From: owner-canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com (canslim-digest) To: canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com Subject: canslim-digest V2 #3438 Reply-To: canslim Sender: owner-canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com Errors-To: owner-canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com Precedence: bulk Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-No-Archive: yes canslim-digest Tuesday, July 22 2003 Volume 02 : Number 3438 In this issue: [CANSLIM] PRWK buyout RE: [CANSLIM] PRWK buyout RE: [CANSLIM] PRWK buyout Re: [CANSLIM] PRWK buyout [CANSLIM] Stops [CANSLIM] *** OFF TOPIC *** Anti CANSLIM ** Hit Delete ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2003 11:42:46 -0400 From: "Ben Chilcote" Subject: [CANSLIM] PRWK buyout This is a multi-part message in MIME format. - ------=_NextPart_000_007A_01C35046.5EDB9ED0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I have a question concerning how buyouts usually unfold. PRWK announced = yesterday that EK is buying them for $21.50 a share. Yesterday PRWK = traded between 21.18 and 21.24 with high volume of course. Today it has = traded between 21.20 and 21.24 so far. Is this tight trading range = normal and does it continue until the buyout is complete or will it = return to more "normal" trading activity? Thanks Ben - ------=_NextPart_000_007A_01C35046.5EDB9ED0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I have a question concerning how = buyouts usually=20 unfold. PRWK announced yesterday that EK is buying them for $21.50 = a=20 share. Yesterday PRWK traded between 21.18 and 21.24 with high = volume of=20 course. Today it has traded between 21.20 and 21.24 so far. = Is this=20 tight trading range normal and does it continue until the buyout is = complete or=20 will it return to more "normal" trading activity?

Thanks

Ben

- ------=_NextPart_000_007A_01C35046.5EDB9ED0-- - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2003 11:15:14 -0500 From: "Katherine Malm" Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] PRWK buyout This is a multi-part message in MIME format. - ------=_NextPart_000_0006_01C35042.86468CE0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Ben, The action of a stock to be acquired will be controlled primarily by the terms of the deal. For example, take a look at the chart of VNX. This is a cash deal for $35/share announced in June. You can see that the stock gaps up very near the cash deal price and then hovers there indefinitely until the deal is closed. In another deal such as HAND, also announced in June, you'll notice a different price pattern. That is primarily because the deal is a stock swap in which owners will receive .09 shares of PALM for each share of HAND. The price action will therefore be controlled by arbitrageurs. The price action in HAND will essentially mirror the action in PALM and closely match the .09 to 1 share ratio set by the terms of the deal and will stay that way until the deal is closed. Katherine -----Original Message----- From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of Ben Chilcote Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 9:43 AM To: canslim@lists.xmission.com Subject: [CANSLIM] PRWK buyout I have a question concerning how buyouts usually unfold. PRWK announced yesterday that EK is buying them for $21.50 a share. Yesterday PRWK traded between 21.18 and 21.24 with high volume of course. Today it has traded between 21.20 and 21.24 so far. Is this tight trading range normal and does it continue until the buyout is complete or will it return to more "normal" trading activity? Thanks Ben - ------=_NextPart_000_0006_01C35042.86468CE0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi Ben,

The action of a stock to be = acquired will be=20 controlled primarily by the terms of the deal. For example, take a look = at the=20 chart of VNX. This is a cash deal for $35/share announced in June. You = can see=20 that the stock gaps up very near the cash deal price and then hovers = there=20 indefinitely until the deal is closed. In another deal such as HAND, = also=20 announced in June, you'll notice a different price pattern. That is = primarily=20 because the deal is a stock swap in which owners will receive .09 shares = of PALM=20 for each share of HAND. The price action will therefore be controlled by = arbitrageurs. The price action in HAND will essentially mirror the = action in=20 PALM and closely match the .09 to 1 share ratio set by = the terms of=20 the deal and will stay that way until the deal is = closed.

Katherine

-----Original Message-----
From:=20 owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com=20 [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of Ben=20 Chilcote
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 9:43 AM
To:=20 canslim@lists.xmission.com
Subject: [CANSLIM] PRWK=20 buyout

I have a question concerning how = buyouts usually=20 unfold. PRWK announced yesterday that EK is buying them for = $21.50 a=20 share. Yesterday PRWK traded between 21.18 and 21.24 with high = volume of=20 course. Today it has traded between 21.20 and 21.24 so = far. Is=20 this tight trading range normal and does it continue until the buyout = is=20 complete or will it return to more "normal" trading=20 activity?

