From: owner-canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com (canslim-digest) To: canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com Subject: canslim-digest V2 #3161 Reply-To: canslim Sender: owner-canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com Errors-To: owner-canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com Precedence: bulk Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-No-Archive: yes canslim-digest Friday, February 7 2003 Volume 02 : Number 3161 In this issue: RE:POSS (was: [CANSLIM] where is everybody?) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2003 13:15:52 -0600 From: "Katherine Malm" Subject: RE:POSS (was: [CANSLIM] where is everybody?) This is a multi-part message in MIME format. - ------=_NextPart_000_0019_01C2CEAB.0A70A880 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_001_001A_01C2CEAB.0A70A880" - ------=_NextPart_001_001A_01C2CEAB.0A70A880 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Ed, Here's a devil's advocate point of view on POSS-- In reviewing the industry, I noticed that overall, nearly 2/3 of the industry has RS<60 and is more than 5% below the 200dMA. A quick chart review of stocks in the industry with Price>=6 and ADV>=30000 (see list below) gives me a view of an industry that has stalled out at the very least and rolling over at worst. Recent sink holes such as ICUI and breakdowns or failed breakouts such as BLUD, ANSI, OSUR or BSTE don't reflect well on the group. It's a big industry with a diverse group of companies, so I would be inclined to defer to POSS's direct competitors for a more specific view (BSX, GDT), but nonetheless, I think leaders such as POSS will be the last to rollover and so would view any breakout with suspicion. Katherine Symbol RS CEP 96 POSS 96 BSTE 96 OSUR 95 RTIX 95 BSX 94 BLUD 93 SYNO 91 NOVT 91 MATK 88 VIVO 86 ANSI 83 IMDC 83 ZMH 80 STJ 77 CYBX 75 SYK 72 RMD 72 HGR 68 BCR 63 MMSI 62 KNSY 60 ACL 58 RESP 57 EW 54 BONZ 53 MDT 51 THOR 49 CYTC 45 GDT 45 AMMD 44 MNTR 44 BMET 39 SRDX 39 GB 36 IART 36 KYPH 35 MIL 32 LCBM 31 CRL 30 WMGI 28 DP 26 PLL 26 SERO 26 ICUI 25 BAX 24 CBM 17 CLSR 15 THER 13 CPTS 6 -----Original Message----- From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of Edward W. Gjertsen II Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 11:10 AM To: canslim@lists.xmission.com Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] where is everybody? When the market starts to roll over a little - there is little to talk about. BUT - we are seeing some very interesting setups. POSS is one. We own this at 18.40, we are looking to add to it if it forms a handle here. There are probably 5-10 more stocks that we are looking at. So, keep at your research. Looking for some help here. I participate in a live webcast called the "Look Ahead." It's on tonight, Friday February 7, 2003 at 4:30PM central time. We talk about the markets, what's reports are coming up next week, and my favorite part, what stocks we like. I am highlighting POSS tonight. Your commentary regarding the show would be greatly appreciated! You can click on to: WebFn or MSN Money - CNBC or Fidelity.com - Videos @ Fidelity - WebFn Live Video News Have a great weekend everyone. Ed Gjertsen II ed@macktracks.com Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. -----Original Message----- From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com] On Behalf Of Larry Worden Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 9:34 AM To: canslim@lists.xmission.com Subject: [CANSLIM] where is everybody? Is there something wrong with my Internet or is everybody gown? Larry -----Original Message----- From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of Tom Worley Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 8:22 PM To: canslim@lists.xmission.com Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Taking Offense maybe it is easier for me because of nearly 7 years on the board and seeing how much Jeff stays in the background, but Ed's point is on target, be careful about overreacting before you have all the facts. Good lesson for life, even better one for investing. Jeff already invests a lot of his time and effort, and probably money, in providing this forum. I am willing to bet the very last thing he is interested in doing is having to monitor or censor every post. ----- Original Message ----- From: NANCY POLCARO To: canslim Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2003 12:50 AM Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Taking Offense I don't want to get in hot water here but Jeff did ask everyone what they thought about the whole situation -and Jans just told him. I'm sure if he knew it was a technical problem and not the way the new list was going to function, his response would have been different. Just a thought Nancy ----- Original Message ----- From: Tom Worley Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 9:42 PM To: canslim@lists.xmission.com Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Taking Offense I agree with Jeff's reply, I guessed the notice I got (same as jans) was related to the new software, and just emailed Jeff directly about it. I had already seen my post show up in the usual quick fashion, so knew it was not being held. Besides, as Ed says, it's Jeff's list, and his choice and decision on switching. It's not up to a majority vote, those that don't like it don't have to continue. And his ability to monitor, control even when necessary, has not only helped snuff out the few flames we have had over the years, but also makes it possible for this to remain an unmoderated board. