regards, Jeff Salisbury =========================================================================== Netscape FTP Instructions: 1. Using Netscape, go to the URL: ftp://ftp.xmission.com/pub/users/m/mcjathan/incoming/ 2. On the Netscape "File" menu, select "Upload File..." This will open a file selection widget on your hard-drive. Select the file you wish to upload and hit the "Ok" button. At this point, your file will be uploaded. 3. Eventhough your file has been uploaded, you will not be able to see the file in your netscape browser. The reason for this is that the "incoming" directory is set to write-only for security reasons. Internet Explorer FTP Instructions: 1. Using "Internet Explorer", go to the URL: ftp://ftp.xmission.com/pub/users/m/mcjathan/incoming/ 2. Open "Windows Explorer" to browse your local hard-drive. Find the file you want to send. Select the file by clicking once. The right-click and "copy" the file. 3. Go back to the Internet Explorer window. Right-click and "paste" the file. It will be uploaded to the canslim ftp site. In a message dated 12/21/2001 3:37:20 PM Eastern Standard Time, dcsquires1@home.com writes: << Can someone tell me how to send large files to the FTP site. I have forgotten how to do it. DSquires >> - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ End of canslim-digest V2 #1988 ****************************** To unsubscribe to canslim-digest, send an email to "majordomo@xmission.com" with "unsubscribe canslim-digest" in the body of the message. For information on digests or retrieving files and old messages send "help" to the same address. Do not use quotes in your message.