From: owner-canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com (canslim-digest) To: canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com Subject: canslim-digest V2 #2163 Reply-To: canslim Sender: owner-canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com Errors-To: owner-canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com Precedence: bulk Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-No-Archive: yes canslim-digest Monday, February 25 2002 Volume 02 : Number 2163 In this issue: RE: [CANSLIM] Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2002 15:11:27 -0500 Re: [CANSLIM] Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2002 15:11:27 -0500 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2002 09:06:12 -0500 From: "Cefaloni, John L Jr. [AMSTA-AR-WEA]" Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2002 15:11:27 -0500 This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. - ------_=_NextPart_001_01C1BE05.94E98390 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Katherine, With all due respect, what harm would be done to your portfolio by revealing what stocks you are looking to buy/short - or at least what stocks you just bought/shorted? John C. - -----Original Message----- From: Katherine Malm [mailto:kmalm@earthlink.net] Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 8:54 AM To: canslim@lists.xmission.com Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2002 15:11:27 -0500 Morning, Tom. It was a funny thing admitting those feelings to the list as I don't think I had even admitted it to myself in quite those words. But the truth is, I'll go out of my way to help absolutely anybody, share what I know so that others can become better investors, and ask plenty of questions and listen in order to learn from others and become a better investor myself. But by golly....when it comes to my money and the issue of privacy....I look at it very differently. There are only of couple of things I *won't* do....discuss specifics on performance, tell people what stocks I'm looking to buy/short, or reveal the positions I'm currently in. Short list, but that's just part of the guidelines I've set. I can't say I'm all that thrilled about the list turning into some big "collective mining effort," but Duke's a sport for bringing it up and I admire his in-your-face attitude about getting the effort underway as there *are* list members who will benefit. Have a great day, Katherine - ----- Original Message ----- From: Tom Worley To: canslim@lists.xmission.com Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 5:36 AM Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2002 15:11:27 -0500 Katherine, I am quite willing to admit the same thing, I put a huge amount of work into my investing, and intend that I benefit from it. My style is strictly my own, and I have found that since I gave up handling retail clients that I make far better decisions for myself without the responsibility for others. I am sure many members must have thought I was insane a few weeks ago when I mentioned that I not only fully invested my cash acct, but went to the full margin limits as well. Despite a very dismal "M" since then, I am up over 13% (and yeah, for the doubters I can prove it) and could once again cash out and sit in a money market for the rest of the year. But I don't expect to do that, since I prefer to be invested than in cash. Profits can be made on the long side even in a poor market, even if shorting, with its higher risks, may be easier. So long as I continue to enjoy the challenge, and need to earn extra money, and it continues to work for me, I will pursue my style of investing but not share my stock picks. Tom Worley stkguru@netside.net AIM: TexWorley - ----- Original Message ----- From: Katherine Malm To: canslim@lists.xmission.com Sent: Sunday, February 24, 2002 7:10 PM Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2002 15:11:27 -0500 Hi Duke, I believe that what you are suggesting is something that already goes on quite frequently on the list. That is, people share their read on a stock from both fundamental and technical perspectives. These "examples" as you call them are instructive and I agree with you on that count. I have 3 binders full of "lessons" that I've acquired over the years from others, from my own observations/successes/failures, from the IBD, from 2 of the advanced IBD seminars and from this list. But I still won't submit a stock and say "you should buy this because xyz." While I am looking to enter a trade or while I am in the trade I really don't want to attract *more* eyes to the stock. I would prefer that we accomplish what you are suggesting by doing post analysis instead. And honestly, why should I submit the conclusions of all my hard work in stock selection so that others (especially non-contributors) can make money? I'll gladly share knowledge and take on a debate so as to learn something, but I won't share stock picks. I'm sure there are others who feel the same but are less willing to admit it publicly. Katherine - ----- Original Message ----- From: Duke Miller To: canslim@lists.xmission.com Sent: Sunday, February 24, 2002 5:50 PM Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2002 15:11:27 -0500 Katherine: I understand TOTALLY your opinion; I joined this list for many of the same reasons you did. But...your rationale for joining this list only SUPPORTS my concept. What better way to become adept and expand your horizons regarding CANSLIM than with real life, actual examples, I.e., our LIMITED submissions of potential CANSLIM stocks (not "stock picks") for the Mother List? Have you been to a CANSLIM seminar? I don't know about you, but 90% of my takeaway is in the form of actual charts illustrating real life situations with notes as to the discussions. I see a lot of that in the Mother list: Forcing "members" to justify their picks before they make this list has immense educational potential. In other words, don't tell us you think this is a good pick....tell us WHY! So, my intent is NOT to have the concept become a list of stock picks. Rather, a list of stocks that students of CANSLIM are dxxn near willing to fight for; stocks they don't want to see removed from the list for this reason or that; stocks they (and all others) can potentially make money on. My wording about "CANSLIM this and CANSLIM that" was poorly chosen. I didn't mean to imply boredom. But if all that CANSLIM this and CANSLIM that is backed up by actual real life, this is my money examples....won't it mean more? (Not to beat a dead horse, but did you see in the Sunday WSJ that Southwest Airlines is going to change their system. No more colored boarding cards. Even they are looking at the world a bit differently.) Debate on! Duke - -----Original Message----- From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of Katherine Malm Sent: Sunday, February 24, 2002 6:20 PM To: canslim@lists.xmission.com Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2002 15:11:27 -0500 Hi Duke, I've been mulling over your "mother of all lists" idea all day. I understand your desire to share "collective wisdom" regarding stock picks, but I don't agree with it, for the same reason you listed in your comment (b). Even more so, however, when I was reviewing archives in many communities in order to decide which list to join, one of the things I looked for was a community that hadn't reduced discussion of CANSLIM down to endless stock "picks" but instead a discussion of the underlying principles that make CANSLIM tick; processes for finding and evaluating stocks; clarifications of investing concepts; and practice in the interpretation of technicals, fundamentals, market health and CANSLIM guidelines. While some may argue that such discussion makes CANSLIM overly complex, I think this is precisely what makes this a community that helps to build knowledgeable CANSLIMers. In my mind, it is the exchange of ideas and viewpoints, not stock picks, which creates value. Southwest Airlines has had many copycat competitors over the years, attracted to the business by the notion that following Southwest's "simple" approach to flying was easy and repeatable. All of the early copycats' businesses failed because they did not understand the most important part of Southwest's strategy, i.e., that many dedicated people work exceptionally hard and utilize a complex systematic approach to doing business that *appears* to be simple to the customers who fly with them. Katherine - ----- Original Message ----- From: Duke Miller To: Canslim@Lists. Xmission. Com Sent: Sunday, February 24, 2002 2:12 PM Subject: [CANSLIM] Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2002 15:11:27 -0500 Being new to this list, I'd like to share a few observations and proffer a what-if. a) Working through this market, tugging constantly with my buy checklist, it helps to have company that's a) knowledgeable, b) successful (or committed to striving for it), and c) CERTAINLY unbiased! b) The debate herein over the merits of CANSLIM-this and/or CANSLIM-that is unending (as it should be). The arguments haven't changed since the concept was developed. NO matter how hard we try to stay between the lines, we each have our own variation(s), don't we? c) It seems we're all watch-listing and waiting, ever confident the market's going to eventually break out ONLY when it's ready to. I agree with Katherine, that we can certainly "mine" some winners these days. I've got two that are showing promise, buy a dozen more I've been "whipsawed" out of. (One thing WON taught me is not to "hide" from my blunders, rather study and learn from them. I still hate doing that!) I think you'll all agree, trying to unearth the one stock in four that doesn't shake us out unmercifully in this market we're in is not fun. So here's a what if from the glistening Gulf shores of Anna Maria Island: Is it conceivable we might better devote our time to channeling our collective energies toward building "all-star" watch list? One that, when the M does turn, we can be ready in the wings? Forgive me if the thought isn't totally developed yet (or original to this group), but what if...those interested "sign up" to each "nominate" one, two, or three personal-favorite watch stocks. Ones you'd buy for your own mother! (The "mother" of all lists???) And we take that list, follow its contents' progress together and, on-going, "debate" the merits of each "nomination," old or new. Just today we got lists from Tim and John; I wonder which three from each list they'd nominate for the Mother List? IMHO, this: a) would help us expand and refine our own lists; b) steepen our CANSLIM learning curves via the debates; c) benefit all of us when the tide(s) turn; and c), would be a source for a little fun (while we wait for M)! If there's enough interest, I'll be glad to suggest a nomination checklist which we can improvise as we go along, etc, etc, etc. So what do you think? A final note: I'm out of town until Thursday, but will be monitoring as best I can from my remote hotmail account, iffy at best. Worst case scenario, I'll compile a wrap-up of your input by week's end. Duke - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email " majordomo@xmission.com " - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. - ------_=_NextPart_001_01C1BE05.94E98390 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1"
Katherine,
 