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Edward W. Gjertsen II" To: Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 6:15 PM Subject: [CANSLIM] Taking Offense I think first and foremost we all need to remember that this is Jeff's world: his list, not ours. We have the privilege to add our thoughts and comments here because Jeff allows it. If Jeff wanted to "screen" responses, it would be his prerogative. This is a classic case of an individual overreacting prior to getting all the facts: A bad habit good traders/investors should stay away from. I applaud Jeff in his efforts and again, if it wasn't for him, we all would be just reading IBD at face value. (Ooh - that sent shivers down my spine). So, thank you Jeff! Ed Gjertsen II ed@macktracks.com Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. -----Original Message----- From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com] On Behalf Of Jeff Salisbury Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 4:36 PM To: Spencer48@aol.com Cc: canslim@lists.xmission.com Subject: [CANSLIM] More on the new list-server software Spencer48@aol.com wrote: >Jeff (if this is you): > > Why is my post being upheld for so long? It is now nearly 5 PM, a day >later. > > Also, I didn't know that the CANSLIM forum is a "restricted list". > > And my letter "...being held until the list moderator can review it for >approval" sounds like something a CENSOR would love. Every time I write in >the future to the CANSLIM forum, am I now going to have to go through a >gatekeeper? > > If this is an example of the new address you were talking about, I don't >like it. As a matter of fact, if I had known this could be the possible >fallout, I wouldn't have agreed so readily to the new ISP. > > I liked the free interchange of ideas in the CANSLIM forum, but I'm not >sure that I'll like this new wrinkle (as a matter of fact, I'm pretty certain >that I won't): It's like asking my parents for the keys to the car-and >waiting a day or so later for their reply. > >jans > Hi Jans, Hold your horses there partner! ;-) It isn't what you think... ;-) What I've done is subscribe the new list-server's email address to the old canslim's distribution list. I did this so that current messages will distribute through the new list-serve. Currently, I'm the only one that is subscribed to the new list-server, everybody else is still subscribed to the old list-server and the server is still working as it always has. You and all other subscribers do not need to do anything differently at this point. The message you received that your posting is awaiting approval is the new list-serve telling you that your posting is being held for approval (the old list-server had already sent out your message). Other people who have posted in the last 24-48 hours have seen the same thing. I've subsequently turned the notification message off to help allivate the confusion. Two things to keep in mind regarding your posting: 1) It was delivered immediatly to everybody via the old list-server and was not held up in any way to the group. 2) The old list-server delivered a copy of your message to the new list-server. I'm currently the only one subscribed to the new list-server. However, the new list-server didn't recognize you has a current member (because you aren't subscribed to the new list-server yet) and held up your message to be approved. It then sent you a message saying your posting was being held for approval. I don't know if this helped explain things or if it confused you more. Regardless, just keep these things in mind: 1) The same old canslim list-server is still in place and will be until I indicate otherwise. 2) I won't make the transition unless or until: a) I'm confident that the new list-server will give us equal or better service. b) The transition can be done in a smooth manner. 3) I will continue experiementing in ways that will not disrupt the operations of the old list-server, but in ways that may raise questions or cause confusion from time to time. You're not the only person to be confused by my experimentation. 4) I may conclude in the end to not make the switch. However, at this point I am leaning to making the switch. 5) Once I'm satisfied the move will be good, I'll throw the switch and we'll all move over to the new list-server en-mass. I won't do this without letting everyone know a date and a time well ahead of time. Regards, Jeff - canslim admin/owner - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. - ------=_NextPart_001_001A_01C2CEAB.0A70A880 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi Ed,
 
