From: owner-canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com (canslim-digest) To: canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com Subject: canslim-digest V2 #2951 Reply-To: canslim Sender: owner-canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com Errors-To: owner-canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com Precedence: bulk Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-No-Archive: yes canslim-digest Monday, September 23 2002 Volume 02 : Number 2951 In this issue: Re: [CANSLIM] Is the board up Re: [CANSLIM] Is the board up [CANSLIM] test - disregard [CANSLIM] CANSLIM Hunting List 09/20/02 [CANSLIM] IBD Article on IGT [CANSLIM] "M" Re: [CANSLIM] IBD Article on IGT Re: [CANSLIM] IBD Article on IGT Re: [CANSLIM] "M" Re: [CANSLIM] CANSLIM Hunting List 09/20/02 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2002 22:23:51 -0400 From: "Tom Worley" Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Is the board up it's working, Charles, just no one posting anything. - ----- Original Message ----- From: "charles wilfong" <10charles@email.msn.com> To: Sent: Sunday, September 22, 2002 10:15 PM Subject: [CANSLIM] Is the board up Is the board up. I have not been receiving messages since this one. - ---- Original Message ----- From: "James Bond" To: Sent: Saturday, September 21, 2002 10:19 PM Subject: shorting: was RE: [CANSLIM] COCO - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2002 21:28:24 -0500 From: "Norman" Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Is the board up I think there is an inverse relationship between the traffic in this forum and how well the M is doing Yet another psychological indicator. Norm - ----- Original Message ----- From: "charles wilfong" <10charles@email.msn.com> To: Sent: Sunday, September 22, 2002 9:15 PM Subject: [CANSLIM] Is the board up > Is the board up. I have not been receiving messages since this one. > > ---- Original Message ----- > From: "James Bond" > To: > Sent: Saturday, September 21, 2002 10:19 PM > Subject: shorting: was RE: [CANSLIM] COCO > > > > It's interesting that a group focusing on the > > relatively conservative method of CANSLIM has started > > to discuss short strategies. Is it a sign that we're > > close to a bottom? > > > > My 2 cents on shorting: 1. Shorting is hard; 2. > > Shorting is harder in the third year of a bear market; > > 3. Shorting is even harder when short interest is > > approaching the highest level in 5 years. I have > > shorted a few stocks with some success last year. This > > year I had much less success and was so frustrated I > > have not shorted anything since June. > > > > Yes, the inverse of CANSLIM would be a good starting > > point for considering a short - but only a starting > > point. A successful short requires perfect timing, > > because the stock market is designed against short > > sellers. Not only one needs to catch the correct entry > > point, it also has to be entered during an uptick. The > > problem is, using the inverse CANSLIM type pivot point > > will never allow an entry because stocks will crash > > through the "pivot point" without generating an > > uptick. And those do generate upticks close to ideal > > entry points are usually the wrong stocks to short. > > > > For me, best short candidates are very different than > > the reverse of long candidates. The safest shorts are > > the climax runs (I haven't seen these in a long time). > > In those cases the day of the top usually jumps out in > > the chart. The reverse situation, a climax selloff > > bottom, is very very hard to determine. The second > > safest shorts are failed breakouts. These are not > > inverted CwH's but the normal CwH's with broken > > handles or failed to hold new highs after BO. Shorting > > off continuation patterns such as inverted CwH > > patterns requires a lot of skill. > > > > __________________________________________________ > > Do you Yahoo!? > > New DSL Internet Access from SBC & Yahoo! > > http://sbc.yahoo.com > > > > - > > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. > > > > - > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. > > - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2002 06:41:29 -0400 From: "Tom Worley" Subject: [CANSLIM] test - disregard Tom Worley stkguru@bellsouth.net AIM: TexWorley - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2002 10:10:46 -0500 From: "Katherine Malm" Subject: [CANSLIM] CANSLIM Hunting List 09/20/02 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. - ------=_NextPart_000_21F4_01C262E9.7BBFBAE0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi All, I've uploaded the latest CANSLIM Hunting list to: http://WallStreet-LLC.com/canslim/CANSLIMHunting092002.xls ( a bit slow = to load) http://WallStreet-LLC.com/canslim/CANSLIMHunting092002.zip ( a zipped = version for download) In order to make it to the list, the stock had to have a forward growth = rate of at least 15%, Price at least 6, Avg Daily Vol at least 30K, RS = at least 60, no more than 15% below the 50 day SMA, and at or above the = 200 day SMA. This is what I consider to be "bare bones" requirements for = CANSLIM quality stocks.Other information included is industry name = (slightly different than DGO's names, but close enough!), price, avg = vol, and links to graphs and due diligence sites on the internet. If = you'd like to look at last month's hunting list, you will find it at: http://WallStreet-LLC.com/canslim/CANSLIMHunting082302.xls or http://WallStreet-LLC.com/canslim/CANSLIMHunting082302.zip This month there are 332 names, down 127 names from the list I posted = last month. The decrease certainly reflects the failed rally which = posted the final distribution day in early September, shortly after I = posted the previous list. This month, 187 names fell from the list, 61 = new names came on board and 287 names are repeats. Though the list of = candidates tends to rotate, you have to be ready for any intermediate = term rally in order to make money on the long side. Who knows? One day = the Bear might actually be over and that short Bear rally might just = turn into a sustainable intermediate term move. If the market pulls a = long sideways as I've always believed it will (as in '65-'80), you'll = need to be well practiced at taking advantage of shorter rallies from a = list of rotating candidates. Happy Hunting, Katherine - ------=_NextPart_000_21F4_01C262E9.7BBFBAE0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi All,
 