With all due respect, what harm would be done to your portfolio by revealing what stocks you are looking to buy/short - or at least what stocks you just bought/shorted? 
 
John C.
-----Original Message-----
From: Katherine Malm [mailto:kmalm@earthlink.net]
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 8:54 AM
To: canslim@lists.xmission.com
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2002 15:11:27 -0500

Morning, Tom.
 
It was a funny thing admitting those feelings to the list as I don't think I had even admitted it to myself in quite those words. But the truth is, I'll go out of my way to help absolutely anybody, share what I know so that others can become better investors, and ask plenty of questions and listen in order to learn from others and become a better investor myself.  But by golly....when it comes to my money and the issue of privacy....I look at it very differently. There are only of couple of things I *won't* do....discuss specifics on performance, tell people what stocks I'm looking to buy/short, or reveal the positions I'm currently in. Short list, but that's just part of the guidelines I've set.
 
I can't say I'm all that thrilled about the list turning into some big "collective mining effort," but Duke's a sport for bringing it up and I admire his in-your-face attitude about getting the effort underway as there *are* list members who will benefit.
 
Have a great day,
Katherine
----- Original Message -----
From: Tom Worley
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 5:36 AM
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2002 15:11:27 -0500

Katherine, I am quite willing to admit the same thing, I put a huge amount of work into my investing, and intend that I benefit from it. My style is strictly my own, and I have found that since I gave up handling retail clients that I make far better decisions for myself without the responsibility for others. I am sure many members must have thought I was insane a few weeks ago when I mentioned that I not only fully invested my cash acct, but went to the full margin limits as well. Despite a very dismal "M" since then, I am up over 13% (and yeah, for the doubters I can prove it) and could once again cash out and sit in a money market for the rest of the year. But I don't expect to do that, since I prefer to be invested than in cash.
 
