From: owner-canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com (canslim-digest) To: canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com Subject: canslim-digest V2 #2588 Reply-To: canslim Sender: owner-canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com Errors-To: owner-canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com Precedence: bulk Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-No-Archive: yes canslim-digest Monday, July 8 2002 Volume 02 : Number 2588 In this issue: RE: [CANSLIM] There is no 'P' in CAN SLIM Re: [CANSLIM] Off topic: politics/judgmentalism Re: [CANSLIM] Off topic: politics/judgmentalism Re: [CANSLIM] "M" [CANSLIM] AvgVol Re: [CANSLIM] Duke13139@aol.com Re: [CANSLIM] There is no 'P' in CAN SLIM ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2002 22:27:39 -0400 From: "inderjit" Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] There is no 'P' in CAN SLIM This is a multi-part message in MIME format. - ------=_NextPart_000_0064_01C226CE.ABA79400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit OK, but all the canslimmers P ;-) - -----Original Message----- From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com] On Behalf Of Duke Miller Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 3:59 PM To: canslim@lists.xmission.com Subject: [CANSLIM] There is no 'P' in CAN SLIM Dear friends of CAN SLIM: This list is ALL about improving our CAN SLIM techniques. It's about discussing stocks we may (or may not) be interested in, with input/output BASED ON how those issues that either fit (or don't) WON's philosophy. The list has received accolades often for its maturity, sophisticated opinions, and the willingness of the members to help one another. Many members have spent much time and effort developing those skills for many years, not to mention money on seminars, books, subscriptions, etc. All of which is gladly shared amongst the membership regardless your level of sophistication. 100% of us still have questions and always will. That is why we're here. Here's a suggestion: If you have something to discuss that doesn't fit the above criteria, please do so "off-list." For those of you who don't know what that is, just look in the header of the message where it says, "on behalf of (email address of sender)". Send that person an email and say what you will. I have "off-list" discussions several times a week. Please....this is not a free-speech issue; it's not a liberal or conservative agenda; nor is this a "thread" on the Internet (99% of which are broken in due time). This is a community of people who have one thing in common, who like each other, and who deal with issues in a mature manner, without profanity or personal slurs. Duke Miller, a.k.a. "The Old Duke" - -----Original Message----- From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com] On Behalf Of Duke13139@aol.com Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 11:43 AM To: canslim@lists.xmission.com Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Off topic: politics/judgmentalism 'zillagirl' please quit pretending to kill this thread off while getting in the last word. You're what you are and you've been exposed. - ------=_NextPart_000_0064_01C226CE.ABA79400 Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message
OK, but all the = canslimmers P=20 ;-)
-----Original Message-----
From:=20 owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com = [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]=20 On Behalf Of Duke Miller
Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 = 3:59=20 PM
To: canslim@lists.xmission.com
Subject: = [CANSLIM] There=20 is no 'P' in CAN SLIM

Dear friends = of CAN=20 SLIM:
 
This = list is ALL=20 about improving our CAN SLIM techniques.  It's about discussing = stocks we=20 may (or may not) be interested in, with input/output BASED ON how = those=20 issues that either fit (or don't) WON's philosophy.  The list has = received accolades often for its maturity, sophisticated opinions, and = the=20 willingness of the members to help one another.  Many=20 members have=20 spent much time and effort developing those skills for many years, not = to=20 mention money on seminars, books, subscriptions, etc.  All of = which is=20 gladly shared amongst the membership regardless your level of=20 sophistication. 
 
100% of us = still have=20 questions and always will.  That is why we're here. =20
 
Here's a=20 suggestion: 
 
If you have = something to=20 discuss that doesn't fit the above criteria, please do so=20 "off-list."  For those of you who don't know what that is, just = look in=20 the header of the message where it says, "on behalf of (email address = of=20 sender)".  Send that person an email and say what you will.  = I have=20 "off-list" discussions several times a week.  =
 
Please....this is not a=20 free-speech issue; it's not a liberal or conservative agenda; nor is = this a=20 "thread" on the Internet (99% of which are broken in due time).=20 This = is a=20 community of people who have one thing in common, who like each other, = and who=20 deal with issues in a mature manner, without profanity or personal=20 slurs. 
 
