From: owner-canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com (canslim-digest) To: canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com Subject: canslim-digest V2 #2778 Reply-To: canslim Sender: owner-canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com Errors-To: owner-canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com Precedence: bulk Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-No-Archive: yes canslim-digest Sunday, August 11 2002 Volume 02 : Number 2778 In this issue: [CANSLIM] Worley's Weekend Weeview - Part II Re: [CANSLIM] FW: Summer Relief Rally- Is It Possible? and Energy Power in the News Re: [CANSLIM] FW: Summer Relief Rally- Is It Possible? and Energy Power in the News Re: [CANSLIM] Worley's Weekend Weeview - Part II [CANSLIM] Japan RE: [CANSLIM] investment club Re: [CANSLIM] investment club Re: [CANSLIM] investment club Personal Preferences (Re: [CANSLIM] investment club) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Sun, 11 Aug 2002 10:33:48 -0400 From: "Tom Worley" Subject: [CANSLIM] Worley's Weekend Weeview - Part II Just some catch up trivia I found interesting this weekend from news at Yahoo. 91 percent of the S&P 500 companies have issued results so far this reporting period, and out of those, 60 percent have beaten analysts' estimates, 25 percent were on target, and 15 percent fell short of expectations As of midday Friday, 112 companies had signed oaths out of the 947 required to do so, according to the SEC's web site. full detailed list is at http://www.sec.gov/rules/extra/ceocfo.htm Operating earnings at the companies in the S&P 500 index are expected to show a slim gain of 0.9 percent in the second quarter, according to research firm Thomson First Call Tom Worley stkguru@bellsouth.net AIM: TexWorley - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 11 Aug 2002 07:40:17 -0700 From: Harvey Brion Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] FW: Summer Relief Rally- Is It Possible? and Energy Power in the News I wonder if the comment "The second bottom... slightly higher than the first... is a bullish indicator" may be referring to entering a higher-low-higher-high pattern (uptrend). Of course, we're still waiting for the first higher-high so it's a bit premature to call it bullish IMO. (Dow and S&P500 made sllightly higher highs on Friday so it will be positive if/when NASDAQ concurs.) Tom Worley wrote: > Mike, what I was referring to is the following quote:This past week > the NASDAQ broke up its' downtrend line (shown in red) for the first > time since the sell off steepened in mid May, leading to three months > of bloodletting on all the major indexes. > > In addition, the NASDAQ has recently put in a double bottom. The > second bottom was slightly higher than the first. Technicians will > tell you this is a bullish indicator in the short term. > > Last week was not the first time Naz broke up thru its downtrend line, > even on their own chart. And I don't know of any technicians that > prefer the second bottom to remain above the first bottom, least that > is not how I was trained on them. A good undercut doesn't guarantee > there won't be a third bottom, but the failure to undercut increases > the odds of a failed rally, and the "shortness" of the term for the > rally is thereby very much less predictable. The only ones I know that > would like this would be shorters looking for an improved selling > point, before the market tanks again to even lower levels. This is > contrary to their advice on NVDA and several other stocks, beaten down > by the market, which they see as bounce plays (which is what I > gathered they see on NVDA, buy for a bounce only, not because of the > fundies). > > I would add that the last double bottom by NASDAQ fooled me into false > belief (hope??) that the bottom had finally been reached. My standards > this time are more severe, even tho I remain fully invested, and beat > the indexes again last week. > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Mike Gibbons > To: canslim@lists.xmission.comSent: Saturday, August 10, 2002 5:21 > PMSubject: RE: [CANSLIM] FW: Summer Relief Rally- Is It Possible? and > Energy Power in the News > Thanks Tom for explaining the apparant contradiction - I need to look > beyond the end of my nose.Regarding the double-bottom, I presume you > are referring to the fact that the second bottom didn't undercut the > first. I guess a third bottom is somewhere in the NAS's future, which > seemed to be the conclusion anyway. Aloha, Mike GibbonsProactive > Technologies, LLChttp://www.proactech.com > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com > [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of Tom > Worley > Sent: Saturday, August 10, 2002 11:03 AM > To: canslim@lists.xmission.com > Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] FW: Summer Relief Rally- Is It > Possible? and Energy Power in the News > > Mike, as the newsletter says, NVDA indicated the future > looks bleak. Past 4 qtrs of fundamentals are very strong, > but now they will be comparing to those strong fundies for > the next 4 qtrs. And forecast from DGO indicates a 16% > decline in earnings this year, and only a 7% gain from that > lower level next year (which won't quite get them back to > what they made last year). I also disagree with some of the > statements made in the newsletter about the Naz chart, I am > not impressed with their reading, or their understanding of > a double bottom either.@lyris.otcjournal.com > - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 11 Aug 2002 10:47:23 -0400 From: "Tom Worley" Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] FW: Summer Relief Rally- Is It Possible? and Energy Power in the News doesn't count in my book until the higher high is put in, then you can look back to see if the last low was higher than the low before it. - ----- Original Message ----- From: "Harvey Brion" To: Sent: Sunday, August 11, 2002 10:40 AM Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] FW: Summer Relief Rally- Is It Possible? and Energy Power in the News I wonder if the comment "The second bottom... slightly higher than the first... is a bullish indicator" may be referring to entering a higher-low-higher-high pattern (uptrend). Of course, we're still waiting for the first higher-high so it's a bit premature to call it bullish IMO. (Dow and S&P500 made sllightly higher highs on Friday so it will be positive if/when NASDAQ concurs.) Tom Worley wrote: > Mike, what I was referring to is the following quote:This past week > the NASDAQ broke up its' downtrend line (shown in red) for the first > time since the sell off