From: owner-canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com (canslim-digest)
To: canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com
Subject: canslim-digest V2 #2195
Reply-To: canslim
Sender: owner-canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com
Errors-To: owner-canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com
Precedence: bulk
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-No-Archive: yes
canslim-digest Tuesday, March 12 2002 Volume 02 : Number 2195
In this issue:
Stocks
RE: [CANSLIM] Pick list game (well my own)
Re: [CANSLIM] Pick list game (well my own)
[CANSLIM] Microcap Question
RE: UOPX (was: [CANSLIM] VectorVest fundies)
RE: UOPX (was: [CANSLIM] VectorVest fundies)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2001 21:34:10 -0800
From: StockReports732111@msn.com
Subject: Stocks

|
Nurotech
Development Corporation (OTCBB: NURO)
Current Price: $0.178
Shares Outstanding: 117M
Public Float: 81M
Average Daily Volume: 417K
Chart
for NURO ( Chart via PCQuote)
Corporate Profile
Neurotech Development
Corporation is an international, single-source designer, developer and
builder of pre-engineered, rapid deployment hospitals, medical
clinics, and health care facilities. Neurotech provides
requisite primary health care products and services to its client
countries. The development and operation of these facilities are
supported by the Company's "Neurotech HealthCare System©".
Internet and proprietary Intranet
architecture provide global medical and health care connectivity.
Neurotech's current backlog is $1,514,000,000 for health care
facilities, schools and services from two principal client countries,
China and Indonesia.
USA standards of medical
technology, diagnostics, physician and health care personnel training,
computers, telephony, and resource management software systems provide
turn-key health care facilities that meet and exceed Neurotech's
client countries', national health care requirements. Client
countries' health care personnel are trained at USA based medical
teaching universities in diagnostics, health care management, and
facilities operation and administration. When training is complete,
client countries' heath care personnel are qualified to manage and
operate Neurotech's "turn-key" medical facilities.
China:
According to new strategic research (F&S
Report) conducted by Frost
& Sullivan, "Chinese Diagnostic Product Markets"...
"the Chinese market is expected to grow at a compound
annual rate of 16.3% from 1999 through 2005. The vast Chinese
population, a large portion of which is aging, will spur demand for
diagnostic products". The Frost & Sullivan report adds,
"the establishment of new hospitals and nursing homes catering to
the growing health care needs of the Chinese, will further
this demand. Health care reforms will bolster market…Chinese
health care reform programs will establish more hospitals and nursing
homes ".
Chinese leaders must
deal with a rising gray tide, states that, “some 126 million
Chinese, or one out of 10 people, are aged 60 or older (largest
elderly population in the world). By 2030, caring for a
projected 300 million elderly could consume 10% of China’s national
income. Policies are being drafted to encourage growth of a
geriatric care industry.” Neurotech Development’s
$30,000,000 USD dollar geriatric facility, under contract in Southern
Guandong, cited in the article, portends enormous supply opportunities
for the Company in this health care, market segment.
The Neurotech
HealthCare System©
Neurotech Development
completed final development of its proprietary rapid deployment
managed health care system after four years of prototyping, modeling,
and successful operational trials. The Company's production ready,
proprietary System through computers and telephony, will link client
countries' health care facilities with USA and other internationally
based hospitals, universities, medical research institutions, medical
organizations, physician referral services, medical journals and
libraries, laboratories, professional medical and business societies,
associations, institutes and organizations, providing global Internet
and Intranet connectivity.
Year 2001 Building &
Development
For
latest developments, please refer to the Neurotech Development
Corporation Asia News Update page.
Indonesia: The
company currently holds $100,000,000 in bank guarantees from its
clients in Indonesia. Current economic instability of the
financial institutions and government may prevent the company from
starting the planned construction of these facilities in October 2001
upon maturity of the bank guarantees. The company will closely monitor
the situation, and communications remain close. Geological and
site analysis for five hospitals have been completed. The Company
intends to build and complete six hospitals once construction begins.
China: The Company
has orders for hospitals and health care facilities totaling USD
$635,000,000. Construction of Neurotech health care facilities is
scheduled to start in November of 2000. Neurotech estimates this
project's completion sometime in late 2003.
Investment, Acquisitions
and Business Development
Neurotech has acquired 12.5%
of American International Medical Resources, Inc. (AIM), and intends
to complete the acquisition, which includes Residential Health Care,
Inc. (RHC).
Residential Health Care
provides health care containment services offering utilization review,
pre-certification, concurrent review, retro-review, discharge
planning, and large case management to approximately 200 customers.