I've uploaded the latest CANSLIM Hunting list to:
 
http:= //WallStreet-LLC.com/canslim/CANSLIMHunting092002.xls=20 ( a bit slow to load)
http:= //WallStreet-LLC.com/canslim/CANSLIMHunting092002.zip (=20 a zipped version for download)
 
In order to make it to the list, the stock had to have a forward = growth=20 rate of at least 15%, Price at least 6, Avg Daily Vol at least 30K, RS = at least=20 60, no more than 15% below the 50 day SMA, and at or above the 200 day = SMA. This=20 is what I consider to be "bare bones" requirements for CANSLIM quality=20 stocks.Other information included is industry name (slightly different = than=20 DGO's names, but close enough!), price, avg vol, and  links to = graphs and=20 due diligence sites on the internet. If you'd like to look at last = month's=20 hunting list, you will find it at:
 
http:= //WallStreet-LLC.com/canslim/CANSLIMHunting082302.xls or
http:= //WallStreet-LLC.com/canslim/CANSLIMHunting082302.zip
 
This month there are 332 names, down 127 names from the list I = posted last=20 month. The decrease certainly reflects the failed rally which posted the = final=20 distribution day in early September, shortly after I posted the previous = list.=20 This month, 187 names fell from the list, 61 new names came on board and = 287=20 names are repeats. Though the list of candidates tends to rotate, you = have to be=20 ready for any intermediate term rally in order to make money on the long = side.=20 Who knows? One day the Bear might actually be over and that short Bear = rally=20 might just turn into a sustainable intermediate term move. If the market = pulls a=20 long sideways as I've always believed it will (as in '65-'80), you'll = need to be=20 well practiced at taking advantage of shorter rallies from a list of = rotating=20 candidates.
 
Happy Hunting,
Katherine
- ------=_NextPart_000_21F4_01C262E9.7BBFBAE0-- - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2002 14:09:42 -0700 From: "Chris Mc" Subject: [CANSLIM] IBD Article on IGT This is a multi-part message in MIME format. - ------=_NextPart_000_0007_01C26241.B28D82D0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello to All. Can someone take a look at IGT's chart. Just trying to interpret = article in IBD on 9/11 re: IGT "clearing a base started in late = December" and "bursting out of an 8 l/2 month base" - "volume finishing = 50% above its 50 day average" to close at $68.32... In order to CLEAR a base, wouldn't price have to exceed $71.95 which was = high on 12/27/01? =20 Thanks to all Chris Mc - ------=_NextPart_000_0007_01C26241.B28D82D0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hello to = All.
 
Can someone take a look = at IGT's=20 chart.  Just trying to interpret article in IBD on 9/11 re: IGT = "clearing a=20 base started in late December" and "bursting out of an 8 l/2 month base" = - -=20 "volume finishing 50% above its 50 day average" to close at=20 $68.32...
 
In order to CLEAR a = base, wouldn't=20 price have to exceed $71.95 which was high on = 12/27/01?  
 