steepened in mid May, leading to three months > of bloodletting on all the major indexes. > > In addition, the NASDAQ has recently put in a double bottom. The > second bottom was slightly higher than the first. Technicians will > tell you this is a bullish indicator in the short term. > > Last week was not the first time Naz broke up thru its downtrend line, > even on their own chart. And I don't know of any technicians that > prefer the second bottom to remain above the first bottom, least that > is not how I was trained on them. A good undercut doesn't guarantee > there won't be a third bottom, but the failure to undercut increases > the odds of a failed rally, and the "shortness" of the term for the > rally is thereby very much less predictable. The only ones I know that > would like this would be shorters looking for an improved selling > point, before the market tanks again to even lower levels. This is > contrary to their advice on NVDA and several other stocks, beaten down > by the market, which they see as bounce plays (which is what I > gathered they see on NVDA, buy for a bounce only, not because of the > fundies). > > I would add that the last double bottom by NASDAQ fooled me into false > belief (hope??) that the bottom had finally been reached. My standards > this time are more severe, even tho I remain fully invested, and beat > the indexes again last week. > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Mike Gibbons > To: canslim@lists.xmission.comSent: Saturday, August 10, 2002 5:21 > PMSubject: RE: [CANSLIM] FW: Summer Relief Rally- Is It Possible? and > Energy Power in the News > Thanks Tom for explaining the apparant contradiction - I need to look > beyond the end of my nose.Regarding the double-bottom, I presume you > are referring to the fact that the second bottom didn't undercut the > first. I guess a third bottom is somewhere in the NAS's future, which > seemed to be the conclusion anyway. Aloha, Mike GibbonsProactive > Technologies, LLChttp://www.proactech.com > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com > [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of Tom > Worley > Sent: Saturday, August 10, 2002 11:03 AM > To: canslim@lists.xmission.com > Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] FW: Summer Relief Rally- Is It > Possible? and Energy Power in the News > > Mike, as the newsletter says, NVDA indicated the future > looks bleak. Past 4 qtrs of fundamentals are very strong, > but now they will be comparing to those strong fundies for > the next 4 qtrs. And forecast from DGO indicates a 16% > decline in earnings this year, and only a 7% gain from that > lower level next year (which won't quite get them back to > what they made last year). I also disagree with some of the > statements made in the newsletter about the Naz chart, I am > not impressed with their reading, or their understanding of > a double bottom either.@lyris.otcjournal.com > - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 11 Aug 2002 10:48:04 -0400 From: "Dan Forant" Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Worley's Weekend Weeview - Part II Yes, I've seen these figures somewhere also, it's a very good sign the rally may keep going. I predicted the fall for the dust to settle. Earlier good news is welcome. However the press doesn't seem to want to emulate these findings just yet. In my local papers the liberal press headlines bad news and buries good stats. I hope Americans wake up and smell the coffee and read between the lines. DanF - ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tom Worley" To: "CANSLIM" Sent: Sunday, August 11, 2002 10:33 AM Subject: [CANSLIM] Worley's Weekend Weeview - Part II > Just some catch up trivia I found interesting this weekend from news at > Yahoo. > > 91 percent of the S&P 500 companies have issued results so far this > reporting period, and out of those, 60 percent have beaten analysts' > estimates, 25 percent were on target, and 15 percent fell short of > expectations > > As of midday Friday, 112 companies had signed oaths out of the 947 required > to do so, according to the SEC's web site. full detailed list is at > http://www.sec.gov/rules/extra/ceocfo.htm > > Operating earnings at the companies in the S&P 500 index are expected to > show a slim gain of 0.9 percent in the second quarter, according to research > firm Thomson First Call > > Tom Worley > stkguru@bellsouth.net > AIM: TexWorley > > > > - > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. > - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 10 Aug 2002 18:05:55 -0400 From: "Tom Worley" Subject: [CANSLIM] Japan I haven't been Japan bashing much lately, but found this report from Strategic Forces to be very interesting. I pass it along just in case you want something else to worry about. - ----- Original Message ----- Sent: Friday, August 09, 2002 5:38 PM Subject: This Week's Global Economic Update ___________________________________________________________________ S T R A T F O R THE GLOBAL INTELLIGENCE COMPANY http://www.stratfor.com ___________________________________________________________________ Japan: Revised Reform Slows Economic Demise Summary Japanese Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi has altered a banking reform that, if implemented in their original form, could have caused the collapse of the country's economy. But a new loophole in the plan will lead to only a steady bleeding of assets from the banking sector, at a slow enough rate that the world need not worry over much about the sector's demise. Analysis Japanese Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi altered his banking "reform" plans Aug. 1 in a way that in essence waters down their impacts and imposes negative interest rates on savings accounts. He followed the move with a retraction of his previous pledge to limit Japan's profligate deficit spending . Under the original banking reform package, the government planned to end insurance guarantees on all deposits of more than 10 million yen ($83,000) starting on April 1, 2002. The plan as originally intended likely would have triggered an unravelling of the Japanese economy, but a recent loophole Koizumi inserted ensures a slower, less painful death. At stake is 300 trillion yen ($2.5 trillion) in deposits. With the Japanese economy locked into a deflationary spiral, the end of deposit insurance would almost certainly collapse many of Japan's already wobbly banks, particularly the smaller ones that would see many of their customers flee with their savings to larger, supposedly more stable banks. The international fallout also could be catastrophic, as a formal collapse of