Profits can be made on the long side even in a poor market, even if shorting, with its higher risks, may be easier. So long as I continue to enjoy the challenge, and need to earn extra money, and it continues to work for me, I will pursue my style of investing but not share my stock picks.
 
Tom Worley
stkguru@netside.net
AIM: TexWorley
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, February 24, 2002 7:10 PM
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2002 15:11:27 -0500

Hi Duke,
 
I believe that what you are suggesting is something that already goes on quite frequently on the list. That is, people share their read on a stock from both fundamental and technical perspectives. These "examples" as you call them are instructive and I agree with you on that count. I have 3 binders full of "lessons" that I've acquired over the years from others, from my own observations/successes/failures, from the IBD, from 2 of the advanced IBD seminars and from this list. But I still won't submit a stock and say "you should buy this because xyz." While I am looking to enter a trade or while I am in the trade I really don't want to attract *more* eyes to the stock. I would prefer that we accomplish what you are suggesting by doing post analysis instead. And honestly, why should I submit the conclusions of all my hard work in stock selection so that others (especially non-contributors) can make money? I'll gladly share knowledge and take on a debate so as to learn something,  but I won't share stock picks. I'm sure there are others who feel the same but are less willing to admit it publicly.
 
Katherine
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, February 24, 2002 5:50 PM
Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2002 15:11:27 -0500

Katherine:
 
I understand TOTALLY your opinion; I joined this list for many of the same reasons you did. 
 
But...your rationale for joining this list only SUPPORTS my concept.  What better way to become adept and expand your horizons regarding CANSLIM than with real life, actual examples, I.e., our LIMITED submissions of potential CANSLIM stocks (not "stock picks") for the Mother List? 
 
Have you been to a CANSLIM seminar?   I don't know about you, but 90% of my takeaway is in the form of actual charts illustrating real life situations with notes as to the discussions.  I see a lot of that in the Mother list:  Forcing "members" to justify their picks before they make this list has immense educational potential.  In other words, don't tell us you think this is a good pick....tell us WHY!
 
So, my intent is NOT to have the concept become a list of stock picks.  Rather, a list of stocks that students of CANSLIM are dxxn near willing to fight for; stocks they don't want to see removed from the list for this reason or that; stocks they (and all others) can potentially make money on.  My wording about "CANSLIM this and CANSLIM that" was poorly chosen.  I didn't mean to imply boredom.  But if all that CANSLIM this and CANSLIM that is backed up by actual real life, this is my money examples....won't it mean more?
 
(Not to beat a dead horse, but did you see in the Sunday WSJ that Southwest Airlines is going to change their system.  No more colored boarding cards.  Even they are looking at the world a bit differently.)
 
Debate on!
 
Duke
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of Katherine Malm
Sent: Sunday, February 24, 2002 6:20 PM
To: canslim@lists.xmission.com
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2002 15:11:27 -0500

Hi Duke,
 
I've been mulling over your "mother of all lists" idea all day. I understand your desire to share "collective wisdom" regarding stock picks, but I don't agree with it, for the same reason you listed in your comment (b). Even more so, however, when I was reviewing archives in many communities in order to decide which list to join, one of the things I looked for was a community that hadn't reduced discussion of CANSLIM down to endless stock "picks" but instead a discussion of the underlying principles that make CANSLIM tick; processes for finding and evaluating stocks; clarifications of investing concepts; and practice in the interpretation of technicals, fundamentals, market health and CANSLIM guidelines. While some may argue that such discussion makes CANSLIM overly complex, I think this is precisely what makes this a community that helps to build knowledgeable CANSLIMers. In my mind, it is the exchange of ideas and viewpoints, not stock picks, which creates value.
 
Southwest Airlines has had many copycat competitors over the years, attracted to the business by the notion that following Southwest's "simple" approach to flying was easy and repeatable. All of the early copycats' businesses failed because they did not understand the most important part of Southwest's strategy, i.e., that many dedicated people work exceptionally hard and utilize a complex systematic approach to doing business that *appears* to be simple to the customers who fly with them.
 
Katherine
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, February 24, 2002 2:12 PM
Subject: [CANSLIM] Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2002 15:11:27 -0500

Being new to this list, I'd like to share a few observations and proffer a
what-if.

a)  Working through this market, tugging constantly with my buy checklist,
it helps to have company that's a) knowledgeable, b) successful (or
committed to striving for it), and c) CERTAINLY unbiased!

b)  The debate herein over the merits of CANSLIM-this and/or CANSLIM-that is
unending (as it should be).  The arguments haven't changed since the concept
was developed.  NO matter how hard we try to stay between the lines, we each
have our own variation(s), don't we?

c)  It seems we're all watch-listing and waiting, ever confident the
market's going to eventually break out ONLY when it's ready to. I agree with
Katherine, that we can certainly "mine" some winners these days.  I've got
two that are showing promise, buy a dozen more I've been "whipsawed" out of.
(One thing WON taught me is not to "hide" from my blunders, rather study and
learn from them.  I still hate doing that!)

I think you'll all agree, trying to unearth the one stock in four that
doesn't shake us out unmercifully in this market we're in is not fun.  So
here's a  what if from the glistening Gulf shores of Anna Maria Island:  Is
it conceivable we might better devote our time to channeling our collective
energies toward building "all-star" watch list?  One that, when the M does
turn, we can be ready in the wings?

