From: owner-canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com (canslim-digest) To: canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com Subject: canslim-digest V2 #963 Reply-To: canslim Sender: owner-canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com Errors-To: owner-canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com Precedence: bulk Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-No-Archive: yes canslim-digest Thursday, July 27 2000 Volume 02 : Number 963 In this issue: Re: [CANSLIM] SHFL [none] RE: [CANSLIM] Investors.com [CANSLIM] SHFL [CANSLIM] Re: Re: [CANSLIM] Re: [CANSLIM] Valuable web site [CANSLIM] Bloodbath in Japan [CANSLIM] Whip, whip #2 Re: [CANSLIM] Whip, whip #2 [CANSLIM] Re: Re: [CANSLIM] Whip, whip #2 Re: [CANSLIM] Whip, whip #2 Re: [CANSLIM] Whip, whip #2 Re: [CANSLIM] Whip, whip #2 Re: [CANSLIM] Whip, whip #2 Re: [CANSLIM] Whip, whip #2 [CANSLIM] Re: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2000 14:07:50 -0400 From: "lynn williams" Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] SHFL INSP and go2net are merging.. just over the wires.... Lynn - ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tom Worley" To: Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2000 11:01 PM Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] SHFL > Ooops, five year earnings growth rate is at 22% > > Tom Worley > stkguru@netside.net > chat with me at ICQ # 5568838 > get ICQ software at http://www.icq.com/icqhomepage.html > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Tom Worley > To: > Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2000 10:49 PM > Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] SHFL > > > Tomorrow's IBD # (from tonight's DGO #) are RS 86; EPS 94; GRS > D; SMR A; A/D A; Timeliness C; ROE 14%; u/d ratio 1.0; funds 27% > of the float; management 9% of the issue. Last 4 qtrs earnings > are up 22% to 37%. Five year earnings growth is at %. > > Tom Worley > stkguru@netside.net > chat with me at ICQ # 5568838 > get ICQ software at http://www.icq.com/icqhomepage.html > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: > To: > Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2000 10:10 PM > Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] SHFL > > > > > Would anyone be able to post numbers of FISV? (Sorry, don't have > access to > the paper right now) > > Thank you > > Anna > > > > - > > > > - > > > > - > - - ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2000 16:48:48 -0600 From: jeff.salisbury@xmission.com Subject: [none] <20000726140630.DRLS14966.mail.rdc4.on.home.com@cr173116-a.etob1.on.wave.home.com> for ; Wed, 26 Jul 2000 07:06:30 -0700 Received: from localhost (cappy@localhost) by cr173116-a.etob1.on.wave.home.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA83838 for ; Wed, 26 Jul 2000 10:06:30 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from cappy@cr173116-a.etob1.on.wave.home.com) Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2000 10:06:29 -0400 (EDT) From: Dennis Jun Reply-To: Dennis Jun To: canslim@lists.xmission.com Subject: Investors.com In-Reply-To: <3.0.3.32.20000725225333.006b3a6c@pop.nycap.rr.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII The site has alot! and even more to come. Howver, as a IBD subscriber, I feel like I'm sorta getting jipped. They put most of the major articles on the site, and some important screening with the high EPS and RS companies. Although, they do miss alot of the companies that are rated low 90s in EPS and RS, so that's fine. However, if the screener becomes improved and customised later on, for instance, to screen out 90+ stocks in EPS and RS, there won't be much use for my IBD paper anymore. What do you guys think? - - ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2000 18:57:07 -0400 From: Dan Forant Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] Investors.com Actually if you subscribe to the print version, IBD's charts and screen of the day are free. Seemed a little buggy tonite, couldn't access chart. Are the charts customizable for 52 months?? At 06:46 AM 7/26/00 -0500, you wrote: > >I love the new site. This is great. I wonder what will be the cost after >the bets period. I am very impressed so far. > >PS I did get into SHFL at 15 yesterday. Fingers are crossed. > > > > >Dwayne P. Andras >DeeAndras@cajun.net > > >-----Original Message----- >From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com >[mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of Dan Forant >Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2000 9:54 PM >To: canslim@xmission.com >Subject: [CANSLIM] Investors.com > > >Wow did they pump this site up. It's about time. Shfl made the front page. >98 88 A A A >Hope it keeps kicking Wed. > >Dan > >- > > > >- > > - - ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2000 19:57:27 -0400 From: Pierre Lapointe Subject: [CANSLIM] SHFL IBD had a story about the gaming biz in Monday's edition. The gist is that casino's need to keep the action new and fresh to keep the gamblers coming back. One of the ways to do this is to replace traditional slot machines with video slot machines. The story mentioned SHFL and IGT among others in this vein. What the story missed is that SHFL and IGT are teaming up in a joint venture to merge their technology and will split the proceeds 50/50. I think SHFL is worth a gamble! - - ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2000 20:45:18 EDT From: Kraus0R@cs.com Subject: [CANSLIM] Re: I thought the Daily Graphs section was a little weak. Doesn't DGO also list institutions/funds also in a stock ? What does this offer that you can't get from Bigcharts or SEC filings ? The stock screener is nice. Addidional screens would be good. The old investors.com site also had all the articles listed and so forth. Overall, I like it, but I wouldn't pay extra for the "power tools". - - ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2000 20:58:03 -0400 From: Dan Forant Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Re: It's a little slow and pokey, at first it looked promising, but I'll stick w,clearstation.com., and Meta Stock, I do like the "Screen of the Day" which I get free with the print paper subs. Dan At 08:45 PM 7/26/00 EDT, you wrote: >I thought the Daily Graphs section was a little weak. Doesn't DGO also list >institutions/funds also in a stock ? What does this offer that you can't get >from Bigcharts or SEC filings ? The stock screener is nice. Addidional >screens would be good. The old investors.com site also had all the articles >listed and so forth. Overall, I like it, but I wouldn't pay extra for the >"power tools". > >- > > - - ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2000 20:23:31 -0700 (PDT) From: d mac Subject: [CANSLIM] Valuable web site Don't know if anyone has posted this site but it evaluates stocks based on WON's criteria. Check it out. I was looking at ADCT when I found this. http://www.validea.com/StockReport.asp?Section=guru&Ticker=adct&gurupage=ONeil P.S. Shfl (I don't own any) was well rated. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get Yahoo! Mail - Free email you can access from anywhere! http://mail.yahoo.com/ - - ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2000 23:43:40 -0400 From: "Tom Worley" Subject: [CANSLIM] Bloodbath in Japan Seems the weak technology market, and fears of more bankruptcies, has finally hit reality in Japan. Down 2.57% currently. Hasn't broken 16,000 just yet, but close. Will be interesting to see if it carries over to the rest of Asia, and Europe tomorrow. Some of the tech stocks hit hard, but the securities industry hit hardest as a group as investors expect a slowdown in trading activity. Tom Worley stkguru@netside.net chat with me at ICQ # 5568838 get ICQ software at http://www.icq.com/icqhomepage.html - - ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2000 21:50:49 -0600 From: Earl Setser Subject: [CANSLIM] Whip, whip #2 Well, another down day today as the NAS continues to reverse almost daily. I noticed that today's move WAS on stronger volume, so today would be Distribution Day 1. I think this market has shown a lot of weakness over the last couple of weeks, and I'm really losing my confidence that we are going up from here. Based on this, I suggest we all watch carefully for the warning signs. We are seeing numerous breakouts fail, and I think that is a very bad sign. If we see 2 or 3 more D-Days in the next week or two, it will be time to close up those stops and batten down the hatches!! - - ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2000 13:34:44 +0700 From: "Peter Christiansen" Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Whip, whip #2 Yesterday I was stopped out of my last two positions, and am 100% cash. - ----- Original Message ----- From: "Earl Setser" To: Cc: Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2000 10:50 AM Subject: [CANSLIM] Whip, whip #2 > Well, another down day today as the NAS continues to reverse almost daily. > I noticed that today's move WAS on stronger volume, so today would be > Distribution Day 1. I think this market has shown a lot of weakness over > the last couple of weeks, and I'm really losing my confidence that we are > going up from here. Based on this, I suggest we all watch carefully for > the warning signs. We are seeing numerous breakouts fail, and I think that > is a very bad sign. If we see 2 or 3 more D-Days in the next week or two, > it will be time to close up those stops and batten down the hatches!! > > - > - - ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2000 19:34:23 -0400 From: Dan Forant Subject: [CANSLIM] Re: I'm just waiting for the day it improves enough and I'll cancel the print form and go entirely online. Dan. At 04:48 PM 7/26/00 -0600, you wrote: ><20000726140630.DRLS14966.mail.rdc4.on.home.com@cr173116-a.etob1.on.wave.ho me.com> > for ; Wed, 26 Jul 2000 07:06:30 -0700 >Received: from localhost (cappy@localhost) > by cr173116-a.etob1.on.wave.home.