Duke Miller, = a.k.a. "The=20 Old Duke"
 
 
 
-----Original Message-----
From:=20 owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com = [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]=20 On Behalf Of Duke13139@aol.com
Sent: Monday, July = 08, 2002=20 11:43 AM
To: canslim@lists.xmission.com
Subject: = Re:=20 [CANSLIM] Off topic: = politics/judgmentalism

'zillagirl' please quit pretending to kill this = thread=20 off while getting in the last word. You're what you are and you've = been=20 = exposed.

- ------=_NextPart_000_0064_01C226CE.ABA79400-- - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2002 22:31:57 -0400 From: "Tom Worley" Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Off topic: politics/judgmentalism Thanks Jack, I am just happy that I had one stock up over 14% for the day to a new all time high, helped make up for some of the laggards and break even for the day. I certainly agree with Ann, politics are not a right/wrong issue. And everyone has a right to post their opinion, even if it may be off topic, at least when CANSLIM business is so slow. I would like to see us taking this opportunity to dig into more CANSLIM issues and questions, and do some paper trading and analysis of stocks trying to be leaders in a very ugly "M", they must may be the real leaders soon. With all the accounting credibility issues before us, would not hurt to identify 10 or 20 potential leaders, and get the group to work digging into them on our own. - ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jack Tencza" To: Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 10:59 AM Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Off topic: politics/judgmentalism Ann, the good news is that "they" are easy to identify. Then when you review your email list you can delete them and avoid the stuff! I've been doing it for weeks. I really appreciate the 30% THAT HAVE EXCELLENT CONTENT, Mike, Katherine, Tom etc. Jack - --- Ann wrote: > I haven't posted in ages, but I just have to > comment. > > First of all, I think it's ridiculous that some > people on this list act as > though whether you are a liberal or conservative is > a right/wrong issue, > rather than varying points of view. > > And the silliest part of it is that this board isn't > about politics, anyway! > > But the board was much nicer before this nasty tone > set in. > > Ann > > > > > - > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email > "majordomo@xmission.com" > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ===== Jack __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Sign up for SBC Yahoo! Dial - First Month Free http://sbc.yahoo.com - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2002 22:35:51 -0400 From: "Tom Worley" Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Off topic: politics/judgmentalism This is a multi-part message in MIME format. - ------=_NextPart_000_0081_01C226CF.D082BD30 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Duke13139, I was not aware you were appointed as the "off topic cop", must have = missed the election.=20 So how about I kill this thread, and ask everyone to knock it off and = stop responding further. Enough is enough, and I am particularly = incensed not by the off topic chatter, but rather by the personal = attacking going on. That is not allowed, and I will not hesitate to = bring it to the attention of the list owner.=20 Either get back to CANSLIM, or stop posting, please (note: I did say = please) - ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Duke13139@aol.com=20 To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20 Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 11:43 AM Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Off topic: politics/judgmentalism 'zillagirl' please quit pretending to kill this thread off while getting = in the last word. You're what you are and you've been exposed. - ------=_NextPart_000_0081_01C226CF.D082BD30 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Duke13139,
 
I was not aware you were appointed as the "off = topic cop",=20 must have missed the election.
 
So how about I kill this thread, and ask = everyone to knock=20 it off and stop responding further. Enough is enough, and I am = particularly=20 incensed not by the off topic chatter, but rather by the personal = attacking=20 going on. That is not allowed, and I will not hesitate to bring it to = the=20 attention of the list owner.
 
Either get back to CANSLIM, or stop posting, = please (note:=20 I did say please)
 
----- Original Message -----=20
From: Duke13139@aol.com=20
Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 11:43 AM
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Off topic: = politics/judgmentalism

'zillagirl' please quit pretending to kill this = thread off=20 while getting in the last word. You're what you are and you've been=20 exposed.