Thanks

Ben

- ------=_NextPart_000_0006_01C35042.86468CE0-- - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2003 09:38:21 -0700 From: Eddie Garratt Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] PRWK buyout This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. - ------_=_NextPart_001_01C3506F.A963FC80 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" I used to work for PRWK (it was INCX back then and then split into 2 companies PRWK and VWKS). I own almost 1500 shares. I had at one type almost completely written this off as lost money. Sweet. - -----Original Message----- From: Katherine Malm [mailto:kmalm@earthlink.net] Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 9:15 AM To: canslim@lists.xmission.com Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] PRWK buyout Hi Ben, The action of a stock to be acquired will be controlled primarily by the terms of the deal. For example, take a look at the chart of VNX. This is a cash deal for $35/share announced in June. You can see that the stock gaps up very near the cash deal price and then hovers there indefinitely until the deal is closed. In another deal such as HAND, also announced in June, you'll notice a different price pattern. That is primarily because the deal is a stock swap in which owners will receive .09 shares of PALM for each share of HAND. The price action will therefore be controlled by arbitrageurs. The price action in HAND will essentially mirror the action in PALM and closely match the .09 to 1 share ratio set by the terms of the deal and will stay that way until the deal is closed. Katherine - -----Original Message----- From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of Ben Chilcote Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 9:43 AM To: canslim@lists.xmission.com Subject: [CANSLIM] PRWK buyout I have a question concerning how buyouts usually unfold. PRWK announced yesterday that EK is buying them for $21.50 a share. Yesterday PRWK traded between 21.18 and 21.24 with high volume of course. Today it has traded between 21.20 and 21.24 so far. Is this tight trading range normal and does it continue until the buyout is complete or will it return to more "normal" trading activity? Thanks Ben - ------_=_NextPart_001_01C3506F.A963FC80 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1"

I used to work for PRWK (it was INCX back then and then split into 2 companies PRWK and VWKS). I own almost 1500 shares. I had at one type almost completely written this off as lost money. Sweet.

-----Original Message-----
From: Katherine Malm [mailto:kmalm@earthlink.net]
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 9:15 AM
To: canslim@lists.xmission.com
Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] PRWK buyout

Hi Ben,

The action of a stock to be acquired will be controlled primarily by the terms of the deal. For example, take a look at the chart of VNX. This is a cash deal for $35/share announced in June. You can see that the stock gaps up very near the cash deal price and then hovers there indefinitely until the deal is closed. In another deal such as HAND, also announced in June, you'll notice a different price pattern. That is primarily because the deal is a stock swap in which owners will receive .09 shares of PALM for each share of HAND. The price action will therefore be controlled by arbitrageurs. The price action in HAND will essentially mirror the action in PALM and closely match the .09 to 1 share ratio set by the terms of the deal and will stay that way until the deal is closed.

Katherine

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of Ben Chilcote
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 9:43 AM
To: canslim@lists.xmission.com
Subject: [CANSLIM] PRWK buyout

I have a question concerning how buyouts usually unfold. PRWK announced yesterday that EK is buying them for $21.50 a share. Yesterday PRWK traded between 21.18 and 21.24 with high volume of course. Today it has traded between 21.20 and 21.24 so far. Is this tight trading range normal and does it continue until the buyout is complete or will it return to more "normal" trading activity?

Thanks

Ben

- ------_=_NextPart_001_01C3506F.A963FC80-- - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2003 12:41:12 -0400 From: "Ben Chilcote" Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] PRWK buyout This is a multi-part message in MIME format. - ------=_NextPart_000_00A6_01C3504E.88669040 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Katherine, Thanks for your quick response. Guess I will sell my shares then, since = there doesn't seem to be a chance for moving any higher any time soon. Thanks, Ben ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Katherine Malm=20 To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20 Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 12:15 PM Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] PRWK buyout Hi Ben, The action of a stock to be acquired will be controlled primarily by = the terms of the deal. For example, take a look at the chart of VNX. = This is a cash deal for $35/share announced in June. You can see that = the stock gaps up very near the cash deal price and then hovers there = indefinitely until the deal is closed. In another deal such as HAND, = also announced in June, you'll notice a different price pattern. That is = primarily because the deal is a stock swap in which owners will receive = .09 shares of PALM for each share of HAND. The price action will = therefore be controlled by arbitrageurs. The price action in HAND will = essentially mirror the action in PALM and closely match the .09 to 1 = share ratio set by the terms of the deal and will stay that way until = the deal is closed. Katherine -----Original Message----- From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com = [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of Ben Chilcote Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 9:43 AM To: canslim@lists.xmission.com Subject: [CANSLIM] PRWK buyout I have a question concerning how buyouts usually unfold. PRWK = announced yesterday that EK is buying them for $21.50 a share. = Yesterday PRWK traded between 21.18 and 21.24 with high volume of = course. Today it has traded between 21.20 and 21.24 so far. Is this = tight trading range normal and does it continue until the buyout is = complete or will it return to more "normal" trading activity? Thanks Ben - ------=_NextPart_000_00A6_01C3504E.88669040 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi Katherine,