RHC's customers are insurance companies, third party administrators,
self-insured employers, and other health care purchasing groups.
Connected to RHC are 300,000 USA Physicians/MD's, 3600 acute care
hospitals, and 22,600 ancillary service facilities, including medical
research, universities and interconnected supporting medical record
and information databases.
When the acquisition
of AIM is completed, and AIM completes the RHC acquisition, Neurotech
will incorporate AIM's/RHC's databases, customers, vendors, and other
associated product and service providers into its Neurotech HealthCare
System©.
Neurotech will leverage this core base to develop and expand its
products and services offerings.
Doctors4Doctors.net:
Neurotech which owns the "Doctors4Doctors.net"
and "Doctors4Doctors.org"
domain names is developing an Internet and Intranet portal that will
provide the electronic architecture for its USA based and overseas
Physicians' connectivity to the "Neurotech HealthCare System©".
Physicians and health care professionals, practicing in
industrializing and developing countries, that have been
geographically and technologically limited in improving their health
care practices and modalities, will now be able to significantly
advance their standards utilizing the Doctors4Doctors.net©
on-line tele-medicine services providing on-line video conferencing,
supplies and equipment, diagnostics, physician referrals,
pharmacological data and information, surgical procedure training,
disease research, treatment case studies, and continuing education
courses.
Neurotech Development
Corporation expects the intended combination of AIM and
Doctors4Doctors will produce significant, increasing, recurring
revenues.
On-line Investor Resources
Market
Guide - Snapshot for Neurotech Development Corporation
Ziff
Davis Net Inter@ctive Investor
FreeEdgar
Filings
Other Sources: Vertical
Capital Partners Inc. Neurotech Report
News
Releases ( From Yahoo Finance)
Certain statements in this
Corporate Profile constitute forward-looking statements within the
meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such
forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risk,
uncertainties and other factors that may cause actual results to
differ materially from the anticipated results, performance, of
achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements.
Such factors include but are not limited to changing economic
conditions, changes in government regulations and budgets, language
and translation, issuance of permits, import licenses, work visas,
education visas, availability of class positions, changing economic
conditions, competition as well as commercial and political risks.
Important Disclosure
OTC Opportunity News and its "Report" are
not a registered investment advisor, a broker-dealer and/or a broker.
All statements and expressions are strictly the opinions of OTC
Opportunity News, the statements and expressions made are not meant to
be a solicitation to buy or sell securities. We at OTC Opportunity News
believe all sources of information to be reliable but make no
representation or guarantee to the accuracy of the information provided.
The information that OTC Opportunity News relies on is, generally
provided by the company featured and will also use every attempt
possible to include all information available from outside sources.
Investors should not only rely solely on the information contained in
this publication. Rather investors should use the information provided
as a starting point for doing additional research to form his or her
opinions. Understand that trading or investing in any securities
involves a high degree of risk and use of the information provided is at
the investor’s sole risk. Know your risk limitations. OTC Opportunity
News and its publishers are not liable for any losses, damage’s,
monetary or otherwise, that may occur due to the content of OTC
Opportunity News or its Report. The matters in this report contain
forward looking statements, as defined in section 27(A) of the
securities act of 1933 and section 21(E) of the security exchange act of
1934 as amended. OTC Opportunity News may act as a consultant to these
companies reviewed in this publication. Investors should be made aware
that companies featured might pay consideration to OTC Opportunity News
and/or it shareholders.OTC Opportunity News editor or affiliate, agents
and/or family. OTC Opportunity News expects to receive two thousand
dollars in cash from L.B. Internet Consulting. for services rendered to
the company profiled in this publication. OTC Opportunity News may
acquire a position in the company herein profiled. Some of the shares
acquired may have been acquired prior to the dissemination of this
report and OTC Opportunity News may increase or decrease these positions
at any time.
|
Unsubscribe
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 09:37:15 -0500
From: "Duke Miller"
Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] Pick list game (well my own)
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
- ------=_NextPart_000_001D_01C1C9A9.7EED4720
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Janis:
This isn't the list. Should I put you down as a participant? We'll start
the list next week.
Duke
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com
[mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of BIKEAR@aol.com
Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 10:43 PM
To: canslim@lists.xmission.com
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Pick list game (well my own)
I like this idea...many of the stocks on the list do not have the criteria
that I am looking for.........janis...
- ------=_NextPart_000_001D_01C1C9A9.7EED4720
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Janis:
This isn't the =
list. =20
Should I put you down as a participant? We'll start the list =
next=20
week.