Japan's banks - -- along with the world's second-largest economy -- could cause a panic that would make the 1997 Asian financial crisis look like small potatoes. The financial system got a taste of what was coming when the reform was adopted April 1 for timed deposits. The day before the switchover, the total amount held in timed deposits, installment savings and loan trusts dropped 27 percent from a year ago, while deposits in ordinary savings accounts shot up 51 percent, according to the Bank of Japan. The key is that the first category of savings is rather illiquid, and most depositors were willing to take a financial hit when they switched over their accounts in order to keep government guarantees. Completely ending deposit insurance for demand deposits -- standard savings accounts -- would provoke a much sharper and more damaging response. Officially, Koizumi says the full reform will still be implemented as planned, but in traditional Japanese fashion he has inserted a loophole that renders it meaningless. Federal deposit guarantees will still apply to non-interest-bearing accounts. However, since interest rates have been at zero for the better part of the past three years -- pushing the payback on savings accounts down to a pathetic 0.001 percent per year -- switching over to a non-interest-bearing account is a no-brainer, even if the account charges fees. With such a policy, the banks and government in essence would levy a negative interest rate on savings accounts. In exchange for insurance, depositors sacrifice a portion of their holdings. Unlike many aborted Japanese reforms, the revised proposal if adopted will not worsen Japan's economy. In fact, it will have a number of broad-ranging effects that will help manage the economy's decline. It should indeed calm the frayed nerves of many Japanese citizens afraid of losing their savings. Money will still steadily leak out of the banks, but not in a panicked torrent that results in a sharp banking collapse. The money that does leave will go into two places: new investments and cold storage. In Japan, choices are very limited. Investment funds are heavily exposed to the government bond market, which has been paying zero and near-zero returns for the past several years. That leaves stock (and especially property) a standard refuge for scared capital. Any losses the banks suffer from deposit withdrawals should be made up by higher stock and property prices; after all, it was the collapse of stock and property prices -- which make up a massive proportion of bank holdings -- that helped weaken Japan's banks to the state they are currently in. More Japanese, however, are likely to simply stash it away under their futons, an increasingly popular trend in the country. The amount of currency in circulation continues to climb -- 10.6 percent in July from a year earlier -- and the new policies will hardly staunch the flow. Any money stored away will not only be unavailable for the new investments that the moribund Japanese economy so desperately needs, but is also likely to help foster a rise in petty crime simply from the extra currency sloshing around in people's pockets and homes. So long as the hemorrhaging from the financial system is slow and steady, this new policy might actually achieve some good. Japan's economy, particularly now that Koizumi has abandoned any real pretense to reform it, is in terminal decline. Policies such as this one do nothing to slow, much less reverse, that decline. What they do accomplish, however, is removing factors that would cause systemic immediate collapse. In this case, the policy serves to prick the banking system, allowing funds to slowly bleed away. In time total deposits will be much smaller -- whether from capital flight or subzero interest rates -- and the banking sector's stability will no longer command global attention. ___________________________________________________________________ <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< SEND THIS TO A FRIEND! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Did you like this analysis? Then forward it to a friend! Got this from a friend? Get your own by becoming a member! http://www.stratfor.com/house/about/subscriptions/about.php <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ___________________________________________________________________ CONTACTS AND CUSTOMER SERVICE: STRATFOR 700 Lavaca, Suite 405 Austin, TX 78701 Phone: 202-204-2580 Internet: http://www.stratfor.com/ Email: info@stratfor.com SIGN-UP: To add or remove your e-mail address from our Global Intelligence Report e-mail newsletter go to: http://www.stratfor.com/house/about/member_service.php Under Section 2, enter your membership user name and password and click "Edit Account Information". Next, change or remove your e-mail address from your account membership information and click "Send Info" to update your membership profile. ADVERTISE: For information on advertising in this email or any section of the STRATFOR website, please email us at advertising@stratfor.com ==================================================== (c) 2002 Strategic Forecasting LLC. All rights reserved. - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 11 Aug 2002 11:05:53 -0500 From: Chris Dempsey Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] investment club This is a multi-part message in MIME format. - --Boundary_(ID_7MNPvDD9wecQRzIl5tf+yw) Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Please tell us about your investment club. -----Original Message----- From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of Chazmoore@aol.com Sent: Friday, August 09, 2002 8:33 PM To: canslim@lists.xmission.com Subject: [CANSLIM] Patterson Dental PDCO As an off shoot of Mike Gibbon's excellent inquiry concerning XRAY we found one of their competitors, PDCO, which appears to be building the right side of a cup. I quickly put together a one page overview of the basic fundamentals/technicals and sent it to the members of my investment club. I know several club members will give it a review and respond within a few days. If you would like a copy of my summary report, let me know and I will send it to you off line. I am reluctant to post the report since I do not wish to be accused of recommending a stock to the public at large. Charley - --Boundary_(ID_7MNPvDD9wecQRzIl5tf+yw) Content-type: text/html; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Please tell us about your investment club.
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of Chazmoore@aol.com
Sent: Friday, August 09, 2002 8:33 PM
To: canslim@lists.xmission.com
Subject: [CANSLIM] Patterson Dental PDCO