 - ------=_NextPart_000_0081_01C226CF.D082BD30-- - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2002 22:48:20 -0400 From: "Tom Worley" Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] "M" This is a multi-part message in MIME format. - ------=_NextPart_000_00C8_01C226D1.8E87CCC0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Correct, but apparently the perception in the industry was that revenues = were more important than earnings, because the larger your sales, the = better a deal you were likely to swing from providers and vendors and = clients. Thus a 10% inflation of revenues made you look bigger than = reality, and suggest Medco, in this case, would extract better pricing, = be able to pass some of that savings along to its clients (employers), = thus further increasing business while eventually helping profits and = profit margins.=20 Merck's justification for this was that they believed they were = responsible if they misstated the patient's co-payment requirement (e.g. = told a pharmacy to collect $5 when it should have been $10), but = apparently this was not a true liability nor one ever paid by Medco. I really found it interesting that a big 4 accounting firm would sign = off on one company's financial treatment of this issue, then sign off on = another company handling it totally differently. - ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Rocky Sanghvi=20 To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20 Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 9:37 AM Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] "M" Infact Merck understated their Gross Margins by doing this. =20 - -----Original Message----- From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com = [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of Katherine Malm Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 9:42 AM To: canslim@lists.xmission.com Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] "M" Tom, your message had me scratching my head. Didn't make sense that = Merck would post monies not due to them as revenue. Ah...but now it makes more sense...here's the explanation offered at = Briefing.com (highlighting is mine): 06:53 ET MRK Merck booked $12.4 bln in revenue never collected = - -- WSJ (48.86)=20 The Wall Street Journal, citing an SEC filing, reports that company = recorded $12.4 bln in revenue from its Medco pharmacy-benefits unit over = the past 3 years that the subsidiary never collected. According to the = article, Medco included as part of its revenue the co-payments collected = by pharmacies from patients, even though it doesn't receive those funds. = Between 1999 and 2001, co-payments comprised nearly 10% of Merck's = overall reported revenue. Merck first disclosed the accounting treatment = in an April SEC filing for Medco's IPO, but didn't disclose the amount = of revenue involved until a filing on Friday. Merck says the accounting = treatment has no effect on its net income because it subtracts the same = amount as expense.=20 Accounting rules would allow this kind of treatment (even though it's a = bit silly to show the monies at all unless the co-payments run through = their hands at some point). Just goes to show why growth in earnings = *AND* revenues are equally important when doing a fundamental review. Katherine ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Tom Worley=20 To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20 Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 6:23 AM Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] "M" One further thought on Merck's treatment of patient co-payments, which resulted in the Friday filing with the SEC disclosing that nearly 10% = of its reported revenue since 1999 was never collected. Their auditor, Price Waterhouse Cooper, signed off on this methodology = even though Express Scripts, the third largest pharmacy provider, does not include patient co-payments. Who is the auditor for Express? Price Waterhouse Cooper. And the largest provider, Advance PCS, also does = not include patient co-payments, while the fourth largest, Caremark RX, = does include these payments. One might ask how one of the big 4 auditing firms can find treatment = of patient co-payment to be one way and consistent with GAAP, yet treat = it differently at another firm. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tom Worley" To: "CANSLIM" Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 7:05 AM Subject: [CANSLIM] "M" Well, why should today be any different? Instead of terrorist attack = fears, we have renewed accounting fears, this time with Merck apparently overstating revenues by a trivial $12 billion with their pharmacy = benefits unit. What's $12 billion among friends anyway? Only enough to turn = Asia around from a nice 1% or better gain across the board into red ink for almost every exchange. Japan, which had been up nearly 200 points and breaking 11,000 once again, ended closing down 56 points. And Europe = is down across the board, while USA futures suggest a 1 to 1.5% drop on the = open. In Mexico, former officials of the govt owned PEMEX and some = businessmen are being investigated for paying $134 million for a petrochemical plant = that was never built. Some of those officials were also under investigation earlier this year for company contributions of $100 million to the = campaign of presidential candidate Francisco Labastida. Some things just don't seem to be changing, or getting better. Tom Worley stkguru@bellsouth.net AIM: TexWorley - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. - ------=_NextPart_000_00C8_01C226D1.8E87CCC0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Correct, but apparently the perception in the = industry was=20 that revenues were more important than earnings, because the larger your = sales,=20 the better a deal you were likely to swing from providers and vendors = and=20 clients. Thus a 10% inflation of revenues made you look bigger than = reality, and=20 suggest Medco, in this case, would extract better pricing, be able to = pass some=20 of that savings along to its clients (employers), thus further = increasing=20 business while eventually helping profits and profit margins. =
 
Merck's justification for this was that they = believed they=20 were responsible if they misstated the patient's co-payment requirement = (e.g.=20 told a pharmacy to collect $5 when it should have been $10), but = apparently this=20 was not a true liability nor one ever paid by Medco.
 
I really found it interesting that a big 4 = accounting firm=20 would sign off on one company's financial treatment of this issue, then = sign off=20 on another company handling it totally differently.
 