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id >KAA83838 > for ; Wed, 26 Jul 2000 10:06:30 -0400 >(EDT) > (envelope-from cappy@cr173116-a.etob1.on.wave.home.com) >Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2000 10:06:29 -0400 (EDT) >From: Dennis Jun >Reply-To: Dennis Jun >To: canslim@lists.xmission.com >Subject: Investors.com >In-Reply-To: <3.0.3.32.20000725225333.006b3a6c@pop.nycap.rr.com> >Message-ID: > >MIME-Version: 1.0 >Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII > >The site has alot! and even more to come. Howver, as a IBD subscriber, I >feel like I'm sorta getting jipped. They put most of the major articles on >the site, and some important screening with the high EPS and RS >companies. Although, they do miss alot of the companies that are rated low >90s in EPS and RS, so that's fine. However, if the screener becomes >improved and customised later on, for instance, to screen out 90+ stocks >in EPS and RS, there won't be much use for my IBD paper anymore. What do >you guys think? > >- > > - - ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2000 07:39:09 -0700 From: Tim Fisher Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Whip, whip #2 Guess it doesn't look that dire to me. Technically, the NAZ has failed the latest rally attempt but has gobs of support from 3877 all the way to 3767, which has held since the beginning of June. Interestingly enough, it has been as low as 3873 today, and looks to be holding around the upper end of that support. The past few days, the leaders (i.e. recent CANSLIM breakouts) have held up far better than the index. I dunno about your accounts, but mine has outperformed the NAZ every day for a week. Sure, I'm getting stopped out of those failed breakouts, but many either merely dropped back into the base or retreated to the pivot and are holding in that range. Too many stocks on my watch list to list here are still within a few percent of their highs. But hey, bring on that bear sentiment! Let's have a big "V" so we can return to sensibility! On 08:50 PM 7/26/00, Earl Setser Said: >Well, another down day today as the NAS continues to reverse almost daily. >I noticed that today's move WAS on stronger volume, so today would be >Distribution Day 1. I think this market has shown a lot of weakness over >the last couple of weeks, and I'm really losing my confidence that we are >going up from here. Based on this, I suggest we all watch carefully for >the warning signs. We are seeing numerous breakouts fail, and I think that >is a very bad sign. If we see 2 or 3 more D-Days in the next week or two, >it will be time to close up those stops and batten down the hatches!! > >- Tim Fisher Ore-Rock-On and Pacific Fishery Biologists WWW Sites Tim@OreRockOn.com WWW: http://OreRockOn.com See naked fish and rocks! - - ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2000 13:50:24 -0400 From: Walter Stock Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Whip, whip #2 Hope we can still find some bear sentiment, Tim... according to today's IBD, it has slumped to 30.8%. Meanwhile bull sentiment has moved up sharply to 54.2%, close to the 55% red zone. The semiconductor group has been ugly for two weeks, breaking below several key support levels. I sold my last semiconductor stock ELNT into the morning strength on Monday at 81 3/4. We had one major distribution day yesterday, and the action in the leaders seems to be to look for an excuse to sell.. If I see more of the big distribution, I will be selling into rallies, and moving to 100% cash in a hurry. Presently about 50% invested. Walter Stock Oakville, ON, Canada Tim Fisher wrote: > Guess it doesn't look that dire to me. Technically, the NAZ has failed the > latest rally attempt but has gobs of support from 3877 all the way to 3767, > which has held since the beginning of June. Interestingly enough, it has > been as low as 3873 today, and looks to be holding around the upper end of > that support. The past few days, the leaders (i.e. recent CANSLIM > breakouts) have held up far better than the index. I dunno about your > accounts, but mine has outperformed the NAZ every day for a week. Sure, I'm > getting stopped out of those failed breakouts, but many either merely > dropped back into the base or retreated to the pivot and are holding in > that range. Too many stocks on my watch list to list here are still within > a few percent of their highs. > > But hey, bring on that bear sentiment! Let's have a big "V" so we can > return to sensibility! > - - ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2000 13:47:28 -0400 From: kraus0r@cs.com Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Whip, whip #2 The Nasdaq still has that gap at 3600 it may try to fill. Notice how KEI stopped falling at the gap ? Roger canslim@lists.xmission.com wrote: > > Hope we can still find some bear sentiment, Tim...  according to today's IBD, > it has slumped to 30.8%.   