Forgive me if the thought isn't totally developed yet (or original to this
group), but what if...those interested "sign up" to each "nominate" one,
two, or three personal-favorite watch stocks.  Ones you'd buy for your own
mother! (The "mother" of all lists???)   And we take that list, follow its
contents' progress together and, on-going, "debate" the merits of each
"nomination," old or new.

Just today we got lists from Tim and John;  I wonder which three from each
list they'd nominate for the Mother List?

IMHO, this: a) would help us expand and refine our own lists; b) steepen our
CANSLIM learning curves via the debates; c) benefit all of us when the
tide(s) turn; and c), would be a source for a little fun (while we wait for
M)!

If there's enough interest, I'll be glad to suggest a nomination checklist
which we can improvise as we go along, etc, etc, etc.  So what do you think?

A final note:  I'm out of town until Thursday, but will be monitoring as
best I can from my remote hotmail account, iffy at best.  Worst case
scenario, I'll compile a wrap-up of your input by week's end.

Duke





-
-To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
-In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
-"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.
- ------_=_NextPart_001_01C1BE05.94E98390-- - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2002 08:34:58 -0600 From: "Katherine Malm" Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2002 15:11:27 -0500 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. - ------=_NextPart_000_016C_01C1BDD7.4ED22DE0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Patrick and Andreas, You both make excellent points. Andreas, you have perhaps zeroed in on = my greatest fear...that the list will become a Yahoo wasteland of stock = lists and "egocentric virtual points." I should have given the members = more credit, as in the past it has never been the majority tone of the = list. Patrick, you are *so* right about the differences between = individuals and what they consider to be "private." Thanks to both of = you for your comments. Katherine ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Andreas Himmelreich=20 To: 'canslim@lists.xmission.com'=20 Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 8:21 AM Subject: AW: [CANSLIM] Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2002 15:11:27 -0500 Hi Katherine, I agree, I also do believe that the best part of a list like is to = exchange=20 knowledge on the method not on the outcome. Nevertheless some collective Mining has been done before, lots of = lists=20 have been posted. I have a look in these lists once in a while. If I = find=20 something nice, I ask my self, if the stock was on my screen as well if not why not. That might change my screen or add another screen. I just added a = micro cap=20 screen and I will program a flag for my database, which tells me which = microcap had a big volume surges. I might not even use the screen, but = it=20 adds another piece. What should be really avoided is hyping stocks or stocks lists and = guru=20 type of promoting and "ego discussions" where one individual is bashing the others favorites just for the sake of scoring = egocentric=20 virtual points. But I believe we all are going to keep that in check, I think the list = is=20 in great shape. Some stronger words, some irony here and there, but nothing serious = (Though=20 I am not that good at judging this, because its not my first = language),=20 thats the salt in the soupe. Best Regards Andreas Another Remark on the sidelines: Groups like this are much better in = the US=20 then they are in Germany. Compliment !!! Another Compliment: Salt Lake Olympics where great !!! Fantastic=20 Organization, German Athletes and visitors where really overwhelmed by = the=20 warm, friendly US People !!! Thank you USA!!! > -----Urspr=FCngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Katherine Malm [SMTP:kmalm@earthlink.net] > Gesendet am: Monday, February 25, 2002 2:54 PM > An: canslim@lists.xmission.com > Betreff: Re: [CANSLIM] Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2002 15:11:27 -0500 > > Morning, Tom. > > It was a funny thing admitting those feelings to the list as I don't = think I had even admitted it to myself in quite those words. But the = truth=20 is, I'll go out of my way to help absolutely anybody, share what I = know so=20 that others can become better investors, and ask plenty of questions = and=20 listen in order to learn from others and become a better investor = myself.=20 But by golly....when it comes to my money and the issue of = privacy....I=20 look at it very differently. There are only of couple of things I = *won't*=20 do....discuss specifics on performance, tell people what stocks I'm = looking=20 to buy/short, or reveal the positions I'm currently in. Short list, = but=20 that's just part of the guidelines I've set. > > I can't say I'm all that thrilled about the list turning into some = big=20 "collective mining effort," but Duke's a sport for bringing it up and = I=20 admire his in-your-face attitude about getting the effort underway as = there=20 *are* list members who will benefit. > > Have a great day, > Katherine > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Tom Worley > To: canslim@lists.xmission.com > Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 5:36 AM > Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2002 15:11:27 -0500 > > > Katherine, I am quite willing to admit the same thing, I put a = huge=20 amount of work into my investing, and intend that I benefit from it. = My=20 style is strictly my own, and I have found that since I gave up = handling=20 retail clients that I make far better decisions for myself without the = responsibility for others. I am sure many members must have thought I = was=20 insane a few weeks ago when I mentioned that I not only fully invested = my=20 cash acct, but went to the full margin limits as well. Despite a very=20 dismal "M" since then, I am up over 13% (and yeah, for the doubters I = can=20 prove it) and could once again cash out and sit in a money market for = the=20 rest of the year. But I don't expect to do that, since I prefer to be=20 invested than in cash. > > Profits can be made on the long side even in a poor market, even = if=20 shorting, with its higher risks, may be easier. So long as I continue = to=20 enjoy the challenge, and need to earn extra money, and it continues to = work=20 for me, I will pursue my style of investing but not share my stock = picks. > > Tom Worley > stkguru@netside.net > AIM: TexWorley > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Katherine Malm > To: canslim@lists.xmission.com > Sent: Sunday, February 24, 2002 7:10 PM > Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2002 15:11:27 -0500 > > > Hi Duke, > > I believe that what you are suggesting is something that already = goes=20 on quite frequently on the list. That is, people share their read on a = stock from both fundamental and technical perspectives. These = "examples" as=20 you call them are instructive and I agree with you on that count. I = have 3=20 binders full of "lessons" that I've acquired over the years from = others,=20 from my own observations/successes/failures, from the IBD, from 2 of = the=20 advanced IBD seminars and from this list. But I still won't submit a = stock=20 and say "you should buy this because xyz." While I am looking to enter = a=20 