----- Original Message -----=20
From: Rocky = Sanghvi
Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 9:37 AM
Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] "M"

Infact=20 Merck understated their Gross Margins by doing this.  =20
 
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-canslim@lists.xmis= sion.com=20 [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of Katherine=20 Malm
Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 9:42 AM
To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=
Subject:=20 Re: [CANSLIM] "M"

Tom, your message had me scratching my head. Didn't make sense that = Merck=20 would post monies not due to them as revenue.
 
Ah...but now it makes more sense...here's the explanation offered = at=20 Briefing.com (highlighting is mine):
 
06:53 ET   MRK  Merck=20 booked $12.4 bln in revenue never collected -- WSJ = (48.86)
The Wall Street Journal, citing an SEC filing, = reports that=20 company recorded $12.4 bln in revenue from its Medco = pharmacy-benefits=20 unit over the past 3 years that the subsidiary never collected. = According=20 to the article, Medco included as part of its revenue the = co-payments=20 collected by pharmacies from patients, even though it doesn't = receive=20 those funds. Between 1999 and 2001, co-payments comprised nearly = 10% of=20 Merck's overall reported revenue. Merck first disclosed the = accounting=20 treatment in an April SEC filing for Medco's IPO, but didn't = disclose the=20 amount of revenue involved until a filing on Friday. Merck says the accounting treatment = has no=20 effect on its net income because it subtracts the same amount as=20 expense.
 
Accounting rules would allow this kind of treatment (even though = it's a bit=20 silly to show the monies at all unless the co-payments run through their = hands=20 at some point). Just goes to show why growth in earnings *AND* revenues = are=20 equally important when doing a fundamental review.
 
Katherine
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Tom=20 Worley
Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 = 6:23 AM
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] = "M"

One further thought on Merck's treatment of patient=20 co-payments, which
resulted in the Friday filing with the SEC = disclosing=20 that nearly 10% of its
reported revenue since 1999 was never=20 collected.

Their auditor, Price Waterhouse Cooper, signed off = on this=20 methodology even
though Express Scripts, the third largest pharmacy = provider, does not
include patient co-payments. Who is the auditor = for=20 Express? Price
Waterhouse Cooper. And the largest provider, Advance = PCS,=20 also does not
include patient co-payments, while the fourth = largest,=20 Caremark RX, does
include these payments.

One might ask how = one of=20 the big 4 auditing firms can find treatment of
patient co-payment = to be one=20 way and consistent with GAAP, yet treat it
differently at another=20 firm.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Tom Worley" <stkguru@bellsouth.net>
To= :=20 "CANSLIM" <canslim@lists.xmission.com= >
Sent:=20 Monday, July 08, 2002 7:05 AM
Subject: [CANSLIM] = "M"


Well, why=20 should today be any different? Instead of terrorist attack = fears,
we have=20 renewed accounting fears, this time with Merck = apparently
overstating=20 revenues by a trivial $12 billion with their pharmacy = benefits
unit. What's=20 $12 billion among friends anyway? Only enough to turn Asia
around = from a=20 nice 1% or better gain across the board into red ink for
almost = every=20 exchange. Japan, which had been up nearly 200 points and
breaking = 11,000=20 once again, ended closing down 56 points. And Europe is down
across = the=20 board, while USA futures suggest a 1 to 1.5% drop on the = open.

In=20 Mexico, former officials of the govt owned PEMEX and some businessmen=20 are
being investigated for paying $134 million for a petrochemical = plant=20 that
was never built. Some of those officials were also under=20 investigation
earlier this year for company contributions of $100 = million=20 to the campaign
of presidential candidate Francisco = Labastida.

Some=20 things just don't seem to be changing, or getting better.

Tom=20 Worley
stkguru@bellsouth.net
AIM:=20 TexWorley



-
-To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
-In= the=20 email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
-"unsubscribe = canslim".  Do=20 not use quotes in your email.