As an off shoot of Mike Gibbon's excellent inquiry concerning XRAY we found one of their competitors, PDCO, which appears to be building the right side of a cup. I quickly put together a one page overview of the basic fundamentals/technicals and sent it to the members of my investment club. I know several club members will give it a review and respond within a few days. If you would like a copy of my summary report, let me know and I will send it to you off line.
I am reluctant to post the report since I do not wish to be accused of recommending a stock to the public at large.
Charley
- --Boundary_(ID_7MNPvDD9wecQRzIl5tf+yw)-- - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 11 Aug 2002 12:22:20 -0400 From: "Tom Worley" Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] investment club This is a multi-part message in MIME format. - ------=_NextPart_000_0050_01C24131.BD92E980 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Chris, and Chazmoore, might I suggest this is sufficiently off topic to = discuss in private? - ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Chris Dempsey=20 To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20 Sent: Sunday, August 11, 2002 12:05 PM Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] investment club Please tell us about your investment club. -----Original Message----- From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com = [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of Chazmoore@aol.com Sent: Friday, August 09, 2002 8:33 PM To: canslim@lists.xmission.com Subject: [CANSLIM] Patterson Dental PDCO As an off shoot of Mike Gibbon's excellent inquiry concerning XRAY we = found one of their competitors, PDCO, which appears to be building the = right side of a cup. I quickly put together a one page overview of the = basic fundamentals/technicals and sent it to the members of my = investment club. I know several club members will give it a review and = respond within a few days. If you would like a copy of my summary = report, let me know and I will send it to you off line.=20 I am reluctant to post the report since I do not wish to be accused of = recommending a stock to the public at large.=20 Charley=20 - ------=_NextPart_000_0050_01C24131.BD92E980 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Chris, and Chazmoore, might I suggest this is = sufficiently=20 off topic to discuss in private?
 