trade or while I am in the trade I really don't want to attract *more* = eyes=20 to the stock. I would prefer that we accomplish what you are = suggesting by=20 doing post analysis instead. And honestly, why should I submit the=20 conclusions of all my hard work in stock selection so that others=20 (especially non-contributors) can make money? I'll gladly share = knowledge=20 and take on a debate so as to learn something, but I won't share = stock=20 picks. I'm sure there are others who feel the same but are less = willing to=20 admit it publicly. > > Katherine > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Duke Miller > To: canslim@lists.xmission.com > Sent: Sunday, February 24, 2002 5:50 PM > Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2002 15:11:27 -0500 > > > Katherine: > > I understand TOTALLY your opinion; I joined this list for many = of=20 the same reasons you did. > > But...your rationale for joining this list only SUPPORTS my=20 concept. What better way to become adept and expand your horizons=20 regarding CANSLIM than with real life, actual examples, I.e., our = LIMITED=20 submissions of potential CANSLIM stocks (not "stock picks") for the = Mother=20 List? > > Have you been to a CANSLIM seminar? I don't know about you, = but=20 90% of my takeaway is in the form of actual charts illustrating real = life=20 situations with notes as to the discussions. I see a lot of that in = the=20 Mother list: Forcing "members" to justify their picks before they = make=20 this list has immense educational potential. In other words, don't = tell us=20 you think this is a good pick....tell us WHY! > > So, my intent is NOT to have the concept become a list of = stock=20 picks. Rather, a list of stocks that students of CANSLIM are dxxn = near=20 willing to fight for; stocks they don't want to see removed from the = list=20 for this reason or that; stocks they (and all others) can potentially = make=20 money on. My wording about "CANSLIM this and CANSLIM that" was poorly = chosen. I didn't mean to imply boredom. But if all that CANSLIM this = and=20 CANSLIM that is backed up by actual real life, this is my money = examples =20 ....won't it mean more? > > (Not to beat a dead horse, but did you see in the Sunday WSJ = that=20 Southwest Airlines is going to change their system. No more colored=20 boarding cards. Even they are looking at the world a bit = differently.) > > Debate on! > > Duke > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com=20 [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of Katherine Malm > Sent: Sunday, February 24, 2002 6:20 PM > To: canslim@lists.xmission.com > Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2002 15:11:27 -0500 > > > Hi Duke, > > I've been mulling over your "mother of all lists" idea all = day. I=20 understand your desire to share "collective wisdom" regarding stock = picks,=20 but I don't agree with it, for the same reason you listed in your = comment=20 (b). Even more so, however, when I was reviewing archives in many=20 communities in order to decide which list to join, one of the things I = looked for was a community that hadn't reduced discussion of CANSLIM = down=20 to endless stock "picks" but instead a discussion of the underlying=20 principles that make CANSLIM tick; processes for finding and = evaluating=20 stocks; clarifications of investing concepts; and practice in the=20 interpretation of technicals, fundamentals, market health and CANSLIM=20 guidelines. While some may argue that such discussion makes CANSLIM = overly=20 complex, I think this is precisely what makes this a community that = helps=20 to build knowledgeable CANSLIMers. In my mind, it is the exchange of = ideas=20 and viewpoints, not stock picks, which creates value. > > Southwest Airlines has had many copycat competitors over the = years, attracted to the business by the notion that following = Southwest's=20 "simple" approach to flying was easy and repeatable. All of the early=20 copycats' businesses failed because they did not understand the most=20 important part of Southwest's strategy, i.e., that many dedicated = people=20 work exceptionally hard and utilize a complex systematic approach to = doing=20 business that *appears* to be simple to the customers who fly with = them. > > Katherine > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Duke Miller > To: Canslim@Lists. Xmission. Com > Sent: Sunday, February 24, 2002 2:12 PM > Subject: [CANSLIM] Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2002 15:11:27 -0500 > > > Being new to this list, I'd like to share a few = observations=20 and proffer a > what-if. > > a) Working through this market, tugging constantly with = my buy=20 checklist, > it helps to have company that's a) knowledgeable, b) = successful=20 (or > committed to striving for it), and c) CERTAINLY unbiased! > > b) The debate herein over the merits of CANSLIM-this = and/or=20 CANSLIM-that is > unending (as it should be). The arguments haven't changed = since the concept > was developed. NO matter how hard we try to stay between = the=20 lines, we each > have our own variation(s), don't we? > > c) It seems we're all watch-listing and waiting, ever=20 confident the > market's going to eventually break out ONLY when it's = ready to.=20 I agree with > Katherine, that we can certainly "mine" some winners these = days. I've got > two that are showing promise, buy a dozen more I've been=20 "whipsawed" out of. > (One thing WON taught me is not to "hide" from my = blunders,=20 rather study and > learn from them. I still hate doing that!) > > I think you'll all agree, trying to unearth the one stock = in=20 four that > doesn't shake us out unmercifully in this market we're in = is=20 not fun. So > here's a what if from the glistening Gulf shores of Anna = Maria=20 Island: Is > it conceivable we might better devote our time to = channeling=20 our collective > energies toward building "all-star" watch list? One that, = when=20 the M does > turn, we can be ready in the wings? > > Forgive me if the thought isn't totally developed yet (or=20 original to this > group), but what if...those interested "sign up" to each=20 "nominate" one, > two, or three personal-favorite watch stocks. Ones you'd = buy=20 for your own > mother! (The "mother" of all lists???) And we take that = list,=20 follow its > contents' progress together and, on-going, "debate" the = merits=20 of each > "nomination," old or new. > > Just today we got lists from Tim and John; I wonder which = three from each > list they'd nominate for the Mother List? > > IMHO, this: a) would help us expand and refine our own = lists;=20 b) steepen our > CANSLIM learning curves via the debates; c) benefit all of = us=20 when the > tide(s) turn; and c), would be a source for a little fun = (while=20 we wait for > M)! > > If there's enough interest, I'll be glad to suggest a=20 nomination checklist > which we can improvise as we go along, etc, etc, etc. So = what=20 do you think? > > A final note: I'm out of town until Thursday, but will be = monitoring as > best I can from my remote hotmail account, iffy at best. = Worst=20 case > scenario, I'll compile a wrap-up of your input by week's = end. > > Duke > > > > > > - > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. > << Datei: ATT00015.htm >>=20 - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. - ------=_NextPart_000_016C_01C1BDD7.4ED22DE0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Patrick and Andreas,
 