Thanks for your quick response. = Guess I will=20 sell my shares then, since there doesn't seem to be a chance for moving = any=20 higher any time soon.

Thanks,

Ben

----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Katherine=20 Malm
To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=

Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 = 12:15=20 PM

Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] PRWK = buyout

Hi Ben,

The action of a stock to be = acquired will=20 be controlled primarily by the terms of the deal. For example, take a = look at=20 the chart of VNX. This is a cash deal for $35/share announced in June. = You can=20 see that the stock gaps up very near the cash deal price and then = hovers there=20 indefinitely until the deal is closed. In another deal such as HAND, = also=20 announced in June, you'll notice a different price pattern. That is = primarily=20 because the deal is a stock swap in which owners will receive .09 = shares of=20 PALM for each share of HAND. The price action will therefore be = controlled by=20 arbitrageurs. The price action in HAND will essentially mirror the = action in=20 PALM and closely match the .09 to 1 share ratio set by = the terms of=20 the deal and will stay that way until the deal is = closed.

Katherine

-----Original Message-----
From:=20 owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com=20 [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of Ben=20 Chilcote
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 9:43 = AM
To:=20 canslim@lists.xmission.com
Subject: [CANSLIM] PRWK=20 buyout

I have a question concerning how = buyouts=20 usually unfold. PRWK announced yesterday that EK is buying = them for=20 $21.50 a share. Yesterday PRWK traded between 21.18 and 21.24 = with=20 high volume of course. Today it has traded between 21.20 and = 21.24 so=20 far. Is this tight trading range normal and does it continue = until the=20 buyout is complete or will it return to more "normal" trading=20 activity?

Thanks

Ben

- ------=_NextPart_000_00A6_01C3504E.88669040-- - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2003 13:03:40 -0500 From: "Gene Ricci" Subject: [CANSLIM] Stops This is a multi-part message in MIME format. - ------=_NextPart_000_01BA_01C35051.ABF35590 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable "A stop automatically takes your brain out of reverse and puts it into = neutral. Your money's not back to neutral, but your mind's back to the = point where you can regroup and try to think up a fresh idea without the = pressure of a losing position hanging over your head." =20 - -Pit Bull, by Martin Schwartz,p.123 - ------=_NextPart_000_01BA_01C35051.ABF35590 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

"A stop automatically takes your brain out of = reverse and=20 puts it into neutral. Your money's not back to neutral, but your mind's = back to=20 the point where you can regroup and try to think up a fresh idea without = the=20 pressure of a losing position hanging over your head."