Thanks to = all
 
Chris = Mc
- ------=_NextPart_000_0007_01C26241.B28D82D0-- - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2002 20:42:20 -0400 From: "Tom Worley" Subject: [CANSLIM] "M" Well, NASDOG, I mean NASDAQ, managed to do it. Not only traded to a new low under the one set 8/5/02, it also managed to close nearly at the low of the day. It had company, tho, with the Naz 100 doing the same thing. The Russell 2000 didn't quite beat its 7/24 low on an intraday basis, but sure managed to take it out on a closing price basis. The rest of the major indexes look like they need a few more days of catch up, but are headed in the same direction. Will be interesting to see what the Feds say tomorrow. Tom Worley stkguru@bellsouth.net AIM: TexWorley - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2002 20:49:48 -0400 From: "Tom Worley" Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] IBD Article on IGT This is a multi-part message in MIME format. - ------=_NextPart_000_005F_01C26342.C1465AC0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Chris, just a guess on my part, but looks to me like the "base" they are = referring to is a volatile c&h, and they are using the flat line base = that ran from 1/1/02 to 1/24/02 to establish a pivot point, rather the = the high that immediately preceded the flat line base. I am a little surprised they would get excited about volume 150% of ADV, = rather than at least 200%, and in this "M" want more like 300 or 400%. Because of the time that has already passed, I might have also = disregarded the high set 12/27/01. - ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Chris Mc=20 To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20 Sent: Sunday, September 22, 2002 5:09 PM Subject: [CANSLIM] IBD Article on IGT Hello to All. Can someone take a look at IGT's chart. Just trying to interpret = article in IBD on 9/11 re: IGT "clearing a base started in late = December" and "bursting out of an 8 l/2 month base" - "volume finishing = 50% above its 50 day average" to close at $68.32... In order to CLEAR a base, wouldn't price have to exceed $71.95 which was = high on 12/27/01? =20 Thanks to all Chris Mc - ------=_NextPart_000_005F_01C26342.C1465AC0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Chris, just a guess on my part, but looks to me = like the=20 "base" they are referring to is a volatile c&h, and they are using = the flat=20 line base that ran from 1/1/02 to 1/24/02 to establish a pivot point, = rather the=20 the high that immediately preceded the flat line base.
 
I am a little surprised they would get excited = about=20 volume 150% of ADV, rather than at least 200%, and in this "M" want more = like=20 300 or 400%.
 
Because of the time that has already passed, I = might have=20 also disregarded the high set 12/27/01.
 
----- Original Message -----=20
From: Chris = Mc
Sent: Sunday, September 22, 2002 5:09 PM
Subject: [CANSLIM] IBD Article on IGT

Hello to = All.
 
Can someone take a look = at IGT's=20 chart.  Just trying to interpret article in IBD on 9/11 re: IGT = "clearing a=20 base started in late December" and "bursting out of an 8 l/2 month base" = - -=20 "volume finishing 50% above its 50 day average" to close at=20 $68.32...
 
In order to CLEAR a = base, wouldn't=20 price have to exceed $71.95 which was high on = 12/27/01?  
 
Thanks to = all
 
Chris = Mc
- ------=_NextPart_000_005F_01C26342.C1465AC0-- - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2002 18:31:00 -0700 From: "Chris Mc" Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] IBD Article on IGT This is a multi-part message in MIME format. - ------=_NextPart_000_0008_01C2632F.5DCC2D70 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Thanks Tom - I see the point you are making. =20 Chris Mc ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Tom Worley=20 To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20 Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 5:49 PM Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] IBD Article on IGT Chris, just a guess on my part, but looks to me like the "base" they = are referring to is a volatile c&h, and they are using the flat line = base that ran from 1/1/02 to 1/24/02 to establish a pivot point, rather = the the high that immediately preceded the flat line base. I am a little surprised they would get excited about volume 150% of = ADV, rather than at least 200%, and in this "M" want more like 300 or = 400%. Because of the time that has already passed, I might have also = disregarded the high set 12/27/01. ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Chris Mc=20 To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20 Sent: Sunday, September 22, 2002 5:09 PM Subject: [CANSLIM] IBD Article on IGT Hello to All. Can someone take a look at IGT's chart. Just trying to interpret = article in IBD on 9/11 re: IGT "clearing a base started in late = December" and "bursting out of an 8 l/2 month base" - "volume finishing = 50% above its 50 day average" to close at $68.32... In order to CLEAR a base, wouldn't price have to exceed $71.95 which = was high on 12/27/01? =20 Thanks to all Chris Mc - ------=_NextPart_000_0008_01C2632F.5DCC2D70 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Thanks Tom - I see the = point you=20 are making. 
 