You both make excellent points. Andreas, you have perhaps zeroed in = on my=20 greatest fear...that the list will become a Yahoo wasteland of stock = lists and=20 "egocentric virtual points." I should have given the members more = credit, as in=20 the past it has never been the majority tone of the list. Patrick, = you are=20 *so* right about the differences between individuals and what they = consider to=20 be "private." Thanks to both of you for your comments.
 
Katherine
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Andreas = Himmelreich
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 = 8:21=20 AM
Subject: AW: [CANSLIM] Date: = Sun, 24 Feb=20 2002 15:11:27 -0500

Hi Katherine,

I agree, I also do believe that = the best=20 part of a list like is to exchange
knowledge on the method not on = the=20 outcome.
Nevertheless some collective Mining has been done before, = lots of=20 lists
have been posted. I have a look in these lists once in a = while. If I=20 find
something nice,

I ask my self, if the stock was on my = screen=20 as well if not why not.
That might change my screen or add another = screen.=20 I just added a micro cap
screen and I will program a flag for my = database,=20 which tells me which
microcap had a big volume surges. I might not = even=20 use the screen, but it
adds another piece.

What should be = really=20 avoided is hyping stocks or stocks lists and guru
type of = promoting and=20 "ego discussions" where one individual
is bashing the others = favorites just=20 for the sake of scoring egocentric
virtual points.

But I = believe we=20 all are going to keep that in check, I think the list is
in great=20 shape.
Some stronger words, some irony here and there, but nothing = serious=20 (Though
I am not that good at judging this, because its not my = first=20 language),
thats the salt in the soupe.

Best=20 Regards

Andreas

Another Remark on the sidelines: Groups = like=20 this are much better in the US
then they are in Germany. = Compliment=20 !!!
Another Compliment: Salt Lake Olympics where great !!! = Fantastic=20
Organization, German Athletes and visitors where really = overwhelmed by the=20
warm, friendly US People !!! Thank you USA!!!