-Pit = Bull, by=20 Martin Schwartz,p.123=20

- ------=_NextPart_000_01BA_01C35051.ABF35590-- - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2003 18:11:38 -0500 From: "Gene Ricci" Subject: [CANSLIM] *** OFF TOPIC *** Anti CANSLIM ** Hit Delete This is a multi-part message in MIME format. - ------=_NextPart_000_04C6_01C3507C.B1F0F030 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable A couple of days ago someone asked about VectorVest and CANSLIM. Here's = a person that thinks using VV is better than looking for CS candidates. = I removed his name. The following was posted on one of the VectorVest = Yahoo Groups this morning (by long time VV user).=20 Gene Anti CANSLIM =20 Much has been written about William O'Neil's stock selection and market = timing. Glowing reports of great results and performances overshadow = the errors in the system that prevent people from being successful = investors. Here's my opinion of the Hollywood Huckster's system. =20 1) William O'Neil has only one system of strategy - buying stocks = on breakouts. Some people claim that this is the holy grail, but others = have found that they're buying at the top of the stock, not the bottom = of a great beginning. My personal experience has been that after I buy = at a pivot point, the stock then plunges at least 20% so I have to dump = the stock and wait until my account is sufficient to buy with. I have = destroyed my account totally at least three times since beginning with = the system. I used CANSLIM from 1988 to 1998, and had only one good = year, 1991, when I matched the S&P. All other years I lost money. On = the contrary, VectorVest has an unlimited number of strategies that can = be implemented. =20 2) William O'Neil has no idea as to when to sell a stock. In the = book, How to Make Money in Stocks, he outlines 30 potential sell points. = What I gather is that HE DOESN'T KNOW!! =20 =20 3) William O'Neil suggest that one should buy stocks only priced = above 12 or 15 dollars a share. Sorry, fella, but penny stock = strategies are sound, as Zach's Zoomers has been a great success. =20 4) William O'Neil says you need to buy low cap stocks. What this = means is that you buy stocks with 1 million float or so. This is more = dangerous than ever, as the slightest activity of selling can sent the = stock crashing. =20 5) In Investor's Business Daily, you can find nothing that matches = VectorVest's Relative Safety feature. Basically, IBD's highly touted = stocks are a piece of trash that made it to the top rankings by earnings = increase alone. =20 6) The Relative Strength and Earnings Per Share rankings are of no = use when trying to find quality stocks. VectorVest's Relative Timing is = far superior as it gives an accurate picture of what the stock is doing = in recent performance. IBD's ranking implies there are a certain number = of stocks at 99, the same at 98 etc. Since the ranking is relative, you = can't tell if the market is going under accumulation or distribution. =20 7) Chart formation analysis is the bastion of IBD's system. = However, you take a look at some of the formations and you will swear = there is no rhyme or reason to buying the kind of stocks he suggests. = Chart formations are not automatic and do not guarantee results. The = cup and handle formation is not a trip to financial freedom as WON = suggests. 8) William O'Neil has no safe strategy with his system. Basically, = if you want to buy quality large cap stocks, you're out of luck. WON = ran a mutual fund in the 1960's, and he was first one year then last the = next. WON likes volatile stocks that move up and down fast for a wild = ride. Sustainable results? Not likely. Also whiz kid David Ryan ran a = mutual fund in the 1999's called the New USA Growth Fund. His = performance was mediocre and the fund was sold after 5 years. David = probably gave up as he wasn't getting spectacular results as well as he = got in his contest results in the 1980's. =20 9) The volume of chart formation reading makes CANSLIM a burden of = beast instead of a easy reference that VV gives. With VV, at the touch = of a button, I get 10 potential purchases. With CANSLIM I have to wade = through tons of material to reach my 7 stocks. It's so much work you = can't give any time to your life. =20 10) William O'Neil suggest to buy one or two stocks if you have $5K to = $10K and progress up to a 5 stock portfolio. Most beginning investors = have a limited amount of money and the burden of picking big winners is = very difficult. If they strike out on one or two stocks, how are they = to regain confidence? On the contrary, VectorVest suggests buying 10 = stocks at a time to diversify. CANSLIM does not diversify, in fact id = concentrates into a few stocks. I would not stray from legendary stock = guru John Templeton's way of diversification. =20 11) Try to find a short strategy like VectorVest has and you'll have a = hard time finding one in IBD. Because William O'Neil has been snuffed = out in more bear markets than he can remember. He tried to do it with = chart formations and it's not the way to go with shorts. VectorVest is = right on target with short strategies, and it's at the touch of a = button. =20 12) CANSLIM - CAN'T SWIM XXXXX - ------=_NextPart_000_04C6_01C3507C.B1F0F030 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

A couple of days ago someone asked = about=20 VectorVest and CANSLIM. Here's a person that thinks using VV is better = than=20 looking for CS candidates. I removed his name. The following was = posted on=20 one of the VectorVest Yahoo Groups this morning (by long time VV=20 user).=20

Gene

Anti=20 CANSLIM

Much=20 has been written about William O=92Neil=92s stock selection and market = timing. Glowing reports of great = results and=20 performances overshadow the errors in the system that prevent people = from being=20 successful investors. = Here=92s my=20 opinion of the Hollywood Huckster=92s system.