Here's a devil's advocate point of = view on=20 POSS--
 
In reviewing the industry, I = noticed that=20 overall, nearly 2/3 of the industry has RS<60 and is more than 5% = below the=20 200dMA. A quick chart review of stocks in the industry with = Price>=3D6 and=20 ADV>=3D30000 (see list below) gives me a view of an industry = that has=20 stalled out at the very least and rolling over at worst. Recent sink = holes such=20 as ICUI and breakdowns or failed breakouts such as  BLUD, ANSI, = OSUR or=20 BSTE don't reflect well on the group.  It's a big industry with a = diverse=20 group of companies, so I would be inclined to defer to POSS's direct = competitors=20 for a more specific view (BSX, GDT), but nonetheless, I think leaders = such as=20 POSS will be the last to rollover and so would view any breakout with=20 suspicion.
 
Katherine
 
 
Symbol CEP POSS BSTE OSUR RTIX BSX BLUD SYNO NOVT MATK VIVO ANSI IMDC ZMH STJ CYBX SYK RMD HGR BCR MMSI KNSY ACL RESP EW BONZ MDT THOR CYTC GDT AMMD MNTR BMET SRDX GB IART KYPH MIL LCBM CRL WMGI DP PLL SERO ICUI BAX CBM CLSR THER CPTS
RS
96
96
96
95
95
94
93
91
91
88
86
83
83
80
77
75
72
72
68
63
62
60
58
57
54
53
51
49
45
45
44
44
39
39
36
36
35
32
31
30
28
26
26
26
25
24
17
15
13
6
-----Original Message-----
From:=20 owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com=20 [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of Edward W. = Gjertsen II
Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 11:10 = AM
To:=20 canslim@lists.xmission.com
Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] where is=20 everybody?

When the market starts to roll = over a=20 little – there is little to talk about.  BUT – we are = seeing some very=20 interesting setups.  POSS is one.  We own this at 18.40, we = are=20 looking to add to it if it forms a handle here.  There are = probably 5-10=20 more stocks that we are looking at. So, keep at your=20 research.

 

Looking for some help = here.  I=20 participate in a live webcast called the “Look = Ahead.”  It’s on tonight,=20 Friday = February 7,=20 2003 at=20 4:30PM central time.  We talk about the markets, = what’s=20 reports are coming up next week, and my favorite part, what stocks we=20 like.  I am highlighting POSS tonight. Your commentary regarding = the show=20 would be greatly appreciated! You can click on to:

 

WebFn = or MSN = Money -=20 CNBC or Fidelity.com=20 - Videos @ Fidelity – WebFn Live Video = News

 

Have a great weekend=20 everyone.

 

 

Ed Gjertsen = II

ed@macktracks.com

=

 

 

Confidentiality Notice: This = e-mail=20 message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the = intended=20 recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged = information. =20 Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is = prohibited. =20 If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by = reply=20 e-mail and destroy all copies of the original=20 message.

 

-----Original=20 Message-----
From:=20 owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com = [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]=20 On Behalf Of Larry=20 Worden
Sent: = Friday, February=20 07, 2003 9:34 AM
To:=20 canslim@lists.xmission.com
Subject: [CANSLIM] where is=20 everybody?

 

Is = there something=20 wrong with my Internet or is everybody gown?

            = Larry

 

-----Original=20 Message-----
From:=20 owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com=20 [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On=20 Behalf Of Tom Worley
Sent: Wednesday, February 05, = 2003 8:22=20 PM
To:=20 canslim@lists.xmission.com
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Taking=20 Offense

 

maybe=20 it is easier for me because of nearly 7 years on the board and = seeing how=20 much Jeff stays in the background, but Ed's point is on target, be = careful=20 about overreacting before you have all the facts. Good lesson for = life, even=20 better one for investing.

 

Jeff=20 already invests a lot of his time and effort, and probably money, in = providing=20 this forum. I am willing to bet the very last thing he is interested = in doing=20 is having to monitor or censor every post.