----- Original Message -----=20
From: Chris Dempsey =
Sent: Sunday, August 11, 2002 12:05 PM
Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] investment club

Please tell us about your investment=20 club.
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-canslim@lists.xmis= sion.com=20 [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of Chazmoore@aol.com
Sent: = Friday,=20 August 09, 2002 8:33 PM
To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=
Subject:=20 [CANSLIM] Patterson Dental PDCO

As an off shoot of Mike Gibbon's = excellent=20 inquiry concerning XRAY we found one of their competitors, PDCO, which = appears=20 to be building the right side of a cup. I quickly put together a one = page=20 overview of the basic fundamentals/technicals and sent it to the = members of my=20 investment club. I know several club members will give it a review and = respond=20 within a few days. If you would like a copy of my summary report, let = me know=20 and I will send it to you off line.
I am reluctant to post the = report=20 since I do not wish to be accused of recommending a stock to the = public at=20 large.
Charley
- ------=_NextPart_000_0050_01C24131.BD92E980-- - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 11 Aug 2002 11:36:12 -0500 From: Gene Ricci Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] investment club This is a multi-part message in MIME format. - ------=_NextPart_000_022C_01C2412B.4B7D3090 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Tom, you're a silver tongued devil....=20 BTW, why don't you like banks? Gene ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Tom Worley=20 To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20 Sent: Sunday, August 11, 2002 11:22 AM Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] investment club Chris, and Chazmoore, might I suggest this is sufficiently off topic = to discuss in private? ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Chris Dempsey=20 To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20 Sent: Sunday, August 11, 2002 12:05 PM Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] investment club Please tell us about your investment club. -----Original Message----- From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com = [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of Chazmoore@aol.com Sent: Friday, August 09, 2002 8:33 PM To: canslim@lists.xmission.com Subject: [CANSLIM] Patterson Dental PDCO As an off shoot of Mike Gibbon's excellent inquiry concerning XRAY = we found one of their competitors, PDCO, which appears to be building = the right side of a cup. I quickly put together a one page overview of = the basic fundamentals/technicals and sent it to the members of my = investment club. I know several club members will give it a review and = respond within a few days. If you would like a copy of my summary = report, let me know and I will send it to you off line.=20 I am reluctant to post the report since I do not wish to be accused = of recommending a stock to the public at large.=20 Charley - ------=_NextPart_000_022C_01C2412B.4B7D3090 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Tom, you're a silver tongued devil.... =
 
BTW, why don't you like = banks?
Gene
 
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Tom=20 Worley
Sent: Sunday, August 11, 2002 = 11:22=20 AM
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] = investment=20 club

Chris, and Chazmoore, might I suggest this is=20 sufficiently off topic to discuss in private?
 