Duke
I like=20
this idea...many of the stocks on the list do not have the criteria =
that I am=20
looking for.........janis...
- ------=_NextPart_000_001D_01C1C9A9.7EED4720--
- -
- -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
- -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
- -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email.
------------------------------
Date: 12 Mar 2002 06:39:23 -0800
From: "Tim Fisher"
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Pick list game (well my own)
90% of the stocks on my watch list are too extended to make a short list of
buy candidates. Of those that are not extended, CTX KKD HLYW have good
numbers and nice charts. A few LLURs like PETM are also intriguing...
At 05:10 PM 3/9/2002 -0500, you wrote:
>Hello,
>
>Several weeks ago there was a lot of discussion about picking stocks and
>keeping track of them, i think Duke started it, well anyway that's what i
>remember.
>
>Nothing ever really happened to generate a game list, but i did screen some
>stocks, below are the results after two weeks, i did another screen to get
>rid of ones with very high insider ownership.
>
>Stock picks 02 24 02 percent change ending 3 8 02
>Original list cut back, now < 60% held by insiders, i think that's still a
>lot, oh well.
>
>
>ACAI -2.2
>ATH -0.1
>BYD 13.0
>DMCX 6.5
>FCH 7.0
>GCO 11.2
>IAIA 18.3
>INVN 9.5
>ITLA -1.2
>MBG 2.7
>MGAM 12.7
>MKT -4.7
>MME -5.4
>PORT 3.2
>RAH 1.3
>RKY 4.5
>SCVL -4.4
>WEBK -1.4
>
>Total 3.9 percent gain
>
>No. of stocks sold, = 0 (criteria -8% drop)
>
>
>-
>-To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
>-In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
>-"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email.
Tim Fisher
Ore-ROCK-On Rockhounding Web Site
Owner, Fisher Fisheries, Ltd.
mailto:tim@OreRockOn.com
WWW http://OreRockOn.com
- -
- -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
- -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
- -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email.
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 10:20:25 -0500
From: "Rob Miller"
Subject: [CANSLIM] Microcap Question
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
- ------=_NextPart_000_0045_01C1C9AF.86621840
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Tom, I'm hoping you can answer this question for me since microcaps are =
your main interest. I've not dealt with them much in the past. I've =
been following a few microcaps (<$80 million market cap) and I'm =
confused about the movements in the bid/ask prices. Assume the spread =
is 7 X 7.15 with most trades, small lots, split evenly between those =
hitting the bid and those taking the ask. However, the action is slow. =
Then, the bid suddenly drops to 6.90, 6.85, 6.80, 6.75. Several trades =
go off at 6.75 over just a few seconds, then the bid jumps back up to =
7.00, at which point the trading becomes slow again. The ask never =
changes. In some cases, trades go off below the bid price. =20
I can understand when someone withdraws their bid causing the bid to =
drop, but it seems strange that several trades go off at what appears to =
be far below the prevailing market price. No trades, bid drops for a =
few seconds, a few quick trades, then bid goes back up. What causes =
this? It seems to scripted to be accidental. =20
Thanks,
Rob=20
- ------=_NextPart_000_0045_01C1C9AF.86621840
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Tom, I'm hoping you can answer this =
question for me=20
since microcaps are your main interest. I've not dealt with them =
much in=20
the past. I've been following a few microcaps (<$80 million =
market cap)=20
and I'm confused about the movements in the bid/ask prices. Assume =
the spread is 7 X 7.15 with most trades, small lots, split evenly =
between=20
those hitting the bid and those taking the ask. However, the =
action is=20
slow. Then, the bid suddenly drops to 6.90, 6.85, 6.80, =
6.75. =20
Several trades go off at 6.75 over just a few seconds, then the bid =
jumps back=20
up to 7.00, at which point the trading becomes slow again. The ask =
never=20
changes. In some cases, trades go off below the bid price. =20
I can understand when someone withdraws =
their bid=20
causing the bid to drop, but it seems strange that several trades go =
off at=20
what appears to be far below the prevailing market price. No =
trades,=20
bid drops for a few seconds, a few quick trades, then bid goes =
back=20
up. What causes this? It seems to scripted to be=20
accidental.
Thanks,
Rob
- ------=_NextPart_000_0045_01C1C9AF.86621840--
- -
- -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
- -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
- -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email.
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 10:27:44 -0500
From: "Duke Miller"
Subject: RE: UOPX (was: [CANSLIM] VectorVest fundies)
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
- ------=_NextPart_000_0023_01C1C9B0.8C2CFC30
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Patrick & Katherine:
I got stopped out as well.