 

-----=20 Original Message -----

 

From: NANCY = POLCARO=20

To: canslim =

Sent: Thursday, = February=20 06, 2003 12:50 AM

Subject: Re: = [CANSLIM]=20 Taking Offense

 

I=20 don't want to get in hot water here but Jeff did ask everyone what = they=20 thought about the whole situation -and Jans just told him. I'm sure if = he knew=20 it was a technical problem and not the way the new list was going to = function,=20 his response would have been different. Just a thought = Nancy

 

----- = Original=20 Message -----

From: Tom=20 Worley

Sent: = Wednesday, February=20 05, 2003 9:42 PM

To:=20 canslim@lists.xmission.com

Subject: Re: = [CANSLIM]=20 Taking Offense

 

I agree = with=20 Jeff's reply, I guessed the notice I got (same as jans) was
related = to the=20 new software, and just emailed Jeff directly about it. I = had
already seen=20 my post show up in the usual quick fashion, so knew it was = not
being=20 held.

Besides, as Ed says, it's Jeff's list, and his choice and = decision on
switching. It's not up to a majority vote, those that = don't=20 like it don't
have to continue. And his ability to monitor, control = even=20 when necessary,
has not only helped snuff out the few flames we = have had=20 over the years, but
also makes it possible for this to remain an=20 unmoderated board.

----- Original Message -----
From: = "Edward W.=20 Gjertsen II" <ed@macktracks.com>
To:=20 <canslim@lists.xmission.com>
Sent: Wednesday, February 05, = 2003 6:15=20 PM
Subject: [CANSLIM] Taking Offense


I think first and = foremost=20 we all need to remember that this is Jeff's
world: his list, not=20 ours.  We have the privilege to add our thoughts
and comments = here=20 because Jeff allows it.  If Jeff wanted to "screen"
responses, = it=20 would be his prerogative.

This  is a classic case of an = individual=20 overreacting prior to getting
all the facts:  A bad habit good = traders/investors should stay away
from.  I applaud Jeff in = his=20 efforts and again, if it wasn't for him, we
all would be just = reading IBD=20 at face value.  (Ooh - that sent shivers
down my spine).  = So,=20 thank you Jeff!

Ed Gjertsen=20 II
ed@macktracks.com


Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail = message, including any attachments,
is for the sole use of the = intended=20 recipient(s) and may contain
confidential and privileged = information. =20 Any unauthorized review, use,
disclosure or distribution is=20 prohibited.  If you are not the intended
recipient, please = contact the=20 sender by reply e-mail and destroy all
copies of the original=20 message.


-----Original Message-----
From:=20 = owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com
[mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.= com]=20 On Behalf Of Jeff Salisbury
Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 4:36 = PM
To: Spencer48@aol.com
Cc: = canslim@lists.xmission.com
Subject:=20 [CANSLIM] More on the new list-server=20 software



Spencer48@aol.com wrote:

>Jeff (if = this is=20 you):
>
>     Why is my post being = upheld for=20 so long?  It is now nearly 5 PM,=20 a
day
>later.
>
>     Also, I = didn't=20 know that the CANSLIM forum is a "restricted=20 list".
>
>     And  my letter = "...being=20 held until the list moderator can review
it for
>approval" = sounds=20 like something a CENSOR would love.  Every time I
write = in
>the=20 future to the CANSLIM forum, am I now going to have to go through=20 a

>gatekeeper?
>
>     If = this is an=20 example of the new address you were talking about, = I
don't
>like=20 it.  As a matter of fact, if I had known this could be=20 the
possible
>fallout, I wouldn't have agreed so readily to = the new=20 ISP.
>
>     I liked the free = interchange of=20 ideas in the CANSLIM forum, but
I'm not
>sure that I'll like = this new=20 wrinkle (as a matter of fact, I'm pretty
certain
>that I=20 won't):  It's like asking my parents for the keys to the=20 car-and

>waiting a day or so later for their=20 reply.
>
>jans
>
Hi Jans,

Hold your horses = there=20 partner!   ;-)     It isn't what you=20 think...
;-)

What I've done is subscribe the new = list-server's email=20 address to the
old canslim's distribution list.  I did this so = that=20 current messages
will distribute through the new list-serve. =20 Currently, I'm the only one

that is subscribed to the new = list-server,=20 everybody else is still
subscribed to the old list-server and the = server is=20 still working as it
always has.  You and all other subscribers = do not=20 need to do anything
differently at this point.

The message = you=20 received that your posting is awaiting approval is the
new = list-serve=20 telling you that your posting is being held for approval
(the old=20 list-server had already sent out your message).  Other = people
who have=20 posted in the last 24-48 hours have seen the same thing. =20 I've
subsequently turned the notification message off to help = allivate=20 the
confusion.