----- Original Message -----=20
From: Chris Dempsey =
Sent: Sunday, August 11, 2002 12:05 PM
Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] investment club

Please tell us about your investment=20 club.
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-canslim@lists.xmis= sion.com=20 [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of Chazmoore@aol.com
Sent:=20 Friday, August 09, 2002 8:33 PM
To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=
Subject:=20 [CANSLIM] Patterson Dental PDCO

As an off shoot of Mike = Gibbon's excellent=20 inquiry concerning XRAY we found one of their competitors, PDCO, = which=20 appears to be building the right side of a cup. I quickly put = together a one=20 page overview of the basic fundamentals/technicals and sent it to = the=20 members of my investment club. I know several club members will give = it a=20 review and respond within a few days. If you would like a copy of my = summary=20 report, let me know and I will send it to you off line.
I am = reluctant=20 to post the report since I do not wish to be accused of recommending = a stock=20 to the public at large.
Charley=20
- ------=_NextPart_000_022C_01C2412B.4B7D3090-- - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 11 Aug 2002 12:34:23 -0400 From: "Tom Worley" Subject: Personal Preferences (Re: [CANSLIM] investment club) This is a multi-part message in MIME format. - ------=_NextPart_000_0078_01C24133.6C51E880 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Gene, Banks are among a number of industry groups where the market has taught = me I simply don't understand them, nor can adequately value or assess = importance of developments, or finances. So I stick to industries where I think I can understand the company and = what they do. - ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Gene Ricci=20 To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20 Sent: Sunday, August 11, 2002 12:36 PM Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] investment club Tom, you're a silver tongued devil....=20 BTW, why don't you like banks? Gene ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Tom Worley=20 To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20 Sent: Sunday, August 11, 2002 11:22 AM Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] investment club Chris, and Chazmoore, might I suggest this is sufficiently off topic = to discuss in private? ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Chris Dempsey=20 To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20 Sent: Sunday, August 11, 2002 12:05 PM Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] investment club Please tell us about your investment club. -----Original Message----- From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com = [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of Chazmoore@aol.com Sent: Friday, August 09, 2002 8:33 PM To: canslim@lists.xmission.com Subject: [CANSLIM] Patterson Dental PDCO As an off shoot of Mike Gibbon's excellent inquiry concerning XRAY = we found one of their competitors, PDCO, which appears to be building = the right side of a cup. I quickly put together a one page overview of = the basic fundamentals/technicals and sent it to the members of my = investment club. I know several club members will give it a review and = respond within a few days. If you would like a copy of my summary = report, let me know and I will send it to you off line.=20 I am reluctant to post the report since I do not wish to be accused = of recommending a stock to the public at large.=20 Charley=20 - ------=_NextPart_000_0078_01C24133.6C51E880 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi Gene,
 
Banks are among a number of industry groups = where the=20 market has taught me I simply don't understand them, nor can adequately = value or=20 assess importance of developments, or finances.
 
So I stick to industries where I think I can = understand=20 the company and what they do.
 
----- Original Message -----=20
From: Gene Ricci =
Sent: Sunday, August 11, 2002 12:36 PM
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] investment club

Tom, you're a silver tongued devil.... =
 
BTW, why don't you like = banks?
Gene
 
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Tom=20 Worley
Sent: Sunday, August 11, 2002 = 11:22=20 AM
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] = investment=20 club

Chris, and Chazmoore, might I suggest this is=20 sufficiently off topic to discuss in private?
 
----- Original Message -----=20
From: Chris Dempsey =
Sent: Sunday, August 11, 2002 12:05 PM
Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] investment club

Please tell us about your investment=20 club.
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-canslim@lists.xmis= sion.com=20 [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of Chazmoore@aol.com
Sent:=20 Friday, August 09, 2002 8:33 PM
To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=
Subject:=20 [CANSLIM] Patterson Dental PDCO

As an off shoot of Mike = Gibbon's excellent=20 inquiry concerning XRAY we found one of their competitors, PDCO, = which=20 appears to be building the right side of a cup. I quickly put = together a one=20 page overview of the basic fundamentals/technicals and sent it to = the=20 members of my investment club. I know several club members will give = it a=20 review and respond within a few days. If you would like a copy of my = summary=20 report, let me know and I will send it to you off line.
I am = reluctant=20 to post the report since I do not wish to be accused of recommending = a stock=20 to the public at large.
Charley=20
- ------=_NextPart_000_0078_01C24133.6C51E880-- - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ End of canslim-digest V2 #2778 ****************************** To unsubscribe to canslim-digest, send an email to "majordomo@xmission.com" with "unsubscribe canslim-digest" in the body of the message. For information on digests or retrieving files and old messages send "help" to the same address. Do not use quotes in your message.