Upon heeding your advice Katherine, a glance at IBD Industry Group lists the
following:
U of Phnx Onln
Ticktmstr CIB
Hotel Rsrv Nwk
Net Bank Inc.
Neoforma Inc
Global Sports
Getty Images
1800Flowers.cm
Expedia Inc
eBay Inc.
Digital River
DoubleClick
Cryptologic
Amazon Comm
What in the name of WON do post-secondary education companies like UOPX have
in common with Ticketmaster?!?! At Multex (you can register for free) they
have a 54 page Piper-Jaffrey report on the industry and feature the
following companies in the report:
In This Report:
APOL, CECO, COCO, DTHK, EDMC, EDSN, LSPN, LTRE, REVU, RLRN, SCHS,
SLVN, SMTF, UOPS
Certainly worth a look-see. And further testimony that IBD needs to
continue refining its industry groups.
Duke
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com
[mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of Katherine Malm
Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 12:01 AM
To: canslim@lists.xmission.com
Subject: Re: UOPX (was: [CANSLIM] VectorVest fundies)
Hi Patrick,
Three essential reasons:
(1) APOL, the parent, owns the lion's share of outstanding shares. As goes
APOL, so goes UOPX. APOL made a feeble attempt at breaking out of a cup with
no handle 2/26. Immediately tailed down the following day. No valid handle
to go with the rest of the cup, so APOL's breakout on 3/4 was bogus in my
mind. UOPX gapped and staged an attempted B/O on the same day, but given
APOL's lousy chart, I put the odds of UOPX's B/O succeeding at very low.
(2) At the time I saw UOPX setting up, its forward PE (not trailing) based
on EPS estimates and growth rate had it at 2 times the industry average. In
a market where value has been steadily outperforming growth, I know that no
stock that is so significantly overpriced by comparison has a chance of
going anywhere.
(3) The rest of the stocks in the industry are also setting up, so the
industry is strong. I would rather choose another stock in the same industry
with a better "story", technicals and valuation as a result.
Katherine
----- Original Message -----
From: Patrick Wahl
To: canslim@lists.xmission.com
Sent: Sunday, March 10, 2002 1:05 PM
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] VectorVest fundies
If you don't mind one more question, just briefly why did you say a day
or two ago
that you thought UOPX was not a suitable Canslim buy candidate?
My limited examination of the fundamentals didn't turn up any obvious
problems,
and technically I thought it looked ok. As I mentioned last week, I had
questions
about its longer term potential, but short term could not see anything
wrong.
- ------=_NextPart_000_0023_01C1C9B0.8C2CFC30
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Patrick &=20
Katherine:
I got stopped =
out as=20
well.
Upon heeding =
your advice=20
Katherine, a glance at IBD Industry Group lists the=20
following:
U of Phnx =
Onln |
Ticktmstr =
CIB |
Hotel Rsrv =
Nwk |
Net Bank =
Inc. |
Neoforma =
Inc |
Global =
Sports |
Getty =
Images |
1800Flowers.cm |
Expedia Inc |
eBay Inc. |
Digital =
River |
DoubleClick |
Cryptologic |
Amazon=20
Comm |
What in the =
name of WON do=20
post-secondary education companies like UOPX have in common=20
with Ticketmaster?!?! At Multex (you can register for free) =
they have=20
a 54 page Piper-Jaffrey report on the industry and feature the =
following=20
companies in the report:
In This Report: |
APOL, CECO, COCO, DTHK, EDMC, EDSN, LSPN, =
LTRE, REVU,=20
RLRN, SCHS, SLVN, SMTF, =
UOPS |
Certainly worth =
a=20
look-see. And further testimony that IBD needs to continue =
refining its=20
industry groups.
Duke
Hi Patrick,
Three essential reasons:
(1) APOL, the parent, owns the lion's share of outstanding =
shares. As=20
goes APOL, so goes UOPX. APOL made a feeble attempt at breaking out of =
a cup=20
with no handle 2/26. Immediately tailed down the following day. No =
valid=20
handle to go with the rest of the cup, so APOL's breakout on 3/4=20
was bogus in my mind. UOPX gapped and staged an attempted B/O on =
the same=20
day, but given APOL's lousy chart, I put the odds of UOPX's B/O =
succeeding at=20
very low.
(2) At the time I saw UOPX setting up, its forward PE (not =
trailing)=20
based on EPS estimates and growth rate had it at 2 times the industry =
average.=20
In a market where value has been steadily outperforming growth, I know =
that no=20
stock that is so significantly overpriced by comparison has a chance =
of going=20
anywhere.