Two things to keep in mind regarding your=20 posting:

1) It was delivered immediatly to everybody via the = old=20 list-server and
was not held up in any way to the group.

2) = The old=20 list-server delivered a copy of your message to the = new
list-server. =20 I'm currently the only one subscribed to the new
list-server.  = However, the new list-server didn't recognize you has a
current = member=20 (because you aren't subscribed to the new list-server
yet) and held = up your=20 message to be approved.  It then sent you a
message saying = your=20 posting was being held for approval.

I don't know if this = helped=20 explain things or if it confused you more.
Regardless, just keep = these=20 things in mind:

1) The same old canslim list-server is still in = place=20 and will be until
I indicate otherwise.

2) I won't make the=20 transition unless or until:

  a) I'm confident that the = new=20 list-server will give us equal or better

service.

  = b) The=20 transition can be done in a smooth manner.

3) I will continue=20 experiementing in ways that will not disrupt the
operations of the = old=20 list-server, but in ways that may raise questions
or cause = confusion from=20 time to time.  You're not the only person to be
confused by my = experimentation.

4) I may conclude in the end to not make the=20 switch.  However, at this
point I am leaning to making the=20 switch.

5) Once I'm satisfied the move will be good, I'll throw = the=20 switch and
we'll all move over to the new list-server = en-mass.  =20 I won't do this
without letting everyone know a date and a time = well ahead=20 of time.

Regards,

Jeff - canslim=20 admin/owner







-
-To = subscribe/unsubscribe,=20 email "majordomo@xmission.com"
-In the email body, write "subscribe = canslim" or
-"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your = email.


-
-To subscribe/unsubscribe, email=20 "majordomo@xmission.com"
-In the email body, write "subscribe = canslim"=20 or
-"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your=20 email.



-
-To subscribe/unsubscribe, email=20 "majordomo@xmission.com"
-In the email body, write "subscribe = canslim"=20 or
-"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your=20 email.