Meanwhile bull sentiment has moved up sharply > to 54.2%, close to the 55% red zone. > > The semiconductor group has been ugly for two weeks, breaking below > several key support levels.   I sold my last semiconductor stock ELNT into the > morning strength on Monday at 81 3/4. > > We had one major distribution day yesterday, and the action in the leaders seems > > to be to look for an excuse to sell..   If I see more of the big distribution, > I will be > selling into rallies, and moving to 100% cash in a hurry. > > Presently about 50% invested. > > Walter Stock > Oakville, ON, Canada > > Tim Fisher wrote: > > > Guess it doesn't look that dire to me. Technically, the NAZ has failed the > > latest rally attempt but has gobs of support from 3877 all the way to 3767, > > which has held since the beginning of June. Interestingly enough, it has > > been as low as 3873 today, and looks to be holding around the upper end of > > that support. The past few days, the leaders (i.e. recent CANSLIM > > breakouts) have held up far better than the index. I dunno about your > > accounts, but mine has outperformed the NAZ every day for a week. Sure, I'm > > getting stopped out of those failed breakouts, but many either merely > > dropped back into the base or retreated to the pivot and are holding in > > that range. Too many stocks on my watch list to list here are still within > > a few percent of their highs. > > > > But hey, bring on that bear sentiment! Let's have a big "V" so we can > > return to sensibility! > > > > > - > > - - ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2000 11:22:05 -0700 From: Tim Fisher Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Whip, whip #2 I'd like a chartists' opinion of this, but since it had traded up through 3600 way back in the golden olden days, then back down through it in the recent baddie days, is it really a gap? It seems to me that a gap exists where the stock has not ever traded at that level, then gaps up through it, i.e. no there is no prior support or resistance in the gap area. Therefore I see no technical reason why the NAZ would try to fill this particular gap. On 10:47 AM 7/27/00, kraus0r@cs.com Said: >The Nasdaq still has that gap at 3600 it may try to fill. Notice how KEI >stopped falling at the gap ? > >Roger > > >canslim@lists.xmission.com wrote: > > > > Hope we can still find some bear sentiment, Tim... according to > today's IBD, > > it has slumped to 30.8%. Meanwhile bull sentiment has moved up sharply > > to 54.2%, close to the 55% red zone. > > > > The semiconductor group has been ugly for two weeks, breaking below > > several key support levels. I sold my last semiconductor stock ELNT > into the > > morning strength on Monday at 81 3/4. > > > > We had one major distribution day yesterday, and the action in the > leaders seems > > > > to be to look for an excuse to sell.. If I see more of the big > distribution, > > I will be > > selling into rallies, and moving to 100% cash in a hurry. > > > > Presently about 50% invested. > > > > Walter Stock > > Oakville, ON, Canada > > > > Tim Fisher wrote: > > > > > Guess it doesn't look that dire to me. Technically, the NAZ has > failed the > > > latest rally attempt but has gobs of support from 3877 all the way to > 3767, > > > which has held since the beginning of June. Interestingly enough, it has > > > been as low as 3873 today, and looks to be holding around the upper > end of > > > that support. The past few days, the leaders (i.e. recent CANSLIM > > > breakouts) have held up far better than the index. I dunno about your > > > accounts, but mine has outperformed the NAZ every day for a week. > Sure, I'm > > > getting stopped out of those failed breakouts, but many either merely > > > dropped back into the base or retreated to the pivot and are holding in > > > that range. Too many stocks on my watch list to list here are still > within > > > a few percent of their highs. > > > > > > But hey, bring on that bear sentiment! Let's have a big "V" so we can > > > return to sensibility! > > > > > > > > > - > > > > > >- Tim Fisher Ore-Rock-On and Pacific Fishery Biologists WWW Sites Tim@OreRockOn.com WWW: http://OreRockOn.com See naked fish and rocks! - - ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2000 15:13:57 -0400 From: kraus0r@cs.com Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Whip, whip #2 Tim, I see your point. I decided to give the new IBD site a try by posing the following question to Mr O'Neill. "Do you concern yourself with price gaps in a stocks trading action ? And if so does it make any difference if the gap occurs coming out of a correction, or if it occurs while the stock is making new highs ? Thanks for your time." I'll keep you informed. Roger canslim@lists.xmission.com wrote: > > I'd like a chartists' opinion of this, but since it had traded up through > 3600 way back in the golden olden days, then back down through it in the > recent baddie days, is it really a gap? It seems to me that a gap exists > where the stock has not ever traded at that level, then gaps up through it, > i.e. no there is no prior support or resistance in the gap area. Therefore > I see no technical reason why the NAZ would try to fill this particular gap. > > On 10:47 AM 7/27/00, kraus0r@cs.com Said: > >The Nasdaq still has that gap at 3600 it may try to fill.  Notice how KEI > >stopped falling at the gap ? > > > >Roger > > > > > >canslim@lists.xmission.com wrote: > > > > > > Hope we can still find some bear sentiment, Tim...  according to > > today's IBD, > > > it has slumped to 30.8%.   Meanwhile bull sentiment has moved up sharply > > > to 54.2%, close to the 55% red zone. > > > > > > The semiconductor group has been ugly for two weeks, breaking below > > > several key support levels.   I sold my last semiconductor stock ELNT > > into the > > > morning strength on Monday at 81 3/4. > > > > > > We had one major distribution day yesterday, and the action in the > > leaders seems > > > > > > to be to look for an excuse to sell..   If I see more of the big > > distribution, > > > I will be > > > selling into rallies, and moving to 100% cash in a hurry. > > > > > > Presently about 50% invested. > > > > > > Walter Stock > > > Oakville, ON, Canada > > > > > > Tim Fisher wrote: > > > > > > > Guess it doesn't look that dire to me. Technically, the NAZ has > > failed the > > > > latest rally attempt but has gobs of support from 3877 all the way to > > 3767, > > > > which has held since the beginning of June. Interestingly enough, it has > > > > been as low as 3873 today, and looks to be holding around the upper > > end of > > > > that support. The past few days, the leaders (i.e. recent CANSLIM > > > > breakouts) have held up far better than the index. I dunno about your > > > > accounts, but mine has outperformed the NAZ every day for a week. > > Sure, I'm > > > > getting stopped out of those failed breakouts, but many either merely > > > > dropped back into the base or retreated to the pivot and are holding in > > > > that range. Too many stocks on my watch list to list here are still > > within > > > > a few percent of their highs. > > > > > > > > But hey, bring on that bear sentiment! Let's have a big "V" so we can > > > > return to sensibility! > > > > > > > > > > > > > - > > > > > > > > > >- > > Tim Fisher > Ore-Rock-On and Pacific Fishery Biologists WWW Sites > > Tim@OreRockOn.com > WWW: http://OreRockOn.com > See naked fish and rocks! > > > - > > - - ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2000 11:29:55 -0700 From: Bill Weliky Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Whip, whip #2 I, too, would love to find an answer to that question. I think as you do but couldn't find it in Elder's book. I always wonder if misinformation drives investor psychology to do unnecessary things like fill gaps that technically don't need to be filled, a derivative of the 100 monkey theory. Bill - ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tim Fisher" To: Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2000 11:22 AM Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Whip, whip #2 > I'd like a chartists' opinion of this, but since it had traded up through > 3600 way back in the golden olden days, then back down through it in the > recent baddie days, is it really a gap? It seems to me that a gap exists > where the stock has not ever traded at that level, then gaps up through it, > i.e. no there is no prior support or resistance in the gap area. Therefore > I see no technical reason why the NAZ would try to fill this particular gap. > > On 10:47 AM 7/27/00, kraus0r@cs.com Said: > >The Nasdaq still has that gap at 3600 it may try to fill. Notice how KEI > >stopped falling at the gap ? > > > >Roger > > > > > >canslim@lists.xmission.com wrote: > > > > > > Hope we can still find some bear sentiment, Tim... according to > > today's IBD, > > > it has slumped to 30.8%. Meanwhile bull sentiment has moved up sharply > > > to 54.2%, close to the 55% red