-
-To=20 subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
-In= the=20 email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
-"unsubscribe = canslim".  Do=20 not use quotes in your email. - ------=_NextPart_000_00C8_01C226D1.8E87CCC0-- - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 08 Jul 2002 21:57:55 -0500 From: Gene Ricci Subject: [CANSLIM] AvgVol This is a multi-part message in MIME format. - ------=_NextPart_000_0221_01C226CA.83A23450 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Tom, do you have an upper limit on AvgVol? Many thanks, Gene ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Tom Worley=20 To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20 Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 9:48 PM Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] "M" Correct, but apparently the perception in the industry was that = revenues were more important than earnings, because the larger your = sales, the better a deal you were likely to swing from providers and = vendors and clients. Thus a 10% inflation of revenues made you look = bigger than reality, and suggest Medco, in this case, would extract = better pricing, be able to pass some of that savings along to its = clients (employers), thus further increasing business while eventually = helping profits and profit margins.=20 Merck's justification for this was that they believed they were = responsible if they misstated the patient's co-payment requirement (e.g. = told a pharmacy to collect $5 when it should have been $10), but = apparently this was not a true liability nor one ever paid by Medco. I really found it interesting that a big 4 accounting firm would sign = off on one company's financial treatment of this issue, then sign off on = another company handling it totally differently. - ------=_NextPart_000_0221_01C226CA.83A23450 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Tom, do you have an upper limit on=20 AvgVol?
 
Many thanks,
Gene
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Tom=20 Worley
Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 = 9:48 PM
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] = "M"

Correct, but apparently the perception in the = industry=20 was that revenues were more important than earnings, because the = larger your=20 sales, the better a deal you were likely to swing from providers and = vendors=20 and clients. Thus a 10% inflation of revenues made you look bigger = than=20 reality, and suggest Medco, in this case, would extract better = pricing, be=20 able to pass some of that savings along to its clients (employers), = thus=20 further increasing business while eventually helping profits and = profit=20 margins.
 
Merck's justification for this was that they = believed=20 they were responsible if they misstated the patient's co-payment = requirement=20 (e.g. told a pharmacy to collect $5 when it should have been $10), but = apparently this was not a true liability nor one ever paid by=20 Medco.
 
I really found it interesting that a big 4 = accounting=20 firm would sign off on one company's financial treatment of this = issue, then=20 sign off on another company handling it totally = differently.
 
- ------=_NextPart_000_0221_01C226CA.83A23450-- - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: 8 Jul 2002 19:37:49 -0700 From: "Tim Fisher" Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Duke13139@aol.com TY Jeff! At 05:30 PM 7/8/2002 -0600, you wrote: >Hello Canslim'ers, > >Duke13139@aol.com attempted to leave our group with a flaming post. FYI, >his final posting was intercepted, sent to the bit bucket, and he was >dismissed from our group. You can put him behind you like a bad case of >the vapors and get back to your usual dialogue... > >Jeff - canslim admin/owner - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email >"majordomo@xmission.com" -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or >-"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. Tim Fisher Ore-ROCK-On Rockhounding Web Site Owner, Fisher Fisheries, Ltd. mailto:tim@OreRockOn.com WWW http://OreRockOn.com - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2002 23:55:10 -0400 From: "Tom Worley" Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] There is no 'P' in CAN SLIM This is a multi-part message in MIME format. - ------=_NextPart_000_02AE_01C226DA.E4DF4A40 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MessageHi Winston, I have found that many members address shows if you just click on = Forward (which makes it easy to take the reply off the group thread). If = the address is still not revealed, just right clicking the sender's name = and selecting properties usually will show it. If that doesn't work, go = back to the original email and right click the sender's name there. One = or the other of these have worked for me whenever I have wanted to send = a private post to a member. - ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Winston Little=20 To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20 Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 4:10 PM Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] There is no 'P' in CAN SLIM Old Duke: You make an OUTSTANDING recommendation to the particpants who ought = to be transmitting messages and notes "OFF LIST". However, my observation is that some messages arrive WITHOUT the e-mail = address of the sender anywhere in or on the note. Thus the potential = recipient is unable to respond directly if they feel compelled to do so. = Perhaps the senders of notes can help improve the situation by making = sure that their e-mail address is attached or inserted. ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Duke Miller=20 To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20 Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 3:59 PM Subject: [CANSLIM] There is no 'P' in CAN SLIM Dear friends of CAN SLIM: This list is ALL about improving our CAN SLIM techniques. It's about = discussing stocks we may (or may not) be interested in, with = input/output BASED ON how those issues that either fit (or don't) WON's = philosophy. The list has received accolades often for its maturity, = sophisticated opinions, and the willingness of the members to help one = another. Many members have spent much time and effort developing those = skills for many years, not to mention money on seminars, books, = subscriptions, etc. All of which is gladly shared amongst the = membership regardless your level of sophistication.=20 100% of us still have questions and always will. That is why we're = here. =20 Here's a suggestion: =20 If you have something to discuss that doesn't fit the above criteria, = please do so "off-list." For those of you who don't know what that is, = just look in the header of the message where it says, "on behalf of = (email address of sender)". Send that person an email and say what you = will. I have "off-list" discussions several times a week. =20 Please....this is not a free-speech issue; it's not a liberal or = conservative agenda; nor is this a "thread" on the Internet (99% of = which are broken in due time). This is a community of people who have = one thing in common, who like each other, and who deal with issues in a = mature manner, without profanity or personal slurs. =20 Duke Miller, a.k.a. "The Old Duke" -----Original Message----- From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com = [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com] On Behalf Of Duke13139@aol.com Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 11:43 AM To: canslim@lists.xmission.com Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Off topic: politics/judgmentalism 'zillagirl' please quit pretending to kill this thread off while = getting in the last word. You're what you are and you've been exposed. - ------=_NextPart_000_02AE_01C226DA.E4DF4A40 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message
Hi Winston,
 