- ------=_NextPart_001_001A_01C2CEAB.0A70A880-- - ------=_NextPart_000_0019_01C2CEAB.0A70A880 Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name="image001.gif" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-ID: <718205817@07022003-222f> R0lGODdhQAAuAHcAACH+GlNvZnR3YXJlOiBNaWNyb3NvZnQgT2ZmaWNlACwAAAAAQAAuAIcAAAAb GxsVFRUNDQ0eHh4HBwcZGRkPDw8dHR0CAgIMDAwWFhYSEhIUFBQREREEBAQFBQUaGhoLCwsICAgO Dg4GBgYYGBgQEBADAwMXFxcfHx8TExMJCQkBAQEKCgolJSU1NTU6OjokJCQnJycoKCgpKSkyMjIw MDAiIiI2NjYxMTEtLS0mJiYjIyM+Pj4hISEvLy8rKysqKio8PDw4ODg3Nzc9PT1eXl5VVVVTU1NX V1daWlpKSkpMTExfX19WVlZZWVlCQkJHR0dGRkZdXV1NTU1QUFBLS0tcXFxERERDQ0NPT09ISEhJ SUlBQUFbW1tAQEBOTk5sbGxzc3N3d3d1dXV4eHh/f399fX10dHRoaGhmZmZtbW1xcXFvb292dnZu bm5jY2N6enp5eXl+fn58fHxhYWFqampiYmJlZWVkZGSNjY2MjIyJiYmBgYGSkpKWlpaHh4eDg4OG hoaRkZGYmJiFhYWbm5uKioqOjo6Xl5eZmZmampqLi4uQkJCCgoKdnZ2AgICTk5OUlJSVlZW/v7+q qqqsrKygoKC0tLSioqKxsbG4uLi6urqvr6+2tra5ubmzs7Orq6ulpaWjo6OysrK+vr63t7e7u7u9 vb2urq61tbWmpqaoqKipqamwsLCtra2kpKTCwsLd3d3U1NTKysrc3NzY2NjFxcXe3t7b29va2trS 0tLJycnX19fR0dHT09PHx8fV1dXGxsbBwcHW1tbZ2dnAwMDLy8vQ0NDExMTPz8/+/v7v7+/s7Oz6 +vr39/fk5OTr6+v4+Pj09PTn5+f5+fnl5eX29vbj4+P19fXh4eHi4uLx8fHz8/Py8vLm5ubo6Ojw 8PDq6ur9/f3p6en7+/v8/Pzt7e3u7u7g4OD///8BAgMBAgMBAgMBAgMBAgMBAgMBAgMBAgMBAgMB AgMBAgMBAgMBAgMBAgMBAgMBAgMBAgMBAgMBAgMBAgMBAgMBAgMBAgMBAgMBAgMBAgMBAgMBAgMB AgMBAgMBAgMBAgMBAgMBAgMBAgMBAgMI/wB5CRxIsKDBgwgTKlzIsKHDhxAjSpxIsSKvbRgzGtRo 0WJGjL18FRL1a5vAjx87QkQJLJihGx8CAAAwKqOwQ1Jw5NCxpqTKhR+HkWKzA4SAmTMH8CC2rVcb AgAKhOAhAsANYCZ/EkQpzNCUEQUMID3Qw00pUxcRIUjgI1ExjMbeKDiW9edHZKfg7FjAoMEPRXEc kJBTM2MyIACCoEK5TVmJZXUrfmS26AaJAgNMzHl7SsgCKsFQjioBgA7Hk4xANIssMWOqOkMeADBQ pRHkbcMcEbGiiuO2U1XrYCy4zdmJN6xXbjP2qAgEACTsiHqGchUkZae3sYqAItLwrduMpP9Alrwh xmZ1VMw0cj3lQPcnW4k44Or7+211JJgqz3DbrzsrAHBAG6/AB1QwLABgiH0nbdPGAd5RtI0kUV0B DWMYbmTMDwBMwuBF28QxAR4fPrQNJQA4wEY0xUBTjDTQxAjNMdIYeFEeAGDx4TbIZKFAJSWaOM0R MxWggAQUEFBABRBAUEALOPzg4VasFDCEMZFhRIoLLTQS5ErUOKLFBwYYYMELPCCxBRc9XDATBrBk tQ0wMEAQS5bbGJJBCnTxF1FGvwADzDAfVaNHDAAkkEQycuoBQBZ1YTRNFw94YY2fEn5kjSxvKDGT CFVYco2cwIwgAl0gAkOJBSRc8qVkGA3/M8sXMgBwgQxgYIKVfds4usdHmcAwwRXTvNraeZpIQdoB M7RR2GkXPTMCCbvSsoQDSZRi7J8Y1WKFBrPloAijNp60CQB8bCNKERjQsNi2JmKECQ8YPBAGJ9jY iGEPAFgxRAUgSDIqpsptUwgTAFDgRi0pYciYJgkkikMllxL8py1LAPBAH2999xE2y9yihx5d6GAy EDxIAAAPuEBr1yUbAADEKdn9UooYSTDAAQQUkOAmUgB0EEGfWm2VClR3QLsNJDPMRMMYnXjyCRye JoyEHw7U4FPR7+EBwB8MYlRMzE2AkoskX9iAAQATABGKLNuoAgEQ13C9lR0AzILhMIDM7lSCekg5 wUacGcECQSAWS0hhCY/ogokjiVRhGQAeSCBbBk/0obdvtCSgo93vZWME0EEDIAIPe+TCyiu5MIPS VmwAcEXiElLDiCCDDEIILauQl+FB2yjSARm0Z+qwia88UEbxoDu0zS4PIN4819tkg4IZ8E7v/DZQ xECo9lptE3uE4Ku0TTIb2HDR9uUj1CsAP2BZHmPNtA+8NWEAEAUq1GB4jS/LuMMZ4KAN5hVtG9aY gtPQkAY8KIIKangCDFDAAxywYT/2c982MIEGBQCtSSAggiT6ZEDQZSQaq4jEIT7BjAuVK4PAc1gJ YdiRgAAAOw== - ------=_NextPart_000_0019_01C2CEAB.0A70A880-- - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ End of canslim-digest V2 #3161 ****************************** To unsubscribe to canslim-digest, send an email to "majordomo@xmission.com" with "unsubscribe canslim-digest" in the body of the message. For information on digests or retrieving files and old messages send "help" to the same address. Do not use quotes in your message.