zone. > > > > > > The semiconductor group has been ugly for two weeks, breaking below > > > several key support levels. I sold my last semiconductor stock ELNT > > into the > > > morning strength on Monday at 81 3/4. > > > > > > We had one major distribution day yesterday, and the action in the > > leaders seems > > > > > > to be to look for an excuse to sell.. If I see more of the big > > distribution, > > > I will be > > > selling into rallies, and moving to 100% cash in a hurry. > > > > > > Presently about 50% invested. > > > > > > Walter Stock > > > Oakville, ON, Canada > > > > > > Tim Fisher wrote: > > > > > > > Guess it doesn't look that dire to me. Technically, the NAZ has > > failed the > > > > latest rally attempt but has gobs of support from 3877 all the way to > > 3767, > > > > which has held since the beginning of June. Interestingly enough, it has > > > > been as low as 3873 today, and looks to be holding around the upper > > end of > > > > that support. The past few days, the leaders (i.e. recent CANSLIM > > > > breakouts) have held up far better than the index. I dunno about your > > > > accounts, but mine has outperformed the NAZ every day for a week. > > Sure, I'm > > > > getting stopped out of those failed breakouts, but many either merely > > > > dropped back into the base or retreated to the pivot and are holding in > > > > that range. Too many stocks on my watch list to list here are still > > within > > > > a few percent of their highs. > > > > > > > > But hey, bring on that bear sentiment! Let's have a big "V" so we can > > > > return to sensibility! > > > > > > > > > > > > > - > > > > > > > > > >- > > Tim Fisher > Ore-Rock-On and Pacific Fishery Biologists WWW Sites > > Tim@OreRockOn.com > WWW: http://OreRockOn.com > See naked fish and rocks! > > > - - - ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2000 14:41:10 -0400 From: "lynn williams" Subject: [CANSLIM] Re: sorry for the delay in answering you Anna. You may want to check out the investors.com site that is brand new this week. It features alot of stuff, such as the highlights from the paper and graphs. I am not sure what is available to the general public right now but they are beta testing the site for all services included to those who are subscribers. Is worth a call to them though to get details. maybe you can access all the info on the site somehow now. As for featuring stocks, they do that on the front page, with their stock of the day in the upper right corner, as well as in the New America section and generally in the first few pages of the front section...then all throughout the paper they talk about different stocks in terms of the NYSE and the NASDAQ columns...Hope this answers your question :) Lynn - ----- Original Message ----- From: Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2000 9:13 PM > [9.99.132.205]) > by e31.bld.us.ibm.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA15178 > for ; Tue, 25 Jul 2000 16:26:36 -0400 > From: asosis@ca.ibm.com > Received: from d53mta05h.boulder.ibm.com (d53mta05h.boulder.ibm.com > [9.99.142.5]) > by westrelay02.boulder.ibm.com (8.8.8m3/NCO v4.92) with SMTP id > OAA101952 > for ; Tue, 25 Jul 2000 14:32:12 -0600 > Received: by d53mta05h.boulder.ibm.com(Lotus SMTP MTA v4.6.5 (863.2 > 5-20-1999)) id 87256927.0070CC4F ; Tue, 25 Jul 2000 14:32:03 -0600 > X-Lotus-FromDomain: IBMCA@IBMUS > To: canslim@lists.xmission.com > Message-ID: <87256927.0070CB36.00@d53mta05h.boulder.ibm.com> > Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2000 16:31:57 -0400 > Subject: Re:Lynn > Mime-Version: 1.0 > Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > Content-Disposition: inline > > Nope, I do not subscribe.. I do get the Friday's (or Monday's) issue, > though. I live in Toronto and IBD delivery here is terrible. Thank you > for the tip, though... I will check every issue of IBD from now on. Btw, > if someone lives in TO and also has delivery problems there is a > workaround: Metro Library.. > > Lynn, you say they feature stocks.. Do they do it in a specific place or > should I comb the entire paper? > > Anna > > jeff.salisbury@xmission.com on 07/25/2000 02:45:52 PM > > Please respond to canslim@lists.xmission.com > > To: > cc: > Subject: > > (EDT) > Message-ID: <001f01bff64d$c5f8e100$ed3efea9@y55s1> > From: "lynn williams" > To: > References: <87256927.00407215.00@d53mta05h.boulder.ibm.com> > Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Whip, whip, whipSAW!!! > Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2000 11:34:07 -0400 > MIME-Version: 1.0 > Content-Type: text/plain; > charset="iso-8859-1" > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > X-Priority: 3 > X-MSMail-Priority: Normal > X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6600 > X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600 > > Dear Frank, thanks for your posts regarding your system. As for me, I found > PWER when it was in the 50s and began watching it... it was also featured > in > IBD as was IRF... I bought PWER at 62 and again at 75.. great stock.. too > bad they misreported the earnings yesterday but seems to be recovering > nicely. > Anna, do you subscribe to IBD?? It is a wealth of info and has an uncanny > ability to feature stocks that soon after take off... > Lynn :) > ----- Original Message ----- > From: > To: > Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2000 7:43 AM > Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Whip, whip, whipSAW!!! > > > > > > > Thank you so much. This is great! > > > > Anna > > > > > > "Frank V. Wolynski" on 07/24/2000 11:30:49 PM > > > > Please respond to canslim@lists.xmission.com > > > > To: canslim@lists.xmission.com > > cc: > > Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Whip, whip, whipSAW!!! > > > > > > > > > > At 08:47 AM 7/24/00 -0400, you wrote: > > > > > > > > >Thank you, Frank. > > >Frank, would you be able to give examples of your recent buys and your > buy > > >points? > > > > > >Anna > > > > > > > Certainly Anna, glad to. > > > > Remember my particular method is top down oriented in that I rely on my > > Market timing signals to put me into the market at the right time or near > > it. Buy or not to buy, in short. > > > > The first indication came from my Hi/Lo count system having peaked (to > the > > negative) on May 23th. We had been very negative and like all good (and > > bad) things they always change. Capitulation seemed to have appeared in > > some of the markets leadership, but I did not have a clear reversal in > > enough of the stocks I track, so I waited. The second signal to reverse > was > > another count signal of stocks in trends. This signal broke out to the > > upside registering a higher reading than I previously had. My lists were > > also gaining Green or positive stocks. CounterReversals were everywhere > as > > stock after stock whipsawed. > > > > On May 30st it was very evident we had reversed and were moving rapidly > up. > > I had a list of stocks in my Reversal list that were strong candidates if > I > > saw blocks and higher volume. PWER was such a candidate. It had very > little > > to move to get back to old highs. > > > > I've uploaded a chart so you can see more easily what I am next referring > > to. > > http://home1.gte.net/wolynski/index.htm > > > > The RS line was trending higher, the Avg Daily volume was on the > increase, > > OBV was trending higher. Another Relative Strength line I use is one > > against the group the stock is in ( not shown in the chart). This way I > > find the leader in the group and avoid laggards. The group was strong in > > ranking ( using my own scan of RS performance ) and having just > > successfully bounced off the 21day low price channel bar. > > > > I took a small position on 5/30 and added on 5/31 on the breakout with > > volume. The RS line was already upticking, the breakout seemed a > certainty > > when considering what I knew in regards to Market Timing. > > > > I've waited patiently for the markets to give me a sell signal and the > > first appeared on 7/14. Wanting confirmation I waited until my trend > counts > > dropped and broke out to the downside. That happened on 5/17 and I sold > the > > next day on 5/18. The reversal down had been confirmed by my > indicators, > > again using my system of counting Hi/Lo's and Trending stocks. I was a > bit > > early, but I've never caught the exact top anyway. I was happy enough. I > > have gotten alot closer on the bottoms though. :-) > > > > The trick is which stocks, again PWER was screaming with all it had. New > > Highs, new highs, new highs. Actually to be totally forthright, I was > using > > a count of Relative Strength new highs (both S&P and the Group) at the > time > > in a 21 day period also. That is what brought PWER into my sights to > begin > > with. I occasionally sort on the column in my screen that provides this > and > > review the chart patterns that stocks with high counts are putting in. I > > then look for compression against the upper 21day channel bar and go on > > high alert when it is near it and the market is near a bottom. > > > > I hope this helps. > > > > Best Regards, > > Frank Wolynski > > > > > > - > > > > > > > > > > > > - > > > > - > > - > - - ------------------------------ End of canslim-digest V2 #963 ***************************** To unsubscribe to canslim-digest, send an email to "majordomo@xmission.com" with "unsubscribe canslim-digest" in the body of the message. For information on digests or retrieving files and old messages send "help" to the same address. Do not use quotes in your message.