1) =20 William O=92Neil has only one system of strategy =96 buying = stocks on=20 breakouts. Some people = claim that=20 this is the holy grail, but others have found that they=92re buying at = the top of=20 the stock, not the bottom of a great beginning. My personal experience has = been that=20 after I buy at a pivot point, the stock then plunges at least 20% so I = have to=20 dump the stock and wait until my account is sufficient to buy with. I have destroyed my account = totally at=20 least three times since beginning with the system. I used CANSLIM from 1988 to = 1998, and=20 had only one good year, 1991, when I matched the S&P. All other years I lost = money. On the contrary, VectorVest = has an=20 unlimited number of strategies that can be implemented.

2) =20 William O=92Neil has no idea as to when to sell a stock. In the book, How to Make Money = in=20 Stocks, he outlines 30 potential sell points. What I gather is that HE = DOESN=92T=20 KNOW!!

3) =20 William O=92Neil suggest that one should buy stocks only priced = above 12 or=20 15 dollars a share. = Sorry, fella,=20 but penny stock strategies are sound, as Zach=92s Zoomers has been a = great=20 success.

4) =20 William O=92Neil says you need to buy low cap stocks. What this means is that you = buy stocks=20 with 1 million float or so. = This is=20 more dangerous than ever, as the slightest activity of selling can sent = the=20 stock crashing.

5) = In=20 Investor=92s Business Daily, you can find nothing that matches = VectorVest=92s=20 Relative Safety feature. = Basically,=20 IBD=92s highly touted stocks are a piece of trash that made it to the = top rankings=20 by earnings increase alone.

6) = The=20 Relative Strength and Earnings Per Share rankings are of no use when = trying to=20 find quality stocks. = VectorVest=92s=20 Relative Timing is far superior as it gives an accurate picture of what = the=20 stock is doing in recent performance. =20 IBD=92s ranking implies there are a certain number of stocks at = 99, the=20 same at 98 etc. Since the = ranking=20 is relative, you can=92t tell if the market is going under accumulation = or=20 distribution.

7) = Chart=20 formation analysis is the bastion of IBD=92s system. However, you take a look at = some of the=20 formations and you will swear there is no rhyme or reason to buying the = kind of=20 stocks he suggests. Chart = formations are not automatic and do not guarantee results. The cup and handle formation = is not a=20 trip to financial freedom as WON suggests.

8) =20 William O=92Neil has no safe strategy with his system. Basically, if you want to buy = quality=20 large cap stocks, you=92re out of luck. =20 WON ran a mutual fund in the 1960=92s, and he was first one year = then last=20 the next. WON likes = volatile stocks=20 that move up and down fast for a wild ride. Sustainable results? Not likely. Also whiz kid David Ryan ran a = mutual=20 fund in the 1999=92s called the New USA Growth Fund. His performance was mediocre = and the=20 fund was sold after 5 years. = David=20 probably gave up as he wasn=92t getting spectacular results as well as = he got in=20 his contest results in the 1980=92s.

9) = The=20 volume of chart formation reading makes CANSLIM a burden of beast = instead of a=20 easy reference that VV gives. = With=20 VV, at the touch of a button, I get 10 potential purchases. With CANSLIM I have to wade = through tons=20 of material to reach my 7 stocks. =20 It=92s so much work you can=92t give any time to your = life.

10) =20 William O=92Neil = suggest to=20 buy one or two stocks if you have $5K to $10K and progress up to a 5 = stock=20 portfolio. Most beginning = investors=20 have a limited amount of money and the burden of picking big winners is = very=20 difficult. If they strike = out on=20 one or two stocks, how are they to regain confidence? On the contrary, VectorVest = suggests=20 buying 10 stocks at a time to diversify. =20 CANSLIM does not diversify, in fact id concentrates into a few=20 stocks. I would not stray = from=20 legendary stock guru John Templeton=92s way of = diversification.

11) =20 Try to find a = short strategy=20 like VectorVest has and you=92ll have a hard time finding one in = IBD. Because William O=92Neil has = been snuffed=20 out in more bear markets than he can remember. He tried to do it with chart = formations=20 and it=92s not the way to go with shorts. =20 VectorVest is right on target with short strategies, and it=92s = at the=20 touch of a button.

12) =20 CANSLIM =96 CAN=92T SWIM

XXXXX

- ------=_NextPart_000_04C6_01C3507C.B1F0F030-- - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ End of canslim-digest V2 #3438 ****************************** To unsubscribe to canslim-digest, send an email to "majordomo@xmission.com" with "unsubscribe canslim-digest" in the body of the message. For information on digests or retrieving files and old messages send "help" to the same address. Do not use quotes in your message.