(3) The rest of the stocks in the industry are also setting up, =
so the=20
industry is strong. I would rather choose another stock in the same =
industry=20
with a better "story", technicals and valuation as a result.
Katherine
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, March 10, 2002 =
1:05=20
PM
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] =
VectorVest=20
fundies
If you don't mind one more question, just briefly why =
did you=20
say a day or two ago
that you thought UOPX was not a suitable =
Canslim=20
buy candidate?
My limited examination of the fundamentals =
didn't turn=20
up any obvious problems,
and technically I thought it looked =
ok. =20
As I mentioned last week, I had questions
about its longer term=20
potential, but short term could not see anything=20
wrong.
- ------=_NextPart_000_0023_01C1C9B0.8C2CFC30--
- -
- -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
- -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
- -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email.
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 08:42:45 -0700
From: "Patrick Wahl"
Subject: RE: UOPX (was: [CANSLIM] VectorVest fundies)
I didn't get into UOPX, couldn't convince myself it was a great industry. I have also
been avoiding breakouts for the most part. If a stock I like breaks out, I have been
watching it and seeing if it pulls back and how it acts, then I might get in, but I see
too many breakouts fail lately to get in on the initial breakout. (like I said a couple
months ago, you could make more money shorting breakouts than buying them)
Interesting industry grouping....
On 12 Mar 2002 at 10:27, Duke Miller wrote:
> Patrick & Katherine:
>
> I got stopped out as well.
>
> Upon heeding your advice Katherine, a glance at IBD Industry Group lists the
> following:
> U of Phnx Onln
> Ticktmstr CIB
> Hotel Rsrv Nwk
> Net Bank Inc.
> Neoforma Inc
> Global Sports
> Getty Images
> 1800Flowers.cm
> Expedia Inc
> eBay Inc.
> Digital River
> DoubleClick
> Cryptologic
> Amazon Comm
>
>
> What in the name of WON do post-secondary education companies like UOPX have
> in common with Ticketmaster?!?! At Multex (you can register for free) they
> have a 54 page Piper-Jaffrey report on the industry and feature the
> following companies in the report:
>
> In This Report:
> APOL, CECO, COCO, DTHK, EDMC, EDSN, LSPN, LTRE, REVU, RLRN, SCHS,
> SLVN, SMTF, UOPS
>
>
>
>
> Certainly worth a look-see. And further testimony that IBD needs to
> continue refining its industry groups.
>
> Duke
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com
> [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of Katherine Malm
> Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 12:01 AM
> To: canslim@lists.xmission.com
> Subject: Re: UOPX (was: [CANSLIM] VectorVest fundies)
>
>
> Hi Patrick,
>
> Three essential reasons:
>
> (1) APOL, the parent, owns the lion's share of outstanding shares. As goes
> APOL, so goes UOPX. APOL made a feeble attempt at breaking out of a cup with
> no handle 2/26. Immediately tailed down the following day. No valid handle
> to go with the rest of the cup, so APOL's breakout on 3/4 was bogus in my
> mind. UOPX gapped and staged an attempted B/O on the same day, but given
> APOL's lousy chart, I put the odds of UOPX's B/O succeeding at very low.
>
> (2) At the time I saw UOPX setting up, its forward PE (not trailing) based
> on EPS estimates and growth rate had it at 2 times the industry average. In
> a market where value has been steadily outperforming growth, I know that no
> stock that is so significantly overpriced by comparison has a chance of
> going anywhere.
>
> (3) The rest of the stocks in the industry are also setting up, so the
> industry is strong. I would rather choose another stock in the same industry
> with a better "story", technicals and valuation as a result.
>
> Katherine
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Patrick Wahl
> To: canslim@lists.xmission.com
> Sent: Sunday, March 10, 2002 1:05 PM
> Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] VectorVest fundies
>
>
> If you don't mind one more question, just briefly why did you say a day
> or two ago
> that you thought UOPX was not a suitable Canslim buy candidate?
>
> My limited examination of the fundamentals didn't turn up any obvious
> problems,
> and technically I thought it looked ok. As I mentioned last week, I had
> questions
> about its longer term potential, but short term could not see anything
> wrong.
>
- -
- -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
- -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
- -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email.
------------------------------
End of canslim-digest V2 #2195
******************************
To unsubscribe to canslim-digest, send an email to "majordomo@xmission.com"
with "unsubscribe canslim-digest" in the body of the message.
For information on digests or retrieving files and old messages send
"help" to the same address. Do not use quotes in your message.