 
Chris Mc
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Tom=20 Worley
Sent: Monday, September 23, = 2002 5:49=20 PM
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] IBD = Article on=20 IGT

Chris, just a guess on my part, but looks to = me like the=20 "base" they are referring to is a volatile c&h, and they are using = the=20 flat line base that ran from 1/1/02 to 1/24/02 to establish a pivot = point,=20 rather the the high that immediately preceded the flat line = base.
 
I am a little surprised they would get excited = about=20 volume 150% of ADV, rather than at least 200%, and in this "M" want = more like=20 300 or 400%.
 
Because of the time that has already passed, I = might=20 have also disregarded the high set 12/27/01.
 
----- Original Message -----=20
From: Chris = Mc
Sent: Sunday, September 22, 2002 5:09 PM
Subject: [CANSLIM] IBD Article on IGT

Hello to = All.
 
Can someone take a = look at IGT's=20 chart.  Just trying to interpret article in IBD on 9/11 re: IGT = "clearing=20 a base started in late December" and "bursting out of an 8 l/2 month = base" -=20 "volume finishing 50% above its 50 day average" to close at=20 $68.32...
 
In order to CLEAR a = base,=20 wouldn't price have to exceed $71.95 which was high on=20 12/27/01?  
 
Thanks to = all
 
Chris=20 Mc
- ------=_NextPart_000_0008_01C2632F.5DCC2D70-- - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2002 21:49:38 -0400 From: "Dan Forant" Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] "M" The Feds will say gobblygook, and no rate cut. They will need space to cut if things really get nasty. This M=shorters paradise, shorts or puts. DanF - ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tom Worley" To: "CANSLIM" Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 8:42 PM Subject: [CANSLIM] "M" > Well, NASDOG, I mean NASDAQ, managed to do it. Not only traded to a new low > under the one set 8/5/02, it also managed to close nearly at the low of the > day. It had company, tho, with the Naz 100 doing the same thing. The Russell > 2000 didn't quite beat its 7/24 low on an intraday basis, but sure managed > to take it out on a closing price basis. The rest of the major indexes look > like they need a few more days of catch up, but are headed in the same > direction. Will be interesting to see what the Feds say tomorrow. > > Tom Worley > stkguru@bellsouth.net > AIM: TexWorley > > > > - > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. > - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2002 23:28:59 EDT From: Sally5455@aol.com Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] CANSLIM Hunting List 09/20/02 - --part1_a6.2ccc0c32.2ac135fb_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 9/23/2002 10:13:46 AM Central Daylight Time, kmalm@earthlink.net writes: > In order to make it to the list, the stock had to have a forward growth rate > of at least 15%, Price at least 6, Avg Daily Vol at least 30K, RS at least > 60, no more than 15% below the 50 day SMA, and at or above the 200 day SMA. > This is what I consider to be "bare bones" requirements for CANSLIM quality > stocks. I'm confused with the price and avg daily volume numbers. They don't match what I learned from the HTMMIS and IBD. Is this modified Can Slim? Elmer - --part1_a6.2ccc0c32.2ac135fb_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 9/23/2002 10:13:46 AM Central Daylight Time, kmalm@earthlink.net writes:


In order to make it to the list, the stock had to have a forward growth rate of at least 15%, Price at least 6, Avg Daily Vol at least 30K, RS at least 60, no more than 15% below the 50 day SMA, and at or above the 200 day SMA. This is what I consider to be "bare bones" requirements for CANSLIM quality stocks.


I'm confused with the price and avg daily volume numbers. They don't match what I learned from the HTMMIS and IBD. Is this modified Can Slim?

Elmer
- --part1_a6.2ccc0c32.2ac135fb_boundary-- - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ End of canslim-digest V2 #2951 ****************************** To unsubscribe to canslim-digest, send an email to "majordomo@xmission.com" with "unsubscribe canslim-digest" in the body of the message. For information on digests or retrieving files and old messages send "help" to the same address. Do not use quotes in your message.