>=20 -----Urspr=FCngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Katherine Malm=20 [SMTP:kmalm@earthlink.net]
> Gesendet am: Monday, February 25, = 2002 2:54=20 PM
> An: canslim@lists.xmission.com=
>=20 Betreff: Re: [CANSLIM] Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2002 15:11:27 = - -0500
>
>=20 Morning, Tom.
>
> It was a funny thing admitting those = feelings to=20 the list as I don't
think I had even admitted it to myself in = quite those=20 words. But the truth
is, I'll go out of my way to help absolutely = anybody,=20 share what I know so
that others can become better investors, and = ask=20 plenty of questions and
listen in order to learn from others and = become a=20 better investor myself.
 But by golly....when it comes to my = money=20 and the issue of privacy....I
look at it very differently. There = are only=20 of couple of things I *won't*
do....discuss specifics on = performance, tell=20 people what stocks I'm looking
to buy/short, or reveal the = positions I'm=20 currently in. Short list, but
that's just part of the guidelines = I've=20 set.
>
> I can't say I'm all that thrilled about the list = turning=20 into some big
"collective mining effort," but Duke's a sport for = bringing=20 it up and I
admire his in-your-face attitude about getting the = effort=20 underway as there
*are* list members who will = benefit.
>
>=20 Have a great day,
> Katherine
>   ----- Original = Message=20 -----
>   From: Tom Worley
>   To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=
>  =20 Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 5:36 AM
>   Subject: = Re:=20 [CANSLIM] Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2002 15:11:27=20 -0500
>
>
>   Katherine, I am quite = willing to=20 admit the same thing, I put a huge
amount of work into my = investing, and=20 intend that I benefit from it. My
style is strictly my own, and I = have=20 found that since I gave up handling
retail clients that I make far = better=20 decisions for myself without the
responsibility for others. I am = sure many=20 members must have thought I was
insane a few weeks ago when I = mentioned=20 that I not only fully invested my
cash acct, but went to the full = margin=20 limits as well. Despite a very
dismal "M" since then, I am up over = 13%=20 (and yeah, for the doubters I can
prove it) and could once again = cash out=20 and sit in a money market for the
rest of the year. But I don't = expect to=20 do that, since I prefer to be
invested than in=20 cash.
>
>   Profits can be made on the long side = even in=20 a poor market, even if
shorting, with its higher risks, may be = easier. So=20 long as I continue to
enjoy the challenge, and need to earn extra = money,=20 and it continues to work
for me, I will pursue my style of = investing but=20 not share my stock picks.
>
>   Tom=20 Worley
>   stkguru@netside.net
> =  =20 AIM: TexWorley
>     ----- Original Message=20 -----
>     From: Katherine=20 Malm
>     To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=
>    =20 Sent: Sunday, February 24, 2002 7:10 = PM
>    =20 Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2002 15:11:27=20 -0500
>
>
>     Hi=20 Duke,
>
>     I believe that what you = are=20 suggesting is something that already goes
on quite frequently on = the list.=20 That is, people share their read on a
stock from both fundamental = and=20 technical perspectives. These "examples" as
you call them are = instructive=20 and I agree with you on that count. I have 3
binders full of = "lessons"=20 that I've acquired over the years from others,
from my own=20 observations/successes/failures, from the IBD, from 2 of the =
advanced IBD=20 seminars and from this list. But I still won't submit a stock
and = say "you=20 should buy this because xyz." While I am looking to enter a
trade = or while=20 I am in the trade I really don't want to attract *more* eyes
to = the stock.=20 I would prefer that we accomplish what you are suggesting by
doing = post=20 analysis instead. And honestly, why should I submit the =
conclusions of all=20 my hard work in stock selection so that others
(especially=20 non-contributors) can make money? I'll gladly share knowledge
and = take on=20 a debate so as to learn something,  but I won't share stock =
picks.=20 I'm sure there are others who feel the same but are less willing to =
admit=20 it publicly.
>
>    =20 Katherine
>       ----- Original = Message=20 -----
>       From: Duke=20 Miller
>       To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=
>      =20 Sent: Sunday, February 24, 2002 5:50=20 PM
>       Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] = Date:=20 Sun, 24 Feb 2002 15:11:27=20 -0500
>
>
>      =20 Katherine:
>
>       I = understand=20 TOTALLY your opinion; I joined this list for many of
the same = reasons you=20 did.
>
>       But...your = rationale=20 for joining this list only SUPPORTS my
concept.  What better = way to=20 become adept and expand your horizons
regarding CANSLIM than with = real=20 life, actual examples, I.e., our LIMITED
submissions of potential = CANSLIM=20 stocks (not "stock picks") for the Mother=20
List?
>
>       Have you = been to=20 a CANSLIM seminar?   I don't know about you, but
90% of = my=20 takeaway is in the form of actual charts illustrating real life =
situations=20 with notes as to the discussions.  I see a lot of that in the =
Mother=20 list:  Forcing "members" to justify their picks before they make =
this=20 list has immense educational potential.  In other words, don't = tell us=20
you think this is a good pick....tell us=20 WHY!
>
>       So, my intent = is NOT=20 to have the concept become a list of stock
picks.  Rather, a = list of=20 stocks that students of CANSLIM are dxxn near
willing to fight = for; stocks=20 they don't want to see removed from the list
for this reason or = that;=20 stocks they (and all others) can potentially make
money on.  = My=20 wording about "CANSLIM this and CANSLIM that" was poorly =
chosen.  I=20 didn't mean to imply boredom.  But if all that CANSLIM this and=20
CANSLIM that is backed up by actual real life, this is my money=20 examples 
....won't it mean=20 more?
>
>       (Not to beat = a dead=20 horse, but did you see in the Sunday WSJ that
Southwest Airlines = is going=20 to change their system.  No more colored
boarding = cards.  Even=20 they are looking at the world a bit=20 differently.)
>
>       = Debate=20 on!
>
>      =20 Duke
>         = - -----Original=20 Message-----
>         = From: owner-canslim@lists.xmis= sion.com=20
[mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of Katherine=20 Malm