I have found that many members address shows if = you just=20 click on Forward (which makes it easy to take the reply off the group = thread).=20 If the address is still not revealed, just right clicking the sender's = name and=20 selecting properties usually will show it. If that doesn't work, go back = to the=20 original email and right click the sender's name there. One or the other = of=20 these have worked for me whenever I have wanted to send a private post = to a=20 member.
 
----- Original Message -----=20
From: Winston=20 Little
Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 4:10 PM
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] There is no 'P' in CAN = SLIM

Old Duke:
    You make an OUTSTANDING = recommendation to=20 the particpants who ought to be transmitting messages and notes "OFF=20 LIST".
 
However, my observation is that some messages arrive = WITHOUT=20 the e-mail address of the sender anywhere in or on the note. Thus = the=20 potential recipient is unable to respond directly if they feel compelled = to do=20 so. Perhaps the senders of notes can help improve the situation by = making sure=20 that their e-mail address is attached or inserted.
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Duke=20 Miller
Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 = 3:59 PM
Subject: [CANSLIM] There is no = 'P' in CAN=20 SLIM

Dear friends = of CAN=20 SLIM:
 
This = list is ALL=20 about improving our CAN SLIM techniques.  It's about discussing = stocks we=20 may (or may not) be interested in, with input/output BASED ON how = those=20 issues that either fit (or don't) WON's philosophy.  The list has = received accolades often for its maturity, sophisticated opinions, and = the=20 willingness of the members to help one another.  Many=20 members have=20 spent much time and effort developing those skills for many years, not = to=20 mention money on seminars, books, subscriptions, etc.  All of = which is=20 gladly shared amongst the membership regardless your level of=20 sophistication. 
 
100% of us = still have=20 questions and always will.  That is why we're here. =20
 
Here's a=20 suggestion: 
 
If you have = something to=20 discuss that doesn't fit the above criteria, please do so=20 "off-list."  For those of you who don't know what that is, just = look in=20 the header of the message where it says, "on behalf of (email address = of=20 sender)".  Send that person an email and say what you will.  = I have=20 "off-list" discussions several times a week.  =
 
Please....this is not a=20 free-speech issue; it's not a liberal or conservative agenda; nor is = this a=20 "thread" on the Internet (99% of which are broken in due time).=20 This = is a=20 community of people who have one thing in common, who like each other, = and who=20 deal with issues in a mature manner, without profanity or personal=20 slurs. 
 
Duke Miller, = a.k.a. "The=20 Old Duke"
 
 
 
-----Original Message-----
From:=20 owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com = [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]=20 On Behalf Of Duke13139@aol.com
Sent: Monday, July = 08, 2002=20 11:43 AM
To: canslim@lists.xmission.com
Subject: = Re:=20 [CANSLIM] Off topic: = politics/judgmentalism

'zillagirl' please quit pretending to kill this = thread=20 off while getting in the last word. You're what you are and you've = been=20 = exposed.

- ------=_NextPart_000_02AE_01C226DA.E4DF4A40-- - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ End of canslim-digest V2 #2588 ****************************** To unsubscribe to canslim-digest, send an email to "majordomo@xmission.com" with "unsubscribe canslim-digest" in the body of the message. For information on digests or retrieving files and old messages send "help" to the same address. Do not use quotes in your message.