>         Sent: = Sunday,=20 February 24, 2002 6:20=20 PM
>         To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=
>        =20 Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2002 15:11:27=20 = - -0500
>
>
>       &n= bsp;=20 Hi = Duke,
>
>         = I've=20 been mulling over your "mother of all lists" idea all day. I =
understand=20 your desire to share "collective wisdom" regarding stock picks, =
but I=20 don't agree with it, for the same reason you listed in your comment =
(b).=20 Even more so, however, when I was reviewing archives in many =
communities=20 in order to decide which list to join, one of the things I
looked = for was=20 a community that hadn't reduced discussion of CANSLIM down
to = endless=20 stock "picks" but instead a discussion of the underlying =
principles that=20 make CANSLIM tick; processes for finding and evaluating
stocks;=20 clarifications of investing concepts; and practice in the =
interpretation=20 of technicals, fundamentals, market health and CANSLIM
guidelines. = While=20 some may argue that such discussion makes CANSLIM overly
complex, = I think=20 this is precisely what makes this a community that helps
to build=20 knowledgeable CANSLIMers. In my mind, it is the exchange of ideas =
and=20 viewpoints, not stock picks, which creates=20 value.
>
>         = Southwest Airlines has had many copycat competitors over the =
years,=20 attracted to the business by the notion that following Southwest's=20
"simple" approach to flying was easy and repeatable. All of the = early=20
copycats' businesses failed because they did not understand the = most=20
important part of Southwest's strategy, i.e., that many dedicated = people=20
work exceptionally hard and utilize a complex systematic approach = to doing=20
business that *appears* to be simple to the customers who fly with = them.
>
>        =20 = Katherine
>
>        = =20 ----- Original Message=20 = - -----
>          = =20 From: Duke=20 = Miller
>          = ; To:=20 Canslim@Lists. Xmission.=20 = Com
>           = Sent:=20 Sunday, February 24, 2002 2:12=20 PM
>           = Subject: [CANSLIM] Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2002 15:11:27=20 = - -0500
>
>
>       &n= bsp;  =20 Being new to this list, I'd like to share a few observations
and = proffer=20 a
>          =20 = what-if.
>
>        &= nbsp; =20 a)  Working through this market, tugging constantly with my buy=20 =
checklist,
>        &nb= sp; =20 it helps to have company that's a) knowledgeable, b) successful=20 =
(or
>         &nbs= p;=20 committed to striving for it), and c) CERTAINLY=20 = unbiased!
>
>        =   =20 b)  The debate herein over the merits of CANSLIM-this and/or=20
CANSLIM-that=20 is
>           = unending (as it should be).  The arguments haven't changed =
since the=20 = concept
>         &nbs= p;=20 was developed.  NO matter how hard we try to stay between the =
lines,=20 we = each
>           = have our own variation(s), don't=20 = we?
>
>         =  =20 c)  It seems we're all watch-listing and waiting, ever =
confident=20 = the
>          =20 market's going to eventually break out ONLY when it's ready to.
I = agree=20 = with
>           = Katherine, that we can certainly "mine" some winners these =
days. =20 I've = got
>          =20 two that are showing promise, buy a dozen more I've been =
"whipsawed" out=20 = of.
>           = (One=20 thing WON taught me is not to "hide" from my blunders,
rather = study=20 = and
>           = learn=20 from them.  I still hate doing=20 = that!)
>
>        &nb= sp; =20 I think you'll all agree, trying to unearth the one stock in
four=20 = that
>           = doesn't shake us out unmercifully in this market we're in is
not=20 fun. =20 So
>           = here's=20 a  what if from the glistening Gulf shores of Anna Maria=20
Island: =20 Is
>           = it=20 conceivable we might better devote our time to channeling
our=20 = collective
>         &= nbsp;=20 energies toward building "all-star" watch list?  One that, when =
the M=20 = does
>           = turn,=20 we can be ready in the=20 = wings?
>
>        &nb= sp; =20 Forgive me if the thought isn't totally developed yet (or
original = to=20 = this
>           = group), but what if...those interested "sign up" to each =
"nominate"=20 = one,
>           = two,=20 or three personal-favorite watch stocks.  Ones you'd buy
for = your=20 = own
>          =20 mother! (The "mother" of all lists???)   And we take that = list,=20
follow=20 = its
>          =20 contents' progress together and, on-going, "debate" the merits
of=20 = each
>           = "nomination," old or=20 = new.
>
>         = ; =20 Just today we got lists from Tim and John;  I wonder which =
three from=20 = each
>           = list=20 they'd nominate for the Mother=20 = List?
>
>        &nbs= p; =20 IMHO, this: a) would help us expand and refine our own lists;
b) = steepen=20 = our
>          =20 CANSLIM learning curves via the debates; c) benefit all of us
when = = the
>          =20 tide(s) turn; and c), would be a source for a little fun (while
we = wait=20 = for
>          =20 = M)!
>
>         =  =20 If there's enough interest, I'll be glad to suggest a
nomination=20 = checklist
>         &n= bsp;=20 which we can improvise as we go along, etc, etc, etc.  So what =
do you=20 = think?
>
>        &nb= sp; =20 A final note:  I'm out of town until Thursday, but will be =
monitoring=20 as
>           = best I=20 can from my remote hotmail account, iffy at best.  Worst=20 =
case
>         &nb= sp;=20 scenario, I'll compile a wrap-up of your input by week's=20 = end.
>
>         = ; =20 = Duke
>
>
>
>
>
>   &nb= sp;      =20 -
>           = - -To=20 subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
>= ;          =20 -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim"=20 or
>           = -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your = email.
> =20 << Datei: ATT00015.htm >>

-
-To = subscribe/unsubscribe,=20 email "majordomo@xmission.com"
-In= the=20 email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
-"unsubscribe = canslim".  Do=20 not use quotes in your email.
- ------=_NextPart_000_016C_01C1BDD7.4ED22DE0-- - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ End of canslim-digest V2 #2163 ****************************** To unsubscribe to canslim-digest, send an email to "majordomo@xmission.com" with "unsubscribe canslim-digest" in the body of the message. For information on digests or retrieving files and old messages send "help" to the same address